ToR original
Registered Member
People who have low sex-drives don't rape.
They do actually, they will use an implement for the sexual violence and most likely kill their victim - see serial killers and impotence
People who have low sex-drives don't rape.
It was a random pic I found on google of a whiny baby. But feel free to go on another negative emotional tirade like a typical human.why are you posting photo shopped pictures of naked women with children with cancer ?
Why is it that males rape often, but females don't?
I am talking about actual rape, not weird serial killers which are not the norm. Serial killers are abnormal people, outliers, not the norm.They do actually, they will use an implement for the sexual violence and most likely kill their victim - see serial killers and impotence
Also 'males do NOT rape often' it happens 'rarely' in civilised society.Women do commit acts of sexual violence, you either hear of it less or it is less common. As an act of violence, women are generally less violent.
Rapists (in civilised society) are also not the norm. Normal is defined by something occurring more often than not. Rape does not happen more often than it does not. Most men are not rapists. Most men do not rape.I am talking about actual rape, not weird serial killers which are not the norm. Serial killers are abnormal people, outliers, not the norm.
Another lie, I never defended incel culture, I simply said involuntary celibate stands for incel, and that not all involuntary cebs stand for incel culture.Says the one posting images of poo and whining about how he "needs sex" and blaming women for not getting any, while ignoring the fact that his tantrum throwing about women, his blaming women for rape is why he isn't getting any sex to begin with.
Not to mention the fact that you are defending "incel" culture, that has been proven to be inherently dangerous to the lives of women in general.
In your human perception you believe yourself to be in the right, just like humans typically do.Has it escaped your notice that people responding to you are doing so honestly?
That we are genuinely and honestly repulsed by your comments on this site?
I started this thread to give men rights to dress in womens clothes and have gender equality. You started this thread to insult and abuse me.You started this thread to abuse and insult women. This entire thread was started with the specific intent of harming women by defending a group of entitled men who see fit to believe that threatening, harming and killing women is acceptable because they want sex. Remember, you are the one who came out with:
Funny because that's how I see this post of yours.Your mathematics amounts to 1+1=23.
In other words, you are completely wrong.
I went to that website. They say unfacts and fallacies like thisLack of sex is not the driving force behind rape or why men rape.
The greater majority of men who rape are already in relationships and are sexually active in those relationships.
Rape is about power and control and humiliation. Sex is simply a tool to achieve said power, control and allow the rapist to humiliate their victim.
Your ridiculous assertion also ignores the fact that children are also raped, as are men. Do you think a man who rapes a child is raping because children simply aren't giving him the sex he thinks he needs? Because you are essentially arguing that rape happens because men don't get enough sex.
It would really help if you stepped away from the dangerous rape myths you have been peddling in this thread and actually learned about the subject.
You openly advocated that women hate rape because they view sex as being disgusting. That rape is simply disgusting, while completely ignoring and arguing against the fact that rape constitutes a gross violation over one's autonomy and body.
In your twisted perception that's how you want to see it.By putting it down to just being "disgusting" and blaming victims of rape because you argued that men rape because women don't 'give them enough sex', you diminish it, you diminish the absolute trauma (physical and psychological) it causes to victims. Trauma they never really ever fully recover from. It is always there, no matter how much one claims to have moved on, it's still there.
Again, another twisted perception. I was saying that the common way for women to get in the mood for sex is usually when they are in an altered state of mind. But go ahead and go on some tangent about how it is rape. It is founded on the fallacy that the sober state of mind is a moral state of mind, and anything that is an altered state of mind is inherently immoral, that is how this frame of mind begins, its akin to prohibitionist fallacy.You openly advocated rape when you declared that the only way for women to have sex is to get the women drunk. That is out and out rape advocacy and goddamn dangerous at that.
Again, in your twisted perception. But I said nothing of the sort actually, I was saying that women get in the mood for sex when they are in an altered state of mind. Any reasonable human who was born yesterday knows that buying a woman a drink and getting her in the mood, is completely different from getting her so drunk she can't move, dragging her into a car and date-raping her. But I guess I'm not dealing with common human beings, but people off on another planet somewhere.You literally argued that men can get sex from women if they get them intoxicated enough so that they can no longer consent to sex. This is open advocacy of rape.
Has nothing to do with victim shaming or blaming.It is not about sexual frustration. It is not about lack of sex. Rape does not happen because women don't 'give men sex'. Your arguments amount to victim shaming and blaming.
Again, if a sheep gets eaten by a lion, I do not really shame or blame the sheep, i simply objectively list the cause and effect of why that it occured.Can you please stop diminishing it as such? Can you please stop blaming victims of rape and sexual assault for the gross violations we endured?
