Famous scientists and electronic voice phenomena

I believe that tesla just found out alot of what was already known and kept secret. All that energy stuff knowledge is important probably to controlling the masses, and maybe they knew about that stuff along time ago.

But tesla just brought out what was just hidden.

I totally believe 100 years back humans where into contacting or channelling, but the rumours where that tesla tried to use techs to do it.
 
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/lostjournals/lostjournals05.htm


"Physics, extends beyond what is scientifically known today," Tesla communicated. "The future will show that what we now call occult or the supernatural is based on a science not yet developed, but whose first infant steps are being taken as we speak!"

Certainly! But not ALL of it. Many here could list dozens of "occult or supernatural" beliefs that will mostly like remain pure hogwash forever.
 
I believe that tesla just found out alot of what was already known and kept secret. All that energy stuff knowledge is important probably to controlling the masses, and maybe they knew about that stuff along time ago.

But tesla just brought out what was just hidden.

I totally believe 100 years back humans where into contacting or channelling, but the rumours where that tesla tried to use techs to do it.

Yeah, yeah - we know. "Hidden knowledge", secret underground bases throughout the world, mind control, the government's destruction of your life, etc., etc., etc. :rolleyes:
 
This topic is all old news as far as I am concerned, and view Nikola Tesla as one of the greatest scientists who ever lived.

Walter Russell Wrote about a meeting with Nikola Tesla in his book "Atomic Suicide"

"Nikola Tesla and Walter Russell did meet and discuss their respective cosmologies. Tesla recognized the wisdom and power of Russells' teaching and urged Russell to lock up his knowledge in a safe for 1,000 years until man was ready for it."

"Nikola Tesla told Walter Russell to hide his cosmogony from the world for a thousand years. "

Since I feel confident that some psychic phenomenon does occur, I have spent years looking for scientific explanations outside the conventional box so have looked into some of these ideas.

@ OP,
If you look at Walter Russell, you may find some ideas worth considering. He certainly has a large following who support his work.

In 1963, Walter Cronkite in the national television evening news, commenting on Russell's death, referred to him as "... the Leonardo da Vinci of our time."

Walter Russell could have prevented the second world war if people listened to him. READ THIS FOREWORD:
Recalling the important contributions I have already made to science. such as my work in
completing the hydrogen octave and my prior discovery of the existence of the two Atom bomb
elements given to the scientific world in my two Periodic Tables of the Elements
, assures me that
you will give serious thought and attention to these documents.
Present threatening world conditions make it imperative that science discloses the way whereby
the weakest of nations can protect itself from the strongest of them and render attack by land, sea
and air impotent.
This new knowledge will give science this power.
England could have been rendered immune from her devastating bombardment had the world
been receptive to these new scientific discoveries which I endeavored to give to it when World War
II started. Science, however, did make use of the two atom bomb elements mentioned above, which
I charted and copyrighted in 1926.

The world needs new metals. Many new rustless metals of greater density, malleability and
conductivity await division in vast quantities from carbon and silicon. These will be found when
science discards its concept of matter as being substance, and becomes aware of the gyroscopic
control of motion which will split the carbon tone into isotopes as a musical tone is split into sharps
and flats.
In the chemical elements, the sharps and flats are isotopes. These can be produced by man in
greater numbers than Nature has produced them, for Nature does not begin to split her tones until
she has passed two octaves beyond carbon. There is a tremendous opportunity for the metallurgist
of tomorrow to create new metals in the carbon and silicon octaves.
Of even greater importance to the world in this crucial period is the production of unlimited
quantities of free hydrogen. This ideal weightless fuel could be transmuted from the atmosphere
while in transit without the necessity of storage capacity.


If you look back at one of the most ancient cultures known to man (Sumerians), they had advanced math, literature, astronomy knowledge, a Fair Justice System, Schools, art, and seemed very much like us in many ways, although they were less technologically advanced. They also had a Unifying Theory in Physics based on Sound and Octaves like Walter Russell discusses, which is surprising because if you look at some of the teachings of Walter Russell you would get the same feel about Cosmology and our Universe.

