I didn't miss anything.
Can the Twin Paradox be simplified?
- Thread starter timewarp
- Start date
- Status
I didn't miss anything.
Have you bothered to double-check your relevant assumptions in your 'suggestion'? If you have not even bothered to do that, it is foolish to claim: "I didn't miss anything".
Do us both a favour and DO go back and review your suggestion and try to find what you missed.
Once you can assure me (on your word of honour) that you have at least TRIED to review your suggestion having regard to the 'hint' I provided you in my relevant post on this, THEN I wil gladly point out what it is you missed. Can't be fairer than that, hey mate?
.
I did not miss anything, please stop trolling.
Heh? First you evade and insult for no reason, and NOW you accuse ME of being the 'troll'?
Easy, mate. Take a deep breath and get scientific' instead of 'childish'. This is a SCIENCE site, not a kindergarten. OK?
Now YOU go back to my original two posts which you have evaded answering PROPERLY. Read them again. And answer honestly and without your rubbish attitude. OK?
Thanks.
.
Heh? First you evade and insult for no reason, and NOW you accuse ME of being the 'troll'?
Easy, mate. Take a deep breath and get scientific' instead of 'childish'. This is a SCIENCE site, not a kindergarten. OK?
Now YOU go back to my original two posts which you have evaded answering PROPERLY. Read them again. And answer honestly and without your rubbish attitude. OK?
Thanks.
.
Here is your answer: there is nothing missing, stop trolling.
So, Tach, is the forum at large to take it that you have NOT BOTHERED to review your 'suggestion' in view of the 'hint' I provided you?
Or are we to take it that you did do so and still can't guess what it is you might have missed?
If the latter, then just say so and I will tell you what it is. Fair enough?
.
Once again, please stop trolling, you have nothing.
May I point out that I am using the exact same tactics that you YOURSELF employ on OTHERS here.
So if it's good enough for you it is good enough for others too, hey?
So no more stalling please. Just admit that you don't know what it is that you might have missed when making your 'suggestion' to Trippy about different accelerations being needed etc etc. I will then be more than happy to lay it out for you logically. OK?
Thanks.
.
If you had anything, you would have posted it by now. You have nothing, so please stop trolling.
Making faulty assumptions again I see. I am a VERY patient man. Obviously I have something to post, else I would not have intimated that I did have it.
And I am fully prepared to post what you missed as soon as you admit that you can't guess what it could be.
Isn't this no more and no less than what YOU keep doing to OTHERS here.....Yes/No?
Are you not enamoured of such tactics which YOU freely use often on others here? Double-standards?
Just admit it so I can post what I have that you missed. Fair enough?
.
.
You have nothing, if you had anything you would have stopped trolling long ago.
Let's examine this latest post of yours.
You do not comply as you would have others comply. Hypocritical.
You keep evading. Dishonest.
You make assumptive assertions based on your own 'wishful thinking' about what I do or do not 'have'. Unscientific.
You keep dragging things out while accusing others of trolling. Trollish behaviour.
So, Tach, how about complying (as you would frequently have others do) and THEN you can quickly see what I have or not. OK?
.
My latest post says the same thing as the previous posts: you have absolutely nothing , if you had anything, you would have posted it.
So....is the forum at large to take it that you:
- HAVE gone back and reviewed your 'suggestion' to Trippy?....and that you..
- HAVE taken note of my 'hint' to you?....and that you ...
- NOW ADMIT you cannot guess what it is that you might have missed in your 'suggested' scenario?
Just post either "Yes" or "No" in answer to this post, Tach. If you post "No" you will be required to explain yourself further. Then we can get on.
.
PS: And they weren't ad hominem. It was a CATALOGUE of YOUR posting content/tactics and LABELED accordingly.
Last edited:
Trippy, in contrast to you, understood the explanation. If you paid attention, he even adopted the idea.
You filled a full page, you can stop trolling now.
Still busy 'snipping' in order to evade and not answer to the point/question posed to you, Tach? That is 'trolling' on your part.
So stop your merry 'snipping and trolling' and just comply and we can get on.
.
Click here and read.
"Have you considered Tach's suggestion - accelerating two identitical clocks at different rates to the same speed (in an arbitrary rest frame)?"
Others understood the idea without any difficulty, so you can cease and desist in your trolling.
Stop making irrelevant/diversionary links and just admit that you don't know what it is that I know you HAVE missed.
Your 'link' merely points to an allusion by Trippy made to YOUR 'suggestion'...which is precisely THE suggestion you made there that is the subject of what I want to point out to you that you MISSED when making that suggestion. OK?
Speak up, Tach.
.
Others understood perfectly, not clear where your difficulties come from but you will have to figure the scenario one day. Or maybe not.
Others only read what you 'suggested'. Until you and everyone sees what I have to point out that you missed in making that suggestion, it remains suspect for the purposes for which you assumed as a 'correcting' to Trippy.
Give up?
.
- Status