You keep perpetuating a society of emotional bias, twisted perceptions, and lack of objective discussion.You are perpetuating a myth that exists with the sole intention of blaming and shaming victims of rape. It is not only wrong, it is dangerous and deadly.
Please stop doing it.
If anything I could say your ideology is dangerous to women. I simply state the obvious, that women should not be suprised if they enter a man's house alone. And then you go on some emotional tirade saying you are empowering women, like I think it is your philosophy which is dangerous to women, its like someone going into a self-defense class and telling the self-defense instructor that war and weapons are evil and dangerous to humanity.There is an expectation that you not act like a misogynistic tool, just as there is an expectation that you not advocate dangerous ideology that sees women killed on a daily basis around the world.
Again that seems more up your alley than mine.He closed it because you are simply using this website to spread dangerous myths against women. Myths that result in women being raped and murdered.
You very much are so.We aren't biased against you.
And you expect me to believe you aren't biased against me. Laugh.From my perspective, you are a dangerous individual who should not be given a soap box. You need the kind of help that we are not equipped to give you.
And neither is going to church and criticizing the illogic of the bible, in this case your church and your bible.Going on Trump like rants is not to your benefit. Behaving as you have been behaving is not going to endear you to anyone.
Most of the people seem to say rape is the norm, as they post stats saying 1 out of 4 women get raped.Rapists (in civilised society) are also not the norm. Normal is defined by something occurring more often than not. Rape does not happen more often than it does not. Most men are not rapists. Most men do not rape.
Most of the people seem to say rape is the norm, as they post stats saying 1 out of 4 women get raped.
I didn't post these stats, and it's besides the point, I never said rapists were the norm, I simply said SERIAL KILLERS were not the norm in relation to rapists.
Most of the people seem to say rape is the norm, as they post stats saying 1 out of 4 women get raped.
I didn't post these stats, and it's besides the point, I never said rapists were the norm, I simply said SERIAL KILLERS were not the norm in relation to rapists.
That's not what normal means, normal means just a sizeable chunk of the population.Gamelord have you ever been in a normal se
1 out of 4 means it is NOT the norm, NORMAL is the majority NOT the minority. Thus 75% of women NOT being raped is the NORM.
Meanwhile if those 25% women were being raped were all raped by the same one man ....
Thus 25% of women being raped does not at all mean 25% of men are rapists but if it did it (as it is the minority %) would mean it is NOT the norm.
Please grab a dictionary and look up the definition of the word normal. I can't keep explaining it.
I thought Tiassa was a she.He closed it because you are simply using this website to spread dangerous myths against women. Myths that result in women being raped and murdered.
If what you are saying was true, then the stat that 1 out of 4 college women getting raped is false.Often killers (sexual ones) start with lesser crimes. They move on to kill so their victim cannot talk. Not necessarily because they like or want to kill. They did however like and want to rape. Thus rape was the motivator not the act of killing. The desire to rape being the 'abnormal' trait.
Nope it means what the 'majority' is, the expected, the usual, the typical.That's not what normal means, normal means just a sizeable chunk of the population.
If the stat that 1 out of 4 women getting raped is true, the that seems a pretty common and typical occurence.Nope it means what the 'majority' is, the expected, the usual, the typical.
Rape is not expected, it is not usual and it is not typical and therefore NOT normal.
Get your head around the word 'normal' and you'll see why you're argument is flawed (and offensive).
If what you are saying was true, then the stat that 1 out of 4 college women getting raped is false.
Because that would mean that 1 out 4 college women are murdered, which is demonstrably false.
So either the first stat is true, and that rapists killing their prey is simply very uncommon.
Or the first stat is false, and rapists killing their prey is very common.
Well at least you admit you are speculating, which is more than can be asked of the other members of this thread.Not all rapists become killers only those who are likely to rape 'often' as the more 'often' they do it the more likely they are to be caught. Some rapists can hide behind power and celebrity ..another reason to have no need to kill. Some rapists rape thise who cannot 'speak' hence no need to kill. So not all rapists are killers, they don't 'need' to be. But if you took away their protections, you'd find a great number of deaths (I'm speculating).
Second, let me make this clear. I never said rape is normal, it is they who implied rape is a regular occurence when they posted that 1 out of 4 college women get raped.
Of course, I'm trying to be fair and get you to move away from 'defensive' to seeing the bigger ..more realistic picture. It's ok to accept defeatWell at least you admit you are speculating, which is more than can be asked of the other members of this thread.
You and I just have different definitions of normal. I don't adhere to the 50% definition.You shouldn't say it is 'normal' unless it is the majority end result.
In current wars - death for soldiers is NOT normal which is why the media is able to publish the details of every single one.