NOTE: The main reason Walter Russell is immediately written off as a pseudoscientist is he includes the concept of god into his work. It is hard to read a page of his work without reading God this or God that, but he does have some interesting views.

Einstein wrote off the Aether with his Theory of Relativity, but he also adopted a New Aether although it would be rare to hear him call it that, and Walter Russels views encompass much of what we should expect to see in the Aether world.

I could spend hours just discussing Walter Russell, but he believed in freely distributing his knowledge, and all of his books can be found for free on the internet.

Like this one.

http://abundanthope.net/artman2/uploads/1/The_New_Concept.pdf

It contains science/pseudoscience like:
THE COULOMB LAW MISCONCEPTION
The Coulomb law statement that opposites attract and likes repel is not true to Natural law.
Opposite conditions ARE opposite conditions. Likewise, they are opposite effects caused by each
thrusting in opposite directions. It is not logical to say that opposites fulfill any other office than to
OPPOSE. Nor is it logical to say that opposing things attract each other.
In all this universe, like conditions seek like conditions. Gases and vapors seek gases and vapors
by rising to find them. Liquids and solids seek liquids and solids by falling toward them.
Radiating matter seeks a radiating condition in the outward direction of radiation. Gravitating
matter seeks the inward radial direction of condensation to find its like condition.
Opposite poles of a bar magnet thrust away from each other as far as they can go. That is the very
purpose of the electric current which divides the universal equilibrium. If opposite poles attracted
each other they would have to be together in the middle, instead of "pushing" away from each other
to the very ends.
When depolarization takes place the poles seem to draw closer together, but that is because of
their lessening vitality. They still thrust away from each other until devitalization is complete. When
motion ceases, the matter which it manifests ceases to be.
Scientific observers have been deceived by their senses into thinking that opposites attract each
other because of seeing the north pole of one magnet "pull" toward the south pole of another
magnet.
The fact that opposite polarities void each other when thus contacted has not been considered as a
factor in the matter. It is a fact, however, when two opposites are thus brought together by their
seeming eagerness to contact each other, both poles cease to be. Each one has voided the other as
completely as the chemical opposites sodium and chlorine void each other and leave no trace of
either one after that contact.
If the Coulomb law were valid, it would not be possible to gather together one ounce of any one
element.

If you get past all the God talk, he is an interesting guy.
NOTE: I also believe in god, but it is even a lot for me.

