Help needed?

Manifold1 said:
Do you know what a Synesthesian is?
Click to expand...
Not until I looked it up.

We are quite rare... and mostly men.
Click to expand...
OK

I am also a high functioning psychopath.
Click to expand...
Does that have something to do with why you copy others work and then do some minimal algebra and pretend it is your work?

It's funny isn't it, how people stigmatize the intelligent when they have something on them... a social agenda of stigma surrounding ill-health. But what is ill-health.
Click to expand...
I don't think that is what is happening here.

And did Reiku suffer this also?
Click to expand...
Since you and Reiku are the same person, I think the answer has to be yes.

As far as I am aware, my life is excellent and I seldom fail an achievement.
Click to expand...
Glad your life is excellent.

My main interest is in psychoanalysis.
Click to expand...
You don't seem to ever discuss it on here in any of your different sock puppets.

What achievements have you made?
Click to expand...
Oh gee, lots. But none are a big deal - nobody will give a shit about them in 100 years.
 
origin said:
Not until I looked it up.


OK


Does that have something to do with why you copy others work and then do some minimal algebra and pretend it is your work?


I don't think that is what is happening here.


Since you and Reiku are the same person, I think the answer has to be yes.


Glad your life is excellent.


You don't seem to ever discuss it on here in any of different sock puppets.


Oh gee, lots. But none are a big deal - nobody will give a shit about them in 100 years.
Click to expand...




:)


Such honest answers, they have to be true.


Quick, send for the cavalry and have my account deleted at once! :p
 
Neddy Bate said:
We were talking about "squaring the circle".

From the wikipedia article:

250px-Squaring_the_circle.svg.png


Squaring the circle: The areas of this square and this circle are equal. In 1882, it was proven that this figure cannot be constructed in a finite number of steps with an idealized compass and straightedge.

(Bold added by me.)

Contrary to the article, Motor Daddy thinks "squaring the circle" can be done in just a few steps, by using the intersection points of two circles which are one radius apart, center-to-center. He also does not realise that any straight line drawn from the center of a circle to a point on the edge of that circle is a radius, which by definition is one radius in length.
Click to expand...

So add this to the list of things that I'm the first to do. Did you work out the areas of the different parts in my diagram yet? Do you know the length of the various lines? Does it all add up perfect using 3.14?
 
Motor Daddy said:
So add this to the list of things that I'm the first to do. Did you work out the areas of the different parts in my diagram yet? Do you know the length of the various lines? Does it all add up perfect using 3.14?
Click to expand...



The complexity of the lines, will involve very difficult mathematics... Certainly it doesn't add up to the quantity given in the previous diagram since it wasn't extended past a two-dimensional image.
 
Manifold1 said:
The complexity of the lines, will involve very difficult mathematics... Certainly it doesn't add up to the quantity given in the previous diagram since it wasn't extended past a two-dimensional image.
Click to expand...

They each have 3.14 square units of area. The circle has a radius of 1 unit, and the square has sides of $$sqrt{3.14}$$ units.
 
Motor Daddy said:
They each have 3.14 square units of area. The circle has a radius of 1 unit, and the square has sides of $$sqrt{3.14}$$.
Click to expand...

There are more components than that... I can't even fathom them at the moment. The circle for instance has a simplicity of a radius equal to 1,the square of the sides may then be $$\sqrt{3.14} + \epsilon$$ in which $$\epsilon$$ is a continuous function, if it isn't, it quickly becomes the famous approximation to $$3.14159$$... either way fits really. You can't apply trigonometry to a spherical system without perturbations not accounted for, like affine angles?

Extend a two dimensional sphere, extended by it's symmetry on a three dimensional hypersphere, you have something much more bizarre than your ''static background lines.'' You have to start thinking Tessaract- style. ... ... and time is one of those things, which should be like politics.... should never be discussed in public, but often is.
 
MD,

Sq2Gg4K.png


Assuming these circles have a radius of 1.000, please tell me the lengths of these blue lines. Thanks.
 
Neddy Bate said:
MD,

Assuming these circles have a radius of 1.000, please tell me the lengths of these blue lines. Thanks.
Click to expand...

Which axis? I can do the 3d thing, remember? Remember how component velocities don't equate to the right coordinate in 3d? You taught me well, Neddy!! Thanks!!
 
Motor Daddy said:
The area of the parts must add to 3.14 square units of area. MUST! Pythagorean theorem MUST hold true at ALL times!
Click to expand...

I sound like the borg queen when I say this (lol) but you are not thinking four dimensionally. Am I right in thinking you want to impose ''time'' on this image? If so, you do realize the image presented is an incomplete version of 3-dimensions, the background lines don't curve into the pi-lines according to symmetry.
 
Manifold1 said:
I sound like the borg queen when I say this (lol) but you are not thinking four dimensionally. Am I right in thinking you want to impose ''time'' on this image? If so, you do realize the image presented is an incomplete version of 3-dimensions, the background lines don't curve into the pi-lines according to symmetry.
Click to expand...

I can tell you when and where an expanding light sphere hits a moving point that's traveling at any speed and direction. In other words, I can tell you the exact time light will travel from any point in space to another point in space, 3 dimensionally, and tell you the coordinate that it impacts that point at!! Right Neddy?
 
Motor Daddy said:
I can tell you when and where an expanding light sphere hits a moving point that's traveling at any speed and direction. In other words, I can tell you the exact time light will travel from any point in space to another point in space, 3 dimensionally, and tell you the coordinate that it impacts that point at!! Right Neddy?
Click to expand...




If time exists then yes, there will be an symptotic time relative to ''large bubbles in space.'' These bubbles represent the boundaries at which GR breaks down, a subject I spoke about not long ago. But there is a catch... that is that maybe time doesn't exist and therefore neither can these relative bubbles. Instead, the universe acts on us according to the rules of Machian relativity, where all systems relative to us in the coordinate frame of the universe, are static to each moment in it's relative changes. It's only static because the changes can be symmetrical, a dilation ''here'' is accounted by a dilation ''there'' even in the quantum scale.
 
Manifold1 said:
If time exists then yes, there will be an symptotic time relative to ''large bubbles in space.'' These bubbles represent the boundaries at which GR breaks down, a subject I spoke about not long ago. But there is a catch... that is that maybe time doesn't exist and therefore neither can these relative bubbles. Instead, the universe acts on us according to the rules of Machian relativity, where all systems relative to us in the coordinate frame of the universe, are static to each moment in it's relative changes. It's only static because the changes can be symmetrical, a dilation ''here'' is accounted by a dilation ''there'' even in the quantum scale.
Click to expand...

Were you always this old?
 
The reason I want to know the length of the blue line is because I am going to apply the Pythagorean Theorem to this right triangle...

BAmbHrb.png


...which was obtained by bisecting the equilateral triangle in this image:

jMAl3oG.png


Get it now?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top