is firefox the best internet browser or are there any better ones
the crappiest thing about opera is the absolutely shitty interface.thedevilsreject said:thanks for the opera heads up, ill check it out in the morning
$ wget --help
GNU Wget 1.10.2 (Red Hat modified), a non-interactive network retriever.
Usage: wget [OPTION]... ... Mandatory arguments to long ... suggestions to <bug-wget@gnu.org>. [/quote]
perplexity said:IE is a security hazard, as was recently discussed on a another thread.
Not really. If there's a difference, it's negligable.Athelwulf said:The memory usage gets annoying, but I think Firefox tends to load pages faster than IE does.
Not true at all. The toolbars are customizable. I only have the buttons I use.Athelwulf said:In IE, you get a shitload of buttons at the top of the browser window that I'm sure most people rarely use, and it's just bulky and ugly.
The Devil Inside said:the crappiest thing about opera is the absolutely shitty interface.
without customization, it is EXTREMELY unattractive and not very user friendly.
RubiksMaster said:Not really. If there's a difference, it's negligable.
Yes really. I think I've even seen a graph somewhere. The speed is definitely noticeable.RubiksMaster said:Not really. If there's a difference, it's negligable.
More people will try to exploit it, perhaps. But I think I've heard something about Firefox's source code being in the public domain and open for anyone to modify (or something to that effect), sorta like the Linux kernel. If this is true, then that means bugs and vulnerabilities are always being fixed. I know this isn't the case with Internet Explorer. There's also the point that perplexity mentioned.Nickelodeon said:Isnt that really because so many people use it, and so people are more likely to try exploit it? If Firefox was more popular it could be just as vunerable.