XIII
INADEQUACY AND FALLACY OF NEWTON'S THREE
LAWS AND ONE HYPOTHESIS

The Newton laws and hypothesis seemed to be a master statement of Nature's underlying
principles. They have held their prestige with reverence for their validity for three hundred years,
during which time the misconception that all matter attracts all other matter with mathematically
measurable power has been a fundamental of scientific thinking.
New enlightenment as to God's ways and processes will demonstrate that this belief is but one
more of the many seemingly obvious facts of Nature which deceive the senses into forming wrong
conclusions. The senses of man have too readily accepted these simulations of facts for real facts.
Newton's first law says: "Every body tends to continue in its state of rest or uniform motion in a
straight line unless it is acted upon by an outside force". Page 36
This law was written to fit non-existent premises which were mistakenly presumed to exist. A
body cannot continue its state of rest because bodies at rest do not exist in Nature. Bodies are but
waves of motion. When motion ceases, bodies cease to be. One might as appropriately refer to sound
being at rest in silence, for sound is matter-in-motion like all other bodies.
A body cannot continue its uniform motion in a straight line in this radial universe of curved
pressure gradients. Such a phenomenon is impossible. Likewise, all bodies are continually being
acted upon by two outside, opposed forces--not one intermittent force.
Every body in the universe is constantly in violent motion, even though it simulates rest. When
motion ceases matter ceases. A cloud floating motionlessly above the earth is moving at a speed of a
thousand miles per hour as the earth rotates. It is also moving violently in all of its parts.
It is also moving in a curved line of direction, not a straight line, even though the force acting
upon it is unchanging.
The same thing may be said of airplanes, planets, moons or radio waves. They all follow the
curvature of gravity pressure gradients because gravity is always curved.
Even the lead pencil lying motionlessly upon a table cannot simulate rest except through motion
so violent that your entire house would be instantly destroyed if the dual forces which cause that
motion suddenly withdrew their support of it.
I herewith offer the following laws which have meaning in Nature to replace this meaningless
first law:
1. All motion in this polarized, radial universe is curved, and all curvature is spiral.
2. Every body is the result of the exertion of two opposing strains which thrust away
from each other in opposite radial directions to condition its attributes and determine its
motion.
3. Every body is perpetually in motion until the strains of opposition which keep it in
motion void each other in the universal zero of rest, into which all bodies disappear for
reappearance in reversed polarity.
Newton's third law says: "To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".
This law is inadequate and incomplete, for it confuses the facts which govern motion. Just what
does it mean? Had it been written in either of the two following ways the confusion as to its
meaning would disappear, but either one would still be incomplete.
(1) To every action there is an equal and opposite simultaneous reaction, or
(2) To every action there is an equal and opposite sequential reaction.
The inference is that the latter meaning was Newton's intent.
To rewrite this law in conformity with Nature's processes, Newton's third law should read as
follows:page 37
"Every action is simultaneously balanced by an equal and opposite reaction, and is repeated
sequentially in reversed polarity".
That the above may be better understood by the scientist whose traditional training has fixed
within his Consciousness the one-way-universe concept, it would be well for me to give a few
familiar examples of the fundamental principle of the two-way concept which operates in every
action-reaction effect of motion without exception anywhere.
1. An outward explosion compresses in advance of the direction of the action and simultaneously
evacuates in the opposite direction. The following half of the cycle is in reverse. The evacuated
condition becomes a compressed one, and the compressed condition becomes an evacuated one.
No better example of polarity than the above could be cited. All electric division of the
indivisible equilibrium into pairs of opposite conditions takes place in this manner
--and the only two conditions in the universe are the compressed-plus and the expanded-minus
conditions, and their resultant effects of heat and cold--male and female--positive and negative, and
other wave vibrating pairs of opposites.
2. The discharge of a revolver and its recoil are simultaneous. The sequential reaction is in
reverse. That which was a discharge becomes a charge--and their directions are reversed. That
which was evacuated becomes a force of gravity which compresses at its center instead of around its
circumference . The concavity of outward pressures reverses to the convexity of inward pressures.
Curvature of every simultaneous action-reaction is the reverse of the sequential one.
3. The discharge of every outbreathing body, whether man, or sun, or electron, charges space by
compressing it. and simultaneously discharges the body by expanding it. The sequential actionreaction of inbreathing reverses this process.
Likewise, evacuating bodies simultaneously compress, and compressing space simultaneously
expands its wave-field boundaries to balance each opposite with the other.
Every outward action is an explosion which forms rings of compression at its equator. These
surround a large volume of expanded space. The sequential inward reaction of this action forms a
center of gravity within the expanded volume as a nucleus for a forming sphere. Every sphere thus
formed "explodes" radially to form rings of compression at its equator which again become sphere
systems.
These are the fundamentals of the constitution of matter.
This underlying process of Nature is present in its every action-reaction. It is the very mechanics
of the universal inbreathing-outbreathing process of Nature which motivates the heartbeat of the
universe. It is the inside-out, outside-in turnings of space and matter which swallow each other up to
born each other sequentially. This process is Nature's most conspicuous fundamental. Repetition in
Nature is due to this process.
4. Every growing thing which unfolds from the invisible pattern of its seed into visible form
simultaneously refolds within its seed as an invisible record of the pattern of the unfolding form.
The sequential reaction reverses the inward refolding direction and repeats the outward unfolding
direction of growth.Page 38
Newton's hypothesis states as follows: "Every particle of matter in the universe attracts every
other particle with a force that varies directly as the product of the masses and inversely as the
square of the distance".
Science states that Newton's mathematics prove without question that matter attracts matter. This
is not true. Mathematics may prove the measures and relationships of a mirage, but they do not
prove that the railroad tracks do meet there.
Likewise, Newton's mathematics may prove the rates of acceleration and deceleration of the
opposing pressures of gravity and radiation, as masses move toward and recede from each other in
their eagerness to find rest from strains and tensions of unbalance, hut that does not prove that
matter attracts matter. It only
proves that matter seems to attract matter, just as railroad tracks seem to meet upon
the horizon.
It would be just as logical to assert that planets were attracted by their perihelia because it could
be mathematically proven that all planets increase their speed as they approach their perihelia.
For Newton's third law to be valid, it must apply to all motion such as the orbits of planets as well
as to falling bodies such as the apple, which is claimed to fall because it is attracted to the earth. It
must have no exceptions, and it has many. Let us consider one of them.
When the apple falls toward a center of gravity, Newton adds up the product of the two masses--
apple and earth--and mathematically accounts for the rate of acceleration as the two "mutually
attracting" bodies approach each other.
When a planet approaches its perihelion, however, its speed increases just as the speed of the
falling apple increases. Unlike the apple which is approaching another body, however, the planet is
but approaching an empty point in space where there is no other body to add to that of the planet,
such as there is when planet and apple potentials can be totalled.
The planet accelerates, however, without having another body to "attract it" Why has not this
most obvious fact been observed long ago?
Let us look at this law from another point of view. Science has founded its cosmogenetic theory
upon its belief that this is a one-way, discontinuous, non-compensating universe, in spite of the very
obviously continuous, compensating
two-way universe manifested in all of its effects, without one single exception in all Nature.
Whenever Nature projects any wave lever from its still fulcrum, she projects it two opposite
ways--simultaneously--then reverses both by withdrawing both lever extensions back into their
fulcrum. This fulfills her invariable law which decrees that all motion is born from rest, seeks two
opposing points of maturity to rest, then returns as death to the zero of its beginning for rebirth.

