Math about what? What results?There is no trick or joke, please feel free to do a vector analysis and use any maths you wish, you will see the results are apparently correct.
Math about what? What results?There is no trick or joke, please feel free to do a vector analysis and use any maths you wish, you will see the results are apparently correct.
Then again I say, "have you lost your mind"?That would be a correct assumption,
Are you saying that each of them are seeing the other from 5 minutes ago?
Somehow that simulation has convinced him that light now must have an infinite speed.Math about what? What results?
The model shows the results , we can clearly observe the simultaneously of the receivership of the photons.Then again I say, "have you lost your mind"?
But you can see in the animation that each cycle takes about 2 seconds....that's a time delay.Somehow that simulation has convinced him that light now must have an infinite speed.
See, toldya, origin -- it's an absolute simultaneity joke. Pretty dumb joke, considering you can actually count the seconds of the time delay in the animation!The model shows the results , we can clearly observe the simultaneously of the receivership of the photons.
Of course, but you haven't lost your mind.But you can see in the animation that each cycle takes about 2 seconds....that's a time delay.![]()
The software stuttered sorry, you miss the point, if I was on the moon and you was on earth and we both receive a photon from each other at the exact same time, when are we seeing each other?Looks like a time delay to me -- each cycle takes about 2 seconds. I'm guessing he's trying to say something about absolute simultaneity.
Yeah, I get the joke now, but it isn't funny, it's stupid.The software stuttered sorry, you miss the point, if I was on the moon and you was on earth and we both receive a photon from each other at the exact same time, when are we seeing each other?
It is neither funny or stupid, it is neither a joke, it is observation and experiment and quite simple net difference maths.Yeah, I get the joke now, but it isn't funny, it's stupid.
As each were 1.2 seconds ago.The software stuttered sorry, you miss the point, if I was on the moon and you was on earth and we both receive a photon from each other at the exact same time, when are we seeing each other?
It's like an Abbott and Costello bit where you've pre-labeled all of the players are are still trying to pretend you and Abbott are confused. It stops being funny and becomes stupid.It is neither funny or stupid, it is neither a joke, it is observation and experiment and quite simple net difference maths.
What you are claiming is totally wrong and an example misinterpretation and confusion.It is neither funny or stupid, it is neither a joke, it is observation and experiment and quite simple net difference maths.
I've been here like 5 years and have never heard of this "azo" person -- does it go by another name?Krash661 said
if this is azo, then R.O.S. and some flawed geometric postulates(from azo's mind) will appear in the conversation.
be advised--
Hmmmm....
As each were 1.2 seconds ago.
There is no universal now.
What? you are clearly wrong on this , the video shows you why you are wrong,What you are claiming is totally wrong and an example misinterpretation and confusion.
And following on from the other disastrous thread, says a heap about your intent.
I'm sure I laughed at it the first time I heard it, but in my defense, I was probably like 7.What? you are clearly wrong on this , the video shows you why you are wrong,
The top plane is the moon , the bottom plane is the earth, the red and blue planes are travelling photons at a constant speed. You can clearly see that the blue and red arrive simultaneously at their destinations, showing now is now and we see things in the now and not a past.