dark matter temperature

[river]

That is an interesting scenario. if I understand right,
Energy, existing before the big Bang Bang could be called "Dark" energy, because it must have been there, but we can not see it. or beyond 13.8 light years into the past. The first few years are also opaque to us, but is that because all matter was " Dark Matter" ?--- not what mainstream science found. -- Then some of the dark matter became baronic, galaxies and stars? by emerging internal friction?

You don't .

 

[nebel]

You don't .

you/I dont what?

 

[river]

nebel said: ↑
That is an interesting scenario. if I understand right,
Energy, existing before the big Bang Bang could be called "Dark" energy, because it must have been there, but we can not see it. or beyond 13.8 light years into the past. The first few years are also opaque to us, but is that because all matter was " Dark Matter" ?--- not what mainstream science found. -- Then some of the dark matter became baronic, galaxies and stars? by emerging internal friction?

Not by friction nebel , but by collision .


It is the absolute zero and below , cold , superconductivity , that allows speeds faster than light . There is no friction .