If nothing else it makes people think....

He has many books with many pages of interesting work, and I think any scientist should at least look at this work.

I think there is something fundamental we are missing that ancient cultures seemed to grasp, and when we solve it we will understand a lot more about Coral Castle and the secrets of the pyramids, etc.

I hope this enough to make you look into this yourself.

russell_1.gif


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvCHOBxN-wU
[video=youtube;WvCHOBxN-wU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvCHOBxN-wU[/video]


Nikola Tesla and Walter Russell were good friends, and Walter Russell once wrote...

"Nikola Tesla was an Artist at heart whom the world viewed as a scientist, while I have science at heart and am viewed as an Artist"

Walter Russell Deserves his own thread here if only for a few who keep open minds. His scientific legacy was great even if clouded with his strong belief in god.

Walter Russell does not believe that light from the sun has ever left the sun, but is reproduced along the way.

Cheers.
 
Last edited:
Walter Russell Deserves his own thread here if only for a few who keep open minds. His scientific legacy was great even if clouded with his strong belief in god.

You think there's a reason to keep perpetuating incorrect ideas?
 
@ AlexG,
I like some of the ideas he gives over some of the ideas currently accepted by science.

I do not expect any here to have experience with psychic phenomenon, but I have witnessed events that seem convincing enough to me that I could never doubt its possibility. I do not wish to turn this into a debate on that and my opinions on this matter are likely well known to many here.

Walter Russell has Charted and predicted the existence of elements that have been discovered, and which have yet to be.

Neptunium und Plutonium

[Walter Russell] pioneered in foreseeing two of the greatest discoveries of modern times – the isotopes of hydrogen, which led to the discovery of heavy water, and the two new elements used in the atomic bomb. He announced the complexity of hydrogen to a body of distinguished scientists years before the truth of his statement was verified. But it is the atomic bomb that will prove to be the earth-shaking, epoch-making discovery of the future. The two newly discovered elements which formed the basis of the atomic bomb, called Neptunium and Plutonium, were published in his charts of the elements in 1926. He named them Uridium and Urium. He also predicted that if ever discovered the pressures of this planet would not be sufficient to hold them together.

He also predicted and discovered other elements. He was a scientist who was ahead of his time, and likely still is in some regards.

His Version of the Periodic table was an early construct of which their were many.

Much of what he taught is not in conflict with what we know but seems to be a deeper version of things.

If we leave god out of it. What specific idea of his do you object to? There are many I can see people choosing there, but I am curious to see if you have even looked at any before writing them off.

