You can't know, understand, write, read or use "English" without "ENGLISH".
What's a "straight" person?
Such terms imply that others are somehow crooked or wrong, no?
Homosexuality exists in all areas of the animal kingdom, if we are to apply our interpretation of same sex behaviour to other species. In other words, it is completely natural and no, it's not learned behaviour. You can't be taught to be sexually attracted to the same sex. That's something you're born with.
To suggest there is no evolutionary point to homosexuality is blatantly wrong. On the contrary, it's now becoming abundantly clear that homosexuality has a role to play in evolution [
https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/the-evolutionary-paradox-of-homosexuality/].
Not to mention that nothing prevents homosexuals from having children and many of them do have children.
Parents "force" their kids to be vaccinated from 2 months of age onwards. Do you consider us "scum"?
No one is forcing anyone to be vaccinated.
There are businesses, organisations and even government mandates that require people to be vaccinated if they wish to enter the premises or work in particular areas (eg work in hospitals or in a school). Reason is public safety - for obvious reasons. People who choose not to be vaccinated can always go elsewhere.
If someone is taking care of someone who is vulnerable, then that person should be vaccinated to protect those who are vulnerable in their care. It should not be mandated, because people should do the right thing. But because so many people are selfish arseholes, these rules have to be implemented to protect those who are vulnerable. If someone deliberately elects to not be vaccinated for whatever reason (aside for health reasons), then that's on them and they should not be allowed to be placed in a position that will endanger others.
Or people could actually attempt to educate themselves about vaccines.
This makes absolutely no sense.
How has school taught you to be a slave?
Do you understand what being a slave entails?
Depends on the school or teachers, and certainly depends on the parents.
Teaching is hard because of various reasons. Such as policies that prevent teachers from teaching science, for example, or critical thinking, history.. Not to mention having to deal with children who have no interest in learning because they think they know better or pushy parents. These are just some examples of why teaching is hard. I haven't even touched on things like low wage.
How do you define "think properly"?
What is "super high level thinking"?
Aren't you the one who just complained that schools were creating slaves? Yet here you are espousing that people have to be taught how to think.
I have no words at this point..
Imagine if people said the same thing when small pox was still killing people and they implemented a global vaccination effort....
1:
1: That might be true to a very small extent, but babies learn to speak before they go to school without being taught it so... I'd say that the subject English is more just required for learning how to read and write, and I would also say that it is taught rather well in this particular area. I just think that it is taught badly overall because of all of the extra waffle.
2:
1: A person who is sexually attracted to, or inclined to be sexually attracted to people of the opposite gender, without being attracted to those of the same gender, and without being inclined to be so.
That is what. I'll bet you already knew that though.
2: Such terms might imply this. Sorry if they did. I don't believe that anyone is crooked or wrong for having any sexuality, despite the implication here. I do believe that some people are crooked and wrong though. That is what I intend to change. I was thinking that a bit of writing along with a bit of money wight change it, if I use these things correctly.
3: Fine. Whatever. You win. I was just speculating despite the implication that I was pretending to know what I didn't. Actually, I can see now why being gay or lesbian or bi may have advantages amongst many social species, by strengthening relationships and group dynamics.
4: They would probably find the act required gross though, unless they grew the child in a test tube and avoided said act, or adopted. I recommend adoption for gays and lesbians who want children.
3:
1: No, because I don't consider babies to be fully fledged people, or maybe, in some cases. It depends upon the age of the child.
2: Yet.
3: Okay. As long as people retain the right to decide who gets to go on THEIR OWN property, that will probably be fine, and beneficial in hindering the spread of the virus.
4: Of course. However, I have an estimation contrary to one of yours. It is that most of the people refusing to get the vaccine are refusing it just because they're scared of it, because of the lock downs and the not being allowed to form groups with more than a certain number of people and all of the other totalitarian bs. To put it into perspective, they're pretty much scared of the vaccine like you are scared of the virus.
4:
Or they could and should do both.
5:
1: It would if you were smarter.
2: It has taught me how to be one because the teachers were way too bossy and the system was too and there was a ridiculous amount of work to do. I would say that this experience is common to almost every student.
3: Being a real slave would probably be a lot worse and a lot stricter. I don't know much about it, but I know enough to know that I have been taught to be a slave.
6:
Of course. This is just a generalization.
7:
Of course. So how do we deal with these obstructions?
8:
1: Thinking properly=Being smart in the way I was using this phrase.
2: Super high level thinking=Being very very smart.
3: I admit that complaining about schools then espousing that people need to be taught how to think may cause me to appear hypocritical. However, although I am a tad hypocritical, I am not THAT hypocritical. I think that school is a good idea, implemented in a terrible way.
In order to be implemented properly, it should probably go more like this: Subjects: Debate, English, Health. Optional for those who want to invent stuff: Science. Math. This was not my first idea. I have come to this conclusion based upon a series of arguments for these subjects.
I also think that school should not be a part of the meritocracy, because the fact that people will not hire people for something that they are rubbish at in most cases, and will fire them if they do this accidentally as soon as they find out, creates a natural and perfectly sufficient meritocracy which the schooling system doesn't even change much and might even worsen by excluding people who didn't get enough credits by preventing said people from getting any of the jobs they would have been really good at.
9:
You had those pointless words.
10:
They'd probably just be ignored.
