Darwinism Benefits Scientific Method?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Honest answer. Why not? Why do you criticise a theory you haven't even read completely?
 
All life on the planet decended from one common ancestor. It's not polite to call your grandmother "goo".
 
You do understand, don't you, that words have a spectrum of meaning? Your pet definition isn't the one Spidergoat intends.

Anyway.
Nothing to say about the topic anymore? People bring up examples of natural selection being useful in other areas of science and you just resort to your typical sarcastic one liners indicating that you have nothing to say?
 
Your last post with even a hint of content:

I look at it this way, what has been called evidence by Darwinists, such as "transitional fossils," are not that, just wishful thinking, and Darwin said himself that "in a hundred and fifty years, the paleontological record would prove or disprove the theory," so a hundred and fifty years later, no supposed transition fossils to prop up this bizarre theory, that goo morphed into you.

Not to mention that the "complimentary" uniformitarian geology scheme is belied by the geologic record, so the evidence is against what mainstream science is force-feeding us, and yet it's all treated as fact, very strange.
Click to expand...

Strangely, you seem to have completely sidestepped the original topic of your thread and are now talking about the theory of evolution itself, rather than how Darwin's ideas on natural selection play a role in other sciences.

Lose track of your rambling there?

Ironically, there's not even a transitional fossil in between the topic and your tangent.

Ha!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top