Walter Russell left a lot of interesting work, and I hope you live long enough to accept that some of it will be proven true by his large following.

I think our understanding of the Universe is amazing, but I also think it is arrogant to think that we know it all already. Einsteins Theory of Relativity is not the Grand Unifying Theory he hoped it would be and leaves many questions unanswered. Walter Russell fills in these holes with his theories and does not undermine the work of Einstein, but compliments it. Einstein hints at a new Aether, but Walter Russell defines it.

We also see reactions with electricity and feel we know all about it,

watch this and see a brief portion of his magnetism in electricity.

[video=youtube;LVRxC7U_2kQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LVRxC7U_2kQ[/video]

I understand you are on Auto-skeptic, similar to auto-pilot, but looking at various viewpoints is key to understanding the truth.

Even if you did find find fault with some of his thinking, you would likely learn more in the process.

A lot of his work is at the sub atomic level, where new ideas and thinking are still welcomed.

His Unifying Theory would require a lot of hard work and understanding to refute, especially as much of it is within framework even Einstein has put down on paper. I think if Einstein and Walter Russell had sat down together and wrote a Unified Theory together it would have been much more in depth.


Look at video below (unless your mind is too hard set in skepticism to even look at other ideas).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WjSC99ih9Y
[video=youtube;-WjSC99ih9Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WjSC99ih9Y[/video]

So he uses god a lot. This was the main reason he has been ignored by many. His ideas are at the very least profound.

@ AlexG (continued)

The OP of this thread specifically stated/quoted,

"Physics, extends beyond what is scientifically known today," Tesla communicated. "The future will show that what we now call occult or the supernatural is based on a science not yet developed, but whose first infant steps are being taken as we speak!"

I have at least added to this topic by showing that Nikola Teslas friend Walter Russell has already put forth some idea that ...
will show that what we now call occult or the supernatural is based on a science not yet developed

[video=youtube;abOwl9lqfRI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abOwl9lqfRI&list=PLMRRYtEF3DgaOUHNDtT1vjZePCsY9rDGd&index=13[/video]

If you wish to refute or condemn Walter Russell, at least make arguments against specific themes, and not an overall generalization as those are low blows and cannot be defended except by noting your closed minds, and making fun of the limited viewpoints some must endure.

Walter Russell has explained everything in the entire universe in a manner that has attracted many geniuses, and with examples hard to argue against. I welcome debating any of his ideas (except religion as that is pointless here). You can pick from hundreds of topics in his Theories..


Wikipedia.....
Legacy[edit]

Walter Russell presented theories on the "fundamental principles of energy dynamics," the nature of matter and the progression of the evolution of matter, and the depiction of the universe as a continuously changing, creating effort sustained by the systematic work effort of the energy of light. His depictions laws was a nonstandard cosmology. Students of his work today call it "Russelian science."[17]
Russell portrayed the principles of the unity of universal law in a way which he believed brought many mainstream theories into direct conflict, or incompleteness, such as some of the principles of Isaac Newton e. g. weight as Russell explains: "... Weight should be measured dually as temperature is. It should have an above and below zero... "[18] He presented a view of the periodic table of elements that led him to the prediction of the existence of plutonium and the two isotopes of hydrogen, deuterium and tritium[19][unreliable source?] which were known in theory but as yet undiscovered in nature, (as well as elements which are still undiscovered in nature) e. g. the inert gases 'alphanon', 'betanon' and 'gammanon'[19][unreliable source?] as well as the creation of heavy water.[19][unreliable source?] Russell's periodic table has not been adopted by mainstream chemistry. However in 1923, Charles Steinmetz of General Electric was able to corroborate the existence of some of the predicted transuranium elements by direct experimentation in the laboratory which helped to usher in the Atomic Age, in 1945

So he was a great scientist no matter if you find errors or not. It is like saying Einstein does not deserve a thread because he made a few mistakes and got kicked out of Math Class.

His Unified Theory seems to be getting more attention and seems to bear the brunt of criticism's. So go ahead.. Have a look and then ridicule it, but don't just ridicule that which you know nothing about.

