Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.

[DaveC426913]

What does 'being able to tell who one's biological father is'
have to do with 'Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.'

That 'etc.' is doing a lot of heavy lifting.


This thread seems very confused. Perhaps the OP should take some time to organize their thoughts.

 

[Pinball1970]

did you read that Practical explanation ? or not ?

I read the silly thread you posted eight years before you were banned by James R

 

[jaghnuh]

What? Are you saying a hand transplant invalidates DNA testing?



A DNA test is the gold standard.

Be sure to get a competent technician, one who won't, say, take a sample from a transplanted hand.

so do you think DNA does not exists in hair, skin color, skin tissues, bone marrow, blood groups, etc everything ?

and doctors are transplanting entire such hand or legs from someone else who is neither your parents nor relatives. so this pseudo DNA fallacy is gone with contradiction of entire hand or legs transplant.

so anyways now tell me what is the process of recognization of our biological fathre ?

 

[DaveC426913]

I read the silly thread you posted eight years before you were banned by James R

That time he posted no less than 20 replies and then disappeared after three days. Like a short-period comet, or an 8-year-cycle cicada.

 

[jaghnuh]

What does 'being able to tell who one's biological father is'
have to do with 'Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.'

That 'etc.' is doing a lot of heavy lifting.


This thread seems very confused. Perhaps the OP should take some time to organize their thoughts.

it has everything to do, in order to know who God really is, weather he is superman, ironman, santa claus or whatever gibberish random kids like you are saying.

and this thread is not confused mixture, but its you who is simply talking like nonsense, Everything is science," although you cannot explain science. you cannot do anything. you dont even know how to recognize ordinary biological father even yet.

 

[jaghnuh]

I read the silly thread you posted eight years before you were banned by James R

it is not silly but an empirical fact based on solid, verifiable and tangible philosophy which no one can deny.

 

[DaveC426913]

so do you think DNA

The question is really more what do you think? Because it seems you don't really know a lot about DNA testing, and are just guessing:

does not exists in hair, skin color, skin tissues, bone marrow, blood groups, etc everything ?

Yes it does. Which is why we can be sure we've got a good sample.

and doctors are transplanting entire such hand or legs from someone else who is neither your parents nor relatives. so this pseudo DNA fallacy is gone with contradiction of entire hand or legs transplant.

1. You ask the patient if that hand or leg belongs to them and not someone else.
2. If you test samples from two different pargts of their bodies and get two different results, you don't trust those samples.

By the way, the go-to method for DNA testing samples is a cheek swab. Not a lot of cheek-lining transplants happening out there. It's like you think DNA testing is done by people no more qualified than yourself.

so anyways now tell me what is the process of recognization of our biological fathre ?

Still: DNA testing.


Again: What does this have to do with the thread topic?

 

[DaveC426913]

it has everything to do, in order to know who God really is, weather he is superman, ironman, santa claus

or invented by humans.

or whatever gibberish random kids like you are saying.

This seems designed to do little more than elicit a reaction. Are you looking for a fight?

and this thread is not confused mixture, but its you who is simply talking like nonsense,

This is your thread. You've made a bunch of assertions. The title is about 'Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.' and yet here you are talking about DNA testing, about which you seem to have little idea.

Everything is science," although you cannot explain science. you cannot do anything. you dont even know how to recognize ordinary biological father even yet.

I don't know who is saying this, It's not me. I think you are confused about who you are talking to. Perhaps you need some time to collect your thoughts?

it is not silly but an empirical fact based on solid, verifiable and tangible philosophy which no one can deny.

Well except it's not empirical, not fact, not tangible and is wholly deniable. Other than that, sure.

 

[jaghnuh]

The question is really more what do you think? Because it seems you don't really know a lot about DNA testing, and are just guessing:


Yes it does. Which is why we can be sure we've got a good sample.



1. You ask the patient if that hand or leg belongs to them and not someone else.
2. If you test samples from two different pargts of their bodies and get two different results, you don't trust those samples.

By the way, the go-to method for DNA testing samples is a cheek swab. Not a lot of cheek-lining transplants happening out there. It's like you think DNA testing is done by people no more qualified than yourself.



Still: DNA testing.


Again: What does this have to do with the thread topic?

now tell me process of recognization of real biological father and stop this broken logical fallacy of DNA.

and under no circumtenses you can say that there is no biological father even before our birth, and God is too much for incomptent people like you.

 

[jaghnuh]

Well except it's not empirical, not fact, not tangible and is wholly deniable. Other than that, sure.

but what mature person takes seriously an random child like you ? who says that there is no father before our birth ? huh?

i following in their footsteps, wont listen to random gibberish like you.

 

[DaveC426913]

now tell me process of recognization of real biological father and stop this broken logical fallacy of DNA.

What is your objection to DNA analysis? You haven't said. At least, you haven't said a reason based on how it actually works.

and under no circumtenses you can say that there is no biological father even before our birth,

I have said no such thing. Perhaps you are confusing me with someone else.

and God is too much for incomptent people like you.

