Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Actually the only folly started way back when you started to infest this thread with your unscientific ID nonsense, as opposed to science. The first I remember fondly, when you aped your hero Tour and claimed the time factor for Abiogenesis was wrong. It wasn't and stands as evidence for Abiogenesis to be highly possible. And of course as you already know, not withstanding more of your Tour aping, and conspiracy crap, Abiogenesis is still the only scientific theory we have for the emergence of life. And of course the many articles from reputable scientists I have included, all agree to that positivity of Abiogenesis, despite some doubt as to methodology and pathway. A few definitions you may find interesting.... gullible: Cambridge Dict: Easily deceived and/or tricked and ready to believe anything. [Good company in that regard with river.] Intelligent design: Wiki: Intelligent design (ID) is a pseudoscientific argument for the existence of God, Abiogenesis: WIKI: In evolutionary biology, abiogenesis, or informally the origin of life (OoL),[a] is the natural process by which life has arisen from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds. Although the occurrence of abiogenesis is uncontroversial among scientists, its possible mechanisms are poorly understood.