P.S. He also did world famous Sculptures like this Mark Twain Memorial, and was a talented musician.
4_Twain_Memorial.jpg


Walter Cronkite - "The Leonard Da Vinci of our time"

I'd say he deserves a thread and just a bit more respect.
 
Last edited:
@ AlexG,
I like some of the ideas he gives over some of the ideas currently accepted by science.

I do not expect any here to have experience with psychic phenomenon, but I have witnessed events that seem convincing enough to me that I could never doubt its possibility. I do not wish to turn this into a debate on that and my opinions on this matter are likely well known to many here.

Walter Russell has Charted and predicted the existence of elements that have been discovered, and which have yet to be.



He also predicted and discovered other elements. He was a scientist who was ahead of his time, and likely still is in some regards.

His Version of the Periodic table was an early construct of which their were many.

Much of what he taught is not in conflict with what we know but seems to be a deeper version of things.

If we leave god out of it. What specific idea of his do you object to? There are many I can see people choosing there, but I am curious to see if you have even looked at any before writing them off.

Walter Russell left a lot of interesting work, and I hope you live long enough to accept that some of it will be proven true by his large following.

I think our understanding of the Universe is amazing, but I also think it is arrogant to think that we know it all already. Einsteins Theory of Relativity is not the Grand Unifying Theory he hoped it would be and leaves many questions unanswered. Walter Russell fills in these holes with his theories and does not undermine the work of Einstein, but compliments it. Einstein hints at a new Aether, but Walter Russell defines it.

We also see reactions with electricity and feel we know all about it,

watch this and see a brief portion of his magnetism in electricity.

[video=youtube;LVRxC7U_2kQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LVRxC7U_2kQ[/video]

I understand you are on Auto-skeptic, similar to auto-pilot, but looking at various viewpoints is key to understanding the truth.

Even if you did find find fault with some of his thinking, you would likely learn more in the process.

A lot of his work is at the sub atomic level, where new ideas and thinking are still welcomed.

His Unifying Theory would require a lot of hard work and understanding to refute, especially as much of it is within framework even Einstein has put down on paper. I think if Einstein and Walter Russell had sat down together and wrote a Unified Theory together it would have been much more in depth.


Look at video below (unless your mind is too hard set in skepticism to even look at other ideas).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WjSC99ih9Y
[video=youtube;-WjSC99ih9Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WjSC99ih9Y[/video]

So he uses god a lot. This was the main reason he has been ignored by many. His ideas are at the very least profound.

@ AlexG (continued)

The OP of this thread specifically stated/quoted,



I have at least added to this topic by showing that Nikola Teslas friend Walter Russell has already put forth some idea that ...


[video=youtube;abOwl9lqfRI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abOwl9lqfRI&list=PLMRRYtEF3DgaOUHNDtT1vjZePCsY9rDGd&index=13[/video]

If you wish to refute or condemn Walter Russell, at least make arguments against specific themes, and not an overall generalization as those are low blows and cannot be defended except by noting your closed minds, and making fun of the limited viewpoints some must endure.

Walter Russell has explained everything in the entire universe in a manner that has attracted many geniuses, and with examples hard to argue against. I welcome debating any of his ideas (except religion as that is pointless here). You can pick from hundreds of topics in his Theories..


Wikipedia.....


So he was a great scientist no matter if you find errors or not. It is like saying Einstein does not deserve a thread because he made a few mistakes and got kicked out of Math Class.

His Unified Theory seems to be getting more attention and seems to bear the brunt of criticism's. So go ahead.. Have a look and then ridicule it, but don't just ridicule that which you know nothing about.

P.S. He also did world famous Sculptures like this Mark Twain Memorial, and was a talented musician.
4_Twain_Memorial.jpg


Walter Cronkite - "The Leonard Da Vinci of our time"

I'd say he deserves a thread and just a bit more respect.

Walter Russell sounds fascinating. I've never heard of him before, but have dowloaded the book you linked in post #5 and will start reading it. Is that a good place to start concerning him ?

BTW, the title is remarkably similar to 'A New Model Of The Universe' by Ouspensky. Have you read Ouspensky at all ? I find him one of the best, although he is light on science and heavy on philosophy / mysticism - still deep probing stuff.

