Have science proved that we have spirit/soul ? [...]
In my opinion there is no such thing as a spirit or a soul and modern science has definitely not detected such a thing.
Everything in the universe can be explained by physics and then by chemistry and then by biology so there is definitely no place for souls/spirits/deities/monsters/unicorns anymore.
Everything in the universe can be explained by physics and then by chemistry and then by biology so there is definitely no place for souls/spirits/deities/monsters/unicorns anymore.
There is nothing to say that cells can only come from previously existing cells. If that were true, life could not have originally arisen.Just for the sake of argument. How do physics, chemistry, and/or biology explain why a cell is alive while its component organelles are not alive? And why living cells can only come from other previously existing cells?
NOHave science proved that we have spirit/soul?
Just for the sake of argument. How do physics, chemistry, and/or biology explain why a cell is alive while its component organelles are not alive?
Have science proved that we have spirit/soul?
Have science proved that we have spirit/soul?
(I assume spirit = soul. Look like what you see in movie, ghost)
Tell us what you think, Saint. You have been here a while. Has any part of the scientific method rubbed off on you? (Clue: Can you precisely define what a soul is? What are its physical properties? How do you measure them?)
It's the dynamic pattern in which they are arranged.Just for the sake of argument. How do physics, chemistry, and/or biology explain why a cell is alive while its component organelles are not alive?
Oh, yes. So much, in fact, that it eventually turns bright red and explodes in a big puff of smoke.Does the soul expand in Hell?
Magic?Just for the sake of argument. How do physics, chemistry, and/or biology explain why a cell is alive while its component organelles are not alive? And why living cells can only come from other previously existing cells?
There is something to say that cells can only come from previously existing cells: Cell Theory, proposed by Schleiden & Schwann. As of today, all cells can only come from existing cells. Lab attempts to create cells from non-living components have not succeeded so far. That doesn't mean they couldn't, but we haven't seen it.There is nothing to say that cells can only come from previously existing cells. If that were true, life could not have originally arisen.
That is 200 years old, fifty years before even Origin of Species. Things have moved on a bit since then, you know .There is something to say that cells can only come from previously existing cells: Cell Theory, proposed by Schleiden & Schwann. As of today, all cells can only come from existing cells. Lab attempts to create cells from non-living components have not succeeded so far. That doesn't mean they couldn't, but we haven't seen it.
There is something to say that cells can only come from previously existing cells: Cell Theory, proposed by Schleiden & Schwann. As of today, all cells can only come from existing cells. Lab attempts to create cells from non-living components have not succeeded so far. That doesn't mean they couldn't, but we haven't seen it.
And, even if a longer a period is required, that could be found elsewhere and then via Panspermia to here to further evolve.Life had half a billion years in which to form the first cell from precursors, using the whole surface of the earth and all its processes.