This is a discussion forum not a place to advertise your site. I am not interested in visiting your site.
If you want to discuss your ideas then copy the diagram, post it here and you can explain it and we can discuss it.
Last edited:
Experiment to test W=mg
- Thread starter Yaniv
- Start date
If you want to discuss your ideas then copy the diagram, post it here and you can explain it and we can discuss it.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
No, you explain it here, where we can all see it. I'm not going off to some unknown Russian site full of viruses, to read some wacky theory.
It has already been explained why this experiment hasn't been run (several times, in fact, looking at past threads on this). Unless you have some incredible new evidence or compelling reason on why this desperately needs done (beyond your imagination), then this is naught but an alternative theory.
http://files.yaniv-stern.webnode.com/200000023-60d4861cbe/450/21 predictions.jpg
In a positive universe positive matter experiences positive repulsive forces from all directions (Figure 21a). When forces from opposite directions balance an object remains suspended in space and weightless. When forces from opposite directions are unequal, an object is pushed by the stronger force towards the weaker force (Figure 21b). A free object moves towards the weaker force while a stationary object gains weight. The difference between opposite forces determines weight, large difference is heavier and small difference is lighter (Figure 21c). So if you heat up matter, introduce negative heat particles, lower the positive charge of an object, you lower the difference between forces acting on the object and its weight. (Rate of fall (g) is determined by the ratio between forces acting on an object).
What evidence do you need to test conservation of mass ?
I don't have the skills to do the experiment on my own and couldn't find scientists interested to do the experiment and publish the results.
What is a positive universe? What is positive matter? What are these positive repulsive forces?
If there are no forces on the mass it will also be weightless.
I agree with this.
I do not follow.
I agree that a net force in one direction will cause an acceleration of the mass, but what do you mean by a weight gain? Weight is usually just the force from gravity. It seems like you are saying that if I am in the Space station and push a wrench against the wall that this static force is weight. That is a strange way to describe the forces involved.
Heat is the transfer of energy, what are these negative heat particle? [edited: temperature changed to read energy]
Heat does not change the electrical charge of a body.
The temperature of a body does not change the forces acting on that body.
Last edited:
I have a theory that if frogs are painted blue you will get blue frogs
Everybody run out and get frogs and blue paint and check out my theory please
Post results here so I can check them
You can find out more at my blog site
http//ihaverabbitsundermytinfoilhat.com.ufo.flatearth.trumpisalizard
Everybody run out and get frogs and blue paint and check out my theory please
Post results here so I can check them
You can find out more at my blog site
http//ihaverabbitsundermytinfoilhat.com.ufo.flatearth.trumpisalizard
I wonder, skimming the thread, you don't have an interest in science but suckoring people over the internet for some monetary gain.
Lets get the results of the experiment.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
That "link" of yours is one of the funniest things I have read all week!I have a theory that if frogs are painted blue you will get blue frogs
Everybody run out and get frogs and blue paint and check out my theory please
Post results here so I can check them
You can find out more at my blog site
http//ihaverabbitsundermytinfoilhat.com.ufo.flatearth.trumpisalizard
I better make a decision after you read my theory.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Is this some sort of "push gravity" theory?
I am happy you got a smile on your face. #ResultsRequired
Yes, a similar force pushes the expansion of the universe.
You do not get this whole discussion idea do you?
If you do not respond to my questions then we aren't having a discussion.
Do you just want people to agree with you and not raise legitimate points of discussion?
I think discussing my theory before the results of the experiment is meaningless. The results of the experiment should decide if to discuss my theory further. Even if my theory is wrong the experiment should be carried out to test your #physics.
That is not how science or anything works in the real world.
I might say that if you put a horse in a high enough magnetic field that it will turn into a unicorn. With out a hypothesis explaining why I think that could happen, no one is going to try the experiment. Understand?
How has that attitude worked out for you over the past 6 years?
Not going to happen. You will just bounce from forum to forum lamenting how now one will test you great idea.
If you are not going to discuss your idea (on a discussion forum!) then I guess we are done.
Good luck.
If you really wanted to understand my theory you would have read it. But you didn't. You should do the experiment to test your #physics. And I think this thread should go back to #physics forums instead of being buried in an alternative forums.