If you haven't read him, you would do well to read the aforementioned, but first, his 'Tertium Organum'.
 
To the OP .. I'm going to read the link you gave in your post #1, however, I'll say this before I do; I would be VERY surprised if Tesla said we could communicate electronically with the dead.
 
To the OP .. I'm going to read the link you gave in your post #1, however, I'll say this before I do; I would be VERY surprised if Tesla said we could communicate electronically with the dead.

According to the article Tesla thought the transmissions were from extraterrestrials on other planets. Perhaps only a hair slightly lower than dead people on the old official WooWoo meter. ;)
 
@ Lakon,
Yes. That book is a little less on the God overtones, but all of his work seems noteable.

Also.. Who says future science will be electronic? Tesla was very nutty. He suffered from Obsessive Compulsive Disorder which grew worse as he aged and died as a recluse. It is said that the FBI raided his Hotel Room Home after his demise and took whatever ideas may have been down on paper.
 
According to the article Tesla thought the transmissions were from extraterrestrials on other planets. Perhaps only a hair slightly lower than dead people on the old official WooWoo meter. ;)

Shows you have no real understanding of anything beyond what your gov tells you.

Look at what tesla found out and discovered, but somehow you call him crazy.

Back then people all over the place where channelling, so tesla just took that and wanted to use techs to pick it up. Whats so crazy about that? If channelling was being used and it was, what would be crazy about thinking some sort of techs could pick up the same messages?

People like tesla change this world, while the majority like you, do not.

I see absolutely nothing wrong with the idea, that if channelling was being used 100 years ago, that techs could be used to pick up what channellers brains could.

Shows you have no imagination. If tesla thought that, you can be sure govs thought of it too.
 
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/lostjournals/lostjournals05.htm


"Physics, extends beyond what is scientifically known today," Tesla communicated. "The future will show that what we now call occult or the supernatural is based on a science not yet developed, but whose first infant steps are being taken as we speak!"
apparently this device works by employing a white noise generator, a series of audio oscillators, RF oscillator, a mixer, and a swept frequency receiver.
the "recording" is taken by taking "snippets" of the swept frequency and depends on the listeners ability to recognize patterns in it.
a block diagram of the device makes it clear how such a phenomenon can be achieved.
 
apparently this device works by employing a white noise generator, a series of audio oscillators, RF oscillator, a mixer, and a swept frequency receiver.
the "recording" is taken by taking "snippets" of the swept frequency and depends on the listeners ability to recognize patterns in it.
a block diagram of the device makes it clear how such a phenomenon can be achieved.

That would be the Spirit Box which is now popular among paranormal investigators. But evps extend to radio transmissions on regular radios and played back recordings of audio recorders. There's even a method of using the feedback of a video camera recording its view of its own video displayed on a TV monitor. Images are supposed to be captured by this means, but sometimes I think it is just the paradolia or matrixing of an overactive imagination.

https://www.google.com/search?num=4...1451.2j7j1.10.0....0...1c.1.19.hp.GBvCKI5J3tc

http://www.examiner.com/review/does-the-ghost-box-work
 
Last edited:
@ Lakon,
Yes. That book is a little less on the God overtones, but all of his work seems noteable.

Do you mean the Ouspensky book I referenced earlier ? If so, I agree. I am about to start reading Tertium Organum for the 3rd time, then I'll read his 'A New Model Of The Universe' again for the 3rd time too. I find him compulsive reading - very enjoyable and thought provoking, particularly in how he treats time, dimensios, etc.

Also.. Who says future science will be electronic?

Not sure what you mean by this. Anyway, I have finished reading the Walter Russell book you referenced, and found it about as interesting as I do Ouspensky. Though I also found it confusing, but very worthy of a re-read.

Tesla was very nutty. He suffered from Obsessive Compulsive Disorder which grew worse as he aged and died as a recluse. It is said that the FBI raided his Hotel Room Home after his demise and took whatever ideas may have been down on paper.

Don't know much about Tesla.

NOTE - heavily edited, original post was accidently posted before completion
 
Back
Top