Apes cannot breed descendants who are goats, turkeys, chicken, humnas, lions, tigers, bears, or anything but apes whether in 9 months or a million years.
That is probably correct. However, in 100 million years, say...
That should be
obvious to all who understand basic biology. The reason is that apes carry APE DNA, not the DNA of any other animal. So evolution is and always has been a myth.
How do you explain the large amount of shared DNA between human beings and chimpanzees? Coincidence?
The "great homo-sapiens" is a made up creature from the skulls and bones of many different animals, my friend. There' NO WAY to prove that the skulls and bones that archeologists found to construct their fictitious creatures all came from the same body. Absolutely none. So their methods are in NO WAY scientific. They simply count on using the letters after their names to dupe the public.
Thanks for the information. I'll be very careful to distrust all those idiots with PhDs from now on, and just listen to you instead.
Er... what are your qualifications? Do you have any?
So which is it? Are humans apes or not? Or are those who espouse evolution so confused that they have no clue what the difference is between humans and animals and why and how each animal reproduces itself?
Humans are animals. For example, we are mammals. Do you agree? And mammals are animals, correct? Now, a dog is another mammal, correct? And does that make a dog an animal?
Now, explain to be again why humans are not animals, if you can.
And by the way, the term "re-production" means to breed descendants who are the same species as oneself, not other animals.
But nobody is identical to their offspring. Do you have children? Are they identical to you? Are you identical to your mother and to your father? (That would be a neat trick).
So, given that you are different from your mother, and that your children are different from you, doesn't this mean that people change over the generations?
Oh, but new generations will always be human beings, I'm sure you'll claim.
My question is: how do you know?
That's because NOBODY understands evolution since it's as subjective as it is imaginary.
So, you admit you don't understand evolution. Hmm....
I just saw a documentary in which scientists said they couldn't find one ounce of neanderthal DNA in human DNA.
Must have been a crappy documentary if it said that. You should try to find some real science. There are lots of good documentaries you could start with.
Anyone who understands the birds and the bees knows that the DNA of humans can't get into animals any more than animal DNA can get into human DNA especially the DNA of FICTITIOUS animals.
But human DNA is found in chimpanzees. For that matter, some of the same DNA is found in mice and humans.
Did you not know this?
Descendants are produced by the mating between the female and male of each species.
Only for species that use sexual reproduction.
Nevertheless, what happens next is that the egg of the female is fertilized by the sperm of the male, then the genes of both male and female are combined to produce an offspring.
Do th genes combine to produce an exact copy of the male? Or an exact copy of the female? Or a half-half mix of both, perhaps (which would mean when a man and woman breed, their offspring is half male, half female)? Or what?
Please explain the genetic process to me, as you understand it.
What that means is that a cow does not turn into a pig, a horse doesn't turn into an elephant and an ape doesn't turn into a human because over millions of years, their DNA just turned into the DNA of those animals.
Did it? So, the DNA never changed at all? Is that right? What happened? Did it all just get mixed around in different combinations?
Tell me: is it possible for DNA to be copied incorrectly when cells divide? If so, how do the errors that result get fixed?
Please explain. I wish to learn from you great store of non-PhD knowledge.
