Displaying equations using Tex

One more time on the equations that aren't coming out:

[ tex] v = v_h(v_t/c +1) [/tex]

[ tex] v_t = v_{ht}(v/c +1) [/tex]

[ tex] v = 2c^2v_h / (c^2 + v_h^2)[/tex]

[ tex] v_t = 2c^2v_{ht} / (c^2 + v_{ht}^2)[/tex]

[ tex] v_h = c(c - v_{ht}) / (c +v_{ht}) [/tex]

[ tex] v_ht = c(c - v_h) / (c +v_h) [/tex]

[ tex] v_t = c/Y = DSR(c+v) = v_{ht}(1+ v/c)[/tex]

[ tex] t_{ps} = xv_{ps}= xYv/(1+Y)[/tex]

[ tex] v_{ht} =cDSR[/tex]

v Y [ tex]v_t[/tex] [ tex]v_h[/tex] [ tex]v_{ht}[/tex] DSR
 
Last edited:
It's ok, everything works now. I put a space in [ tex] to solve it and the other problem was with _{ht} which I tried to write as _h_t which was not accepted. My 1st day using tex so.
 
Testing......
x(x_{accel}, \tau) = \frac{-1}{\kappa} + \left(x_{accel} + \frac{1}{\kappa}\right)cosh(\kappa\tau)

Formatted formula should appear below.
$$
x(x_{accel}, \tau) = \frac{-1}{\kappa} + \left(x_{accel} + \frac{1}{\kappa}\right)cosh(\kappa\tau)
$$

If I leave the page and come back it is formatted. But when I just enter the formula and save, the formatting is not there. ?? I can work with that I guess.
 
Last edited:
Testing......

More Testing
Trying to have tex in a stream of text.......
A uniformly accelerating system of coordinates S_{accel} (often called

A uniformly accelerating system of coordinates $$ S_{accel} $$ (often called

This works.
 
Last edited:
Hi, I have been a member for a considerable period of time but am not allowed to use latex?
 
When you post TeX equations, you might need to refresh the page to see the equations displayed correctly. The dollar signs are used internally by the forum software to indicate regions of a post where the text should be translated as TeX code.
 
When you post TeX equations, you might need to refresh the page to see the equations displayed correctly. The dollar signs are used internally by the forum software to indicate regions of a post where the text should be translated as TeX code.
Many thanks
 
Still trying to make latex work:

Example:
$$\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
Displays as:

$$E = \gamma mc^2 $$
 
Still trying to make latex work.


$$E' = \gamma mc^2 = c p_0$$

is the Einstein energy.

$$E = \frac{1}{2} \gamma^2 mc^2 $$

Is the Osiak energy.

This worked for me in the Physics forum. Is Tex perhaps not enabled here?


This is the integration to obtain the energy in Osiak relativity:

$$
\begin{eqnarray}

E_k = \int_0^u d\mbox{\boldmath$u$} \left[ m \gamma^4\right] \cdot \mbox{\boldmath$u$} \nonumber \\ = \int_0^u m \gamma^4 u du \nonumber \\ = \int_0^u m c^2 \gamma d \gamma \nonumber \\ = \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \gamma^2(u) - \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \gamma^2(0) \nonumber \\

= E(u) - E(0) \nonumber \\

= \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \gamma^2 - \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \nonumber \\

= \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \left[\gamma^2 - 1\right] \nonumber \\

= \frac{1}{2} m \gamma^2 u^2 \nonumber \\

= \frac{p^2}{2m},

\label{OsiakKineticEnergy}

\end{eqnarray}

$$

This is the integration to obtain the energy in Einstein relativity

and with primes indicating traditional-relativity-unique energy quantities here and following, the kinetic energy is obtained as

$$
\begin{eqnarray}

E'_k \equiv \int_0^u \frac{1}{\gamma}\mbox{\boldmath$K$} \cdot d\mbox{\boldmath$r$} \equiv \int_0^u \mbox{\boldmath$F$} \cdot d\mbox{\boldmath$r$}

\nonumber \\ = \int_0^u d\mbox{\boldmath$u$} \left[ m \gamma^3\right] \cdot \mbox{\boldmath$u$} \nonumber \\ = \int_0^u m \gamma^3 u du \nonumber \\ = \int_0^u m c^2 d \gamma \nonumber \\ = m c^2 \gamma(u) - m c^2 \gamma(0) \nonumber \\

= m c^2 \gamma - m c^2 \nonumber \\

= m c^2 \left[\gamma - 1\right].

\label{EinsteinKineticEnergy}

\end{eqnarray}
$$
 
So that works, except I guess it doesn't do latex and \boldmath must be a latex-unique command? I can work around that I guess, but it seems to be not enabled in the Alternative forum.
 
Try \mathbf{...}
Trying ...

