For the talking birds here, my argument in a more rigorous form is:
P1. The theory of evolution doesn't explain how life began.
P2. Evolution of species requires species with the "ability" to adapt to environmental changes.
C1. Adaptation is the evolution of new ways to exploit the environment and be "fitter".
This is not a valid argument. The conclusion doesn't follow directly from the premises.
P1 states what evolution isn't. Fair enough. I'm not going to comment on the soundness.
P2 states what evolution of the species requires.
The conclusion is simply another statement, relying on neither premise 1 nor premise 2. It is a non sequitur. It is merely an explanation of the word "adapt" as used in the second premise, but the conclusion and P2 are rather circular.
So as an argument.... I'm not sure there is any syllogism here, no formal argument, just three statements. If you insist there is an argument then the conclusion is invalid.
P3.The first forms of life adapted to the local conditions.
C2. The first forms of life emerged spontaneously (from some chemical complex), in "ready to adapt/evolve" mode.
Similarly here the conclusion has no bearing on any of P1 to 3. It is just a statement.
P2 says evolution of species requires adaptation to environmental changes, P3 says that the first forms of life adapted to local conditions, and P1 says evolution doesn't explain how life began.
C2 is some guess as to how life did begin,
It doesn't need P2 or P3. P2 and P3 are about what evolution and adaptation is, and because of P1, they have no bearing on the arrival of first life.
So you're left with saying that evolution doesn't explain how life began, and your conclusion is to offer up some alternative method. Unfortunately offering up one alternative leaves whatever logic there is between the premise and the conclusion as invalid, as P1 does not exclude all but 1 alternative. You offer one, for example, but our Creationist friends might offer one or two other.
So again, there is no valid conclusion here.
With my more nit-picky hat on, you also offer the phrase "emerged spontaneously" as describing the arrival of that first life, but emergence is far from spontaneous.
