Erroneous Formula

[NotEinstein]

The electron and electron antineutrino binds to form a anti-ud, this does not mean anti-ud is made of … now you got me.

So leptons aren't made out of quarks after all, because they need to bind first in order to produce them? Great, glad we finally cleared that up!

 

[Willem]

Ah, so you are admitting you purposefully posted it in the wrong section?

The purpose is to get someone to do the experiment. I thought I could convince someone to do "imaginations".

 

[NotEinstein]

The purpose is to get someone to do the experiment. I thought I could convince someone to do "imaginations".

Then why didn't you open the thread with that request? Why all the misleading and off-topicness?

 

[Willem]

So leptons aren't made out of quarks after all, because they need to bind first in order to produce them?

Yes but they would have to have something to do with quarks individually.

 

[Willem]

Then why didn't you open the thread with that request?

I didn't think that far.

 

[NotEinstein]

Yes but they would have to have something to do with quarks individually.

Like...? This is so vague, it's meaningless.

 

[NotEinstein]

I didn't think that far.

Then perhaps may I suggest you contact the moderation staff, have this thread moved (and closed?), and you re-try?

 

[Willem]

Please provide the calculations backing up this claim.

The entangled electron-electron antineutrino pair would have the size of their distance from each other, but theory might say there is an Einstein-Rosen bridge between them so that, for the two, they aren't very far apart. This must be included in the calculation and I don't know how to do that.

 

[Willem]

Then perhaps may I suggest you contact the moderation staff, have this thread moved (and closed?), and you re-try?

O.K. Will do that.

 

[NotEinstein]

The entangled electron-electron antineutrino pair would have the size of their distance from each other, but theory might say there is an Einstein-Rosen bridge between them so that, for the two, they aren't very far apart.

So... you have no clue whether this imagination of yours that you are currently describing will actually provide the right answer? So your post #52 was (again) misleading.

This must be included in the calculation and I don't know how to do that.

And there we've got it: a literal admission your post #52 was misleading. Why do you continue to do this?

 

[NotEinstein]

O.K. Will do that.

Yes, please do. This thread is getting more and more ridiculous by the post.

 

[Willem]

One could say the anti-ud has electron and electron antineutrino content, not needing the "sub". Maybe we need the "sub", on second thought.

 

[Willem]

#52 was misleading

Post #52 was a guess, I didn't even do a mental image computation. I'm just over-eager to continue the discussion.

 

[Michael 345]

That is not how science works, that is how imagination works

I think I can
I think I can

Physicists hard at work

 

[NotEinstein]

One could say the anti-ud has electron and electron antineutrino content, not needing the "sub". Maybe we need the "sub", on second thought.

You appear to be going in circles (in more than one way). You claim a lepton is made out of quarks, and now here you are (once again) claiming quarks are made out of leptons.

Post #52 was a guess, I didn't even do a mental image computation. I'm just over-eager to continue the discussion.

Then stop misrepresenting the certainty of your position. If you are guessing, please clearly indicate it as a guess.

 

[NotEinstein]

I think I can
I think I can

Physicists hard at work

I personally very much like work that's comprised out of nothing more than thinking up imaginations. Getting paid to daydream sounds like an excellent deal!

 

[Michael 345]

I personally very much like work that's comprised out of nothing more than thinking up imaginations. Getting paid to daydream sounds like an excellent deal!

Fan of Sheldon Cooper then?

 

[NotEinstein]

Fan of Sheldon Cooper then?

How can one not be?

 

[Willem]

claiming quarks are made out of leptons

I claim quark-antiquark pairs (not of a flavor and the same anti-flavor) are made of sub-leptons that have to bind before their quark content is evident. - This isn't circular its more like a finite spiral.

 

[NotEinstein]

I claim quark pairs are made of sub-leptons that have to bind before their quark content is evident.

Please explain what "sub-leptons" are.

And it's still quite circular. Are you even reading what you write? "Quark pairs are made of sub-leptons, which contain quark content."