Cowspiracy: The Astonishing Hypocrisy of Climate Alarmists

[Beer w/Straw]

Hey hey! You're only trying to provoke me. I'm listening to music, have a glass of wine, so go for it!

That would be the amount of respect you command.

 

[Beer w/Straw]

I'm still waiting.

Trash me for my ignorance and show me the light!

 

[billvon]

There are sins unto death and sins not unto death. Not hearing about Cowspiracy isn't a sin.

Unless, apparently, you are an environmental organization; then you attack them for not mentioning it.

You should work on hiding your double standards a bit better. Now you just look stupid.

 

[Eugene Shubert]

Trash me for my ignorance and show me the light!

Expect others to slander this light but here you go:

 

[iceaura]

Expect others to slander this light but here you go:

Still waiting for correction (or evidentiary support) of #113

This was your apparently false claim, if you recall:

It's an appropriate phrase given that many fanatically believe in a coming climate apocalypse and desperately whine about reducing greenhouse gasses to save the world but also hypocritically insist on continuing to subsidize the major environmental disaster that ensures the inevitable doom of humankind's existence.

The several features of that which appear inconsistent with reality include a severe overestimation of the role of agribusiness methane production in AGW, an erroneous attribution of overt agribusiness subsidy support ("insist on") to climate change activists, and the attribution of fanaticism to people who seem to be arguing for rational response to an actual problem in concert with continuing sound governance.

But perhaps you can clarify things.

 

[billvon]

But perhaps you can clarify things.

Unlikely; he's out of rational arguments. I expect another video next.

 

[Eugene Shubert]

Still waiting for correction (or evidentiary support) of #113

The evidentiary support was listed in post #126.

 

[Eugene Shubert]

But perhaps you can clarify things.

That's not a problem. See post #164.

 

[Beer w/Straw]

Expect others to slander this light but here you go:

You made a mockery of me by being dishonest. And now you hide behind youtube videos upon being called out?

 

[billvon]

Unlikely; he's out of rational arguments. I expect another video next.

That's not a problem. See post #164.

Nailed it in one!

 

[sculptor]

medium rare please
burned on the outside and bloody red in the middle.

 

[Beer w/Straw]

medium rare please
burned on the outside and bloody red in the middle.

Shut op and go away.

Your only intention is to provoke other members.

 

[sculptor]

up?

 

[karenmansker]

I'd like to interject into the discussion an interesting phenomenon . . . . studies (Russian) of the Vostok ice core found that there is definitely a positive correlation between CO2 and global temperature. Unfortunately (for the climate-change fanatics) the study found that rises in CO2 FOLLOWED temperature inceases by about 1000 years. Funny how that works . . . . .! Goggle Vostok Ice Core for additional source info.

 

[iceaura]

The evidentiary support was listed in post #126.

37 and 54 provided evidence contradicting your claims in 113 (they were posted by climate change "alarmists" who explicitly regarded cow methane and current agribusiness subsidies as significant and dubious)
44 and 54 were irrelevant - they expressed no views of their own on agribusiness subsidies, and seemed to recognize cow methane without denying its significance.
So the claims in 113 remain unsupported - in fact, mildly contradicted - by that "evidence".

That's not a problem. See post #164.

The problem was the inconsistency with reality exhibited by your claims in post 113. What does the video provide by way of clarification of your post 113?

 

[iceaura]

I'd like to interject into the discussion an interesting phenomenon . . . . studies (Russian) of the Vostok ice core found that there is definitely a positive correlation between CO2 and global temperature. Unfortunately (for the climate-change fanatics) the study found that rises in CO2 FOLLOWED temperature inceases by about 1000 years. Funny how that works . . . . .! Goggle Vostok Ice Core for additional source info.

That's probably because most of the warming trends in the past were not set off by CO2 boosting, in the first place.

What's your point?

 

[Beer w/Straw]

up?

Shut up?

Thing is, did I do the misspelling on purpose?

Go away.

 

[Eugene Shubert]

Post #126:

Evidence for blissful ignorance if not the hypocritical insistence in continuing to subsidize the major environmental disaster known as the meat, dairy and egg industry, which ensures the inevitable doom of humankind, is plainly evident in post #37, #44, #54, #78.

Who accepts, approves or tolerates the major environmental disaster known as the meat, dairy and egg industry being subsidized by taxpayers?

 

[iceaura]

Post #126:
Who accepts, approves or tolerates the major environmental disaster known as the meat, dairy and egg industry being subsidized by taxpayers?

Not the climate change activists - especially not the more "fanatical" ones.

Got anything for 113 yet?

 

[Eugene Shubert]

Who accepts, approves or tolerates the major environmental disaster known as the meat, dairy and egg industry being subsidized by taxpayers?

That would include spidergoat, DaveC426913 and billvon.

Meat happens to be a life-sustaining issue, and taking any measure that might result in more difficult access to meat is political suicide, and a class issue.

It is currently a life-sustaining issue.

They are making that decision. For the most part, they are choosing meat over rollback.

People demand such things as agricultural subsidies. Since we live in a democracy, that demand is expressed by the government.