(This works in my Miktex Latex compiler but not here so far..)


$$

\begin{eqnarray}

E_k = \int_0^u d\mathbf{u} \left[ m \gamma^4\right] \cdot \mathbf{u} \nonumber \\ = \int_0^u m \gamma^4 u du \nonumber \\ = \int_0^u m c^2 \gamma d \gamma \nonumber \\ = \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \gamma^2(u) - \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \gamma^2(0) \nonumber \\

= E(u) - E(0) \nonumber \\

= \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \gamma^2 - \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \nonumber \\

= \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \left[\gamma^2 - 1\right] \nonumber \\

= \frac{1}{2} m \gamma^2 u^2 \nonumber \\

= \frac{p^2}{2m},

\label{OsiakKineticEnergy}

\end{eqnarray}



$$
 
Last edited:
Noting that
$$d\gamma/d\beta = \beta \gamma^3$$, so $$ d \gamma = u \gamma^3 d\beta / c = c^2 u \gamma^3 du$$, and with $$\gamma^2 -1 = (1 - \beta^2)^{-1} - (1 - \beta^2)/(1 - \beta^2) = \beta^2/(1 - \beta^2) = \beta^2 \gamma^2$$, the kinetic energy may be evaluated from Eq. (\ref{EkInt1}) as
 
One more time to get it right:

The Minkowski equation of motion is

$$ K = m A $$

with K the Minkowski four-force and A the four-acceleration. The Minkowski three-force is then related to the non-relativistic force as

$$ \vec{K} = \gamma \vec{F} $$

In traditional relativity, and with primes indicating traditional-relativity-unique energy quantities here and following, the kinetic energy is obtained as

$$
\begin{eqnarray}

E'_k \equiv \int_0^u \vec{F} \cdot d \vec{r} = \int_0^u \frac{1}{\gamma} \vec{K} \cdot d \vec{r}
\nonumber \\ = \int_0^u d \vec{u} \left[ m \gamma^3\right] \cdot \vec{u} \nonumber \\ = \int_0^u m \gamma^3 u du \nonumber \\ = \int_0^u m c^2 d \gamma \nonumber \\ = m c^2 \gamma(u) - m c^2 \gamma(0) \nonumber \\

= m c^2 \gamma - m c^2 \nonumber \\

= m c^2 \left[\gamma - 1\right].

\end{eqnarray}
$$


Thus, in traditional relativity the classical kinetic energy relation $$E_k = p^2/2m$$ is an approximation valid only at low velocity. However, the Einstein relativistic energy E' can be related to the time component of the four-momentum as $$p_0 \equiv m\gamma c = E'/c$$. This gives rise to the ``energy-momentum'' four-vector of traditional relativistic mechanics. In Einstein relativity, the time component of four-momentum is

$$
\begin{eqnarray}

p_0 \equiv \gamma m c = \frac{\gamma m c^2}{c} = \frac{E'}{c},

\end{eqnarray}
$$
where E' is the Einstein relativistic energy. The temporal momentum thus cannot be negative unless the particle energy is negative.


Noting that
$$d\gamma/d\beta = \beta \gamma^3$$ so $$ d \gamma = u \gamma^3 d\beta / c = u \gamma^3 du / c^2 $$, and with $$ \gamma^2 -1 = (1 - \beta^2)^{-1} - (1 - \beta^2)/(1 - \beta^2) = \beta^2/(1 - \beta^2) = \beta^2 \gamma^2$$, the kinetic energy may be evaluated from Eq. (\ref{EkInt1}) as
$$
\begin{eqnarray}
E_k = \int_0^u d\vec{u} \left[ m \gamma^4\right] \cdot \vec{u} \nonumber \\ = \int_0^u m \gamma^4 u du \nonumber \\ = \int_0^u m c^2 \gamma d \gamma \nonumber \\ = \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \gamma^2(u) - \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \gamma^2(0) \nonumber \\
= E(u) - E(0) \nonumber \\
= \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \gamma^2 - \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \nonumber \\
= \frac{1}{2} m c^2 \left[\gamma^2 - 1\right] \nonumber \\
= \frac{1}{2} m \gamma^2 u^2 \nonumber \\
= \frac{p^2}{2m},
\end{eqnarray}
$$
where$$p = m \gamma u$$ is the relativistic momentum.

In Osiak relativity, as in Einstein relativity, the kinetic energy is the total energy minus the rest energy, \emph{ i.e.}, $$E_k = E(u) - E(0)$$. Using the Osiak total and rest energy formulas as obtained, $$E = \gamma^2 m c^2/2$$ and $$E_0 = m c^2/2$$ obtains the familiar relation from non-relativistic classical physics, $$E_k = p^2/2m$$, but p here is the relativistic momentum.[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Back
Top