Healing Cancer from the Inside Out
- Thread starter stateofmind
- Start date
My point is that if homeopathy or any of the other "alternative" things that you're supporting worked with any consistency, there should be a lot of studies to back them up. If homeopathy can cure cancer, then why aren't there dozens of studies to prove it?
Do you really think that all the things that are possible of being discovered are already discovered? There are people who claim that they were cured of cancer through a change in their diet (check out the video I've titled this thread after.) I doubt any cancer foundation would care to research a possible cure that wouldn't make them ANY MONEY - they'd lose all funding after a while.
If ever there were a match made in heaven, it's woo woos and conspiracy theories. Lemme tell you about this carburetor that would make your car get 100 MPG...
what a load of crap, the goverment would LOVE to find out all they needed to do to cure cancer is to change peoples diets. They would be extactic, the health budget is the biggest item in the states and probably the second biggest for the commonwealth.
Not unless there was a conflict of interest and it would be in their favor to keep the pharmaceutical companies happy - after all, if all health were as easy as having a proper diet, the pharmaceutical companies would go completely out of business - I'm sure some very powerful people that wouldn't like that.
What big corporations would really hate is if people learned critical thinking skills, and stopped buying woo woo nonsense such as Kinoki footpads. But we both know there is absolutely no danger of that ever happening, and the gullible will continue to be fleeced out of their hard earned cash.
kmguru
Staff member
It does not. In India they have tested it time and again....There are more homeopathy doctors in India than any place on Earth....
The only people making more money from this kind of solution would be farmers and grocery stores... I don't see how those could be marketed better :bugeye: As for the footpads I've never seen or heard of them and they seem like a scam.
Diet on the other hand has a very logical basis for the cause of disease and health - after all, our bodies are made up entirely of either what we or our mother (while we were in the womb) eat.
And all media sources I'm aware of are constantly telling us that the health of the average person would be far better if they stopped eating so much fast food, ate less food, and exercised more. It's everywhere, you can't not know it. But it continues to fall on deaf ears. Humans like to do what makes them feel good in the short term, and to hell with the long term consequences. Cancer, heart disease, diabetes, the list is quite extensive.
But don't forget, one reason more people die of cancer now than in the "good old days" is because people live long enough to die from cancer, rather than being felled from smallpox, or tuberculosis, or any number of diseases that conventional medicine has cured or eliminated. What has homeopathy ever cured?
you forget who the biggest consumer of pharmaceuticals actually IS. The only reason the goverment wants to keep them on shore is so they can be extorted to keep the prices down (look at the difference in price between Australia and NZ). If they didnt need them at all our goverment would LOVE it. They could save so much money
You hit the nail on the head here. The diseases that plague us now are ones that are caused by long term eating and lifestyle habits - symptomatic medicine (aka western medicine) is futile against them.
Asguard said:
or they could give shitty treatment that just barely keeps people alive at primo prices and keep a bunch of sick people and their families in indefinite servitude.
Only because people will not take their doctor's advice. What can anyone do about individuals who refuse to listen to good advice, and smoke until they die of lung cancer? Nothing.
Right, but anyone who thinks chemo is the answer, and not a last resort, is in my opinion misinformed.
how does that benifit the goverment?
firstly they are less likly to be re-elected
secondly it lowers there tax base because if people are sick then they cant work which means they cant earn money and there for dont pay tax (something the US doesnt seem to understand)
thirdly it costs them more both in disability benifits and in direct health care outlay
God are you a conspiracy nut
People are greedy. You're right to think that the bulk of people (and consequently the country) would be much better off and more efficient if this were the cure. Those sick people often times have family members that have to contribute huge sums of money to keep their relatives alive.
The people who are making money from this don't give a shit about the country, they only care about profits for themselves. If the U.S. went to shit, which it is, they wouldn't be affected in the slightest.