You do not know how competent I am. I appear to know more about DNA testing than you, so maybe you shouldn't be so quick to throw that word around.

 

[DaveC426913]

but what mature person takes seriously an random child like you ?

A mature person doesn't need to tell everyone how mature they are. A mature person doesn't need to convince themselves that others are children.

It sounds like you are trying to provoke a fight. It suggests you are more comfortable in an emotional arena, with vacuous insults, than you are in a rational arena with valid arguments.

who says that there is no father before our birth ? huh?

I have no idea.

i following in their footsteps, wont listen to random gibberish like you.

And yet, here you are, posting and replying.

What is your fear of civilized debate? Do your arguments only work if they are full of insults? Is this why you keep talking about 'children'? You seem to be projecting your own insecurities on others. You can discuss like an adult, can't you?

 

[jaghnuh]

What is your objection to DNA analysis? You haven't said. At least, you haven't said a reason based on how it actually works.


I have said no such thing. Perhaps you are confusing me with someone else.


You do not know how competent I am. I appear to know more about DNA testing than you, so maybe you shouldn't be so quick to throw that word around.

DNA fallacy is finished with entire hand or legs transplant, and let me answer this point of how to recognize an ordinary biological father, it is our real mother who has seen before our birth who our father really was, and knows it that who has tilled her.

so process is you have to ask from mother, "Who is my father?" And if she says, "This gentleman is your father," then it is all right. It is easy.
Otherwise, if you makes research, "Who is my father?" go on searching for life; you'll never find your father.
_______________________
are you on drugs ? huh? if not than you have said that this Practical explanation is not veriefaible and tangible or solid truth, and this Practical explanation means that there is father before our birth, be you generic pseudo scientists, psychologists, or anything learned scholar you cannot deny that under any circumstenses.
_______________
and biggest irony is you do not know yet how to recognize an ordinary biological father even, and pushing on this broken DNA fallacy, and farce is such generic pseudo intelligent people are taken as intelligent beings, and we have to listen to such nonsense who denies the existence of father ? that is not going to happen any time soon.

 

[Pinball1970]

And yet, here you are, posting and replying.

He posted the same stupid shit in 2018, had a tantrum when everyone told him he was posting BS, then got thrown off the site.

This is his sock puppet.

 

[DaveC426913]

DNA fallacy is finished with entire hand or legs transplant,

No it isn't.

You clearly do not know how DNA testing works. You should avoid speaking about it unitl and unless you get schooled on the subject.

The rest of what you post is, therefore, premature.

 

[jaghnuh]

He posted the same stupid shit in 2018, had a tantrum when everyone told him he was posting BS, then got thrown off the site.

This is his sock puppet.

yes, it is an most stupid shit that there is father before our birth, but who listen to prostitutes like you ? huh? i listen to real mother.

 

[Pinball1970]

it is not silly but an empirical fact based on solid, verifiable and tangible philosophy which no one can deny.

You posted superstitious nonsense and also..

"thanks for shifting burdon of proof on me. but it is your evolution, big bang, moon landing, life comes from chemicals etc are all unsupported and equally nonsense."

Not the brightest are you? You understand this is a science site right?
Hopefully not here for much longer.

 

[jaghnuh]

No it isn't.

You clearly do not know how DNA testing works. You should avoid speaking about it unitl and unless you get schooled on the subject.

The rest of what you post is, therefore, premature.

enjoy in your fools paradise, i cant take you seriously anymore broken man. and fit this into your fragile brain that under no circumtenses you can say that there is no father before our birth.

you cannot dare it, you are nonsense and nothing else.

 

[jaghnuh]

You posted superstitious nonsense and also..

"thanks for shifting burdon of proof on me. but it is your evolution, big bang, moon landing, life comes from chemicals etc are all unsupported and equally nonsense."

Not the brightest are you? You understand this is a science site right?
Hopefully not here for much longer.

yes, it is superstitious nonsense that there is father before our birth, and everything is science ( mr.pseudo generic scientists ) although you cannot explain science, you cannot do anything, simply talking like nonsense.

so who listen to prostitutes like you ? i listen to real mother ( aka Srila Prabhupada ) finished.

 

[DaveC426913]

enjoy in your fools paradise, i cant take you seriously anymore broken man. and fit this into your fragile brain that

As suspected, you won't or cant engage in actual discourse. You shout your ignorant ideas then plug your ears.

The only thing that fits into my fragile brain is logic and considered argument. Do you have any?

Insults just go straight through and out the other side. Because I am not a child and this is not a playground. I know this. Do you?

under no circumtenses you can say that there is no father before our birth.

Again: no one here is saying this. This is increasingly bizarre. Is it possible you are hearing voices in your head?

you cannot dare it, you are nonsense and nothing else.

And yet, here you are, presenting your idea here for feedback.

Who is the bigger fool? He who responds to the fool, or the fool who goes looking for feedback about his foolishness?