Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by Muslim, Apr 5, 2006.
Wait I would like to stop you there. Don't edit your post!
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
That is pretty true, which contradicts your previous statement about evolution and chemicle reactions being different.
Biology is just applied chemistry, there is chemistry behind everything that is alive.
BTW i was abent for a while waiting for a debate to start.
And why go to another forum. Are you affraid of the intelligence of the people here like S Monkey?
If you want a debate then like minded people will support me and like mindeed peopl (if there were any) will support you.
Muslim for the record I am not an atheist but an agnostic, guess that must have gone over-your-head Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
People don't generally (with the acception of you ) edit posts to cover their tracks. I don't think that there is anything to be ashamed of about suggesting an enzyme is a protein. It is
You have undoubtedly heard of DNA, chromosome and genes. DNA guide the cell in its construction of new enzymes.
The DNA in a cell is actually just a blueprint made up of four diverse parts, called nucleotides or bases. Envisage a set of blocks that has only four diverse shapes, or an alphabet that has only four diverse lettering. DNA is a long string of blocks or lettering. In an E. coli cell, the DNA blueprint is about 4 million blocks lengthy. If you were to extend out this solitary stand of DNA, it would be 1.36 mm long -- pretty extensive taking into account the bacteria itself is 1,000 times smaller. In micro organisms, the DNA strand is like a wadded up ball of twine. Visualize taking 1,000 feet of extremely thin thread and wadding it up - you could easily hold it in your hand. [A human's DNA is about 3 billion blocks long, or almost 1,000 times longer than an E. coil’s. Human DNA is so long that the wadded up approach does not work. as a substitute, human DNA is securely wrapped into 23 or 24 structures although am not sure I think its 23. Anyway it’s called chromosomes to pack it more firmly and fit it inside a cell.
The amazing thing about DNA is this: DNA is zilch more than a guide that tells the cell how to make its proteins! That is all that DNA does. The 4 million bases in an E. coli cell's DNA advice the cell how to make the 1,000 or so enzymes that an E. coli cell needs to live its life. A gene is merely a section of DNA that acts as a guide to form an enzyme.
Anyone that suggests that all this happens randomly and not in a process is crazy. That is the problem; something had to create all this intelligently designed mapping and instruction.
You're all the same. intellectual wannabees.
OK lets start over in a new topic? we ignore all other posts.
The topic is set up: http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=53904
For fucks sake, we are having a debate HERE IN THIS FORUM. why are you constantly running away. Is it because your posts are being discredited or because you want to get away from the people you refer to as "Intelectual Wannabies".
NewsFlash: These people ARE intellectuals and some other people, like you are not even coming close.
Delete your other thread and debate with me here, amongst the sciforums intelectuals who are all redy for a good healthy debate on evolution.
I have brought together all of muslims posts and we can now start a debate.
So you can get all your Atheist buddies to back your lies up and make you feel good about yourself?
Post in the other topic, I don't see what the big deal is this is the proposal topic. Its not even meant for debating. If you don't post in that thread, in 3 days then I win by no show! those are the rules you agreed on.
Pi and everyone else you are wasting your time with this narrow-minded idiot, he will never believe anything that comes from the qu'ran yet breaks the rules when it suits him, like in the baccardi incident. what an idiot, and a complete waste of time
How does that have anything to do with the debate? if am a bad Muslim what does that have to do with SCIENCE? just goaway. You all know this Pi is going to lose.
i dont think anyone could lose against you muslim
Yeah, thats why you and all the Atheist are trying so hard to hijack the debate? and thats why the Atheist boy doesn't want a proper debate? I am not backing out from anyone. I know I have evidence to support my claims.
correct, a theory is not a fact unless it is proven (evolution hasn't been)
However it has not been disproven and usually a theory stands untill a better theory is suggestd (not one)
I don't think there is much evidence that race has helped or hindered humans much so far but it is very possible that wiuth changing surroundings one race may prove to have an advantage.
Evolution is linked to life Life = chemicle reactions
Biology is just chemistry
Ok, i'll leave out god but if we are leaving out god then what opposition is there to evolution. You need an alternative theory muslim
In that case how come we have several copies of the same bones.
Dinosour bones have been carbon dated to over 200 million years ago and there are no human bones from that long ago. The exact form of dinosours is probablyt not totally accurate but go to the natural history museum and tell them that the dinousour bones are fakes, see how far that gets you
I have never claimed to be an expert on evolution and i value the input of other members, that is what a forum is all about.
I will defend the theory and have sufficient knowledge to compete with who,who clearly has no knowledge of anything.
Since when a full skeleton is a requirement for saying that there was an entire animal? If someone finds a head of a felid, all we can say is that there was this head, but we can´t state that there was a body for that since none was found attached to it?
Have you ever actually seen the bones of mammoths and of a dinosaur?
You could, but no one would believe, except idiots. You would made yourself a fool.
How come scientists themselves claim and prove that a certain fossil specimen were not legitimate, but in fact a mixture of other species? Why this is done in only some cases, not in all of them, or in none of them, or only by creationists?
we 'atheist' buddies are not ganging up on you. you have simply made a hypothesis so stupid that no-one else will back you up
IF yoy weren't an idiot you would know what the word Atheist meant, it means somebosy who doesn't believe. and that includes not believing lies
could someone more informed than me say if this image is of a actual fossilized nearly entire T. rex, or if it´s a reconstitution of how dinos and other animais are usually found fossilized? The site where I found it is in some language which even the characters are different
Separate names with a comma.