Can Gravity be derived without using Newton's Gravitational constant?

Spin , the faster the spin along with density of the medium , the stronger the gravity . Gravity has direction because of rotation .
The Earth spins once per day. The Moon spins once per month (approximately). The Moon's surface gravity is 1/6 of the Earth's, despite the 1/30 ratio of the rotation rates.

Show me your derivation of the surface accelerations due to gravity on the Earth and Moon, based on their spins, please.

Or retract your claim that spin causes gravity.
Sure but gravity has also direction. Without rotation gravity has no direction.
How is the direction of gravity on the Earth's surface related to the rotation of the Earth?

At the south pole, gravity points towards the centre of the Earth. At the north pole, gravity points in the exact opposite direction (still towards the centre of the Earth). At the equator, gravity points at right angles to its directions at the north and south poles.

Show me how you derive the direction of gravity on the Earth's surface from the spin.

Or retract your claim that the direction of gravity is related to spin.
 
Please post coherently. Claims should be supported by evidence and/or coherent arguments.
If there was no spin by Earth . Where would gravity get is direction ? The further away from Earth you go the less direction there is . Hence Gravity has direction . Vortex of direction . Because of spin .
Our atmosphere is about spin .
 
Last edited:
If there was no spin by Earth . Where would gravity get is direction ? The further away from Earth you go the less direction there is . Hence Gravity has direction . Vortex of direction . Because of spin .
Our atmosphere is about spin .
No. We retain our atmosphere because of gravity you have this backwards.
 
If there was no spin by Earth . Where would gravity get is direction ? The further away from Earth you go the less direction there is . Hence Gravity has direction . Vortex of direction . Because of spin .
Our atmosphere is about spin .
Wow, you're just a plethora of nonsense.
 
river:

Let's try this again. I asked you:
How is the direction of gravity on the Earth's surface related to the rotation of the Earth?

Show me how you derive the direction of gravity on the Earth's surface from the spin.

Or retract your claim that the direction of gravity is related to spin.
Please try to support your claims with evidence and/or arguments.

Making baseless claims is essentially a kind of trolling. You need to stop that.

Will you retract your claim or try to support it?
 
river:

Let's try this again. I asked you:



Please try to support your claims with evidence and/or arguments.

Making baseless claims is essentially a kind of trolling. You need to stop that.

Will you retract your claim or try to support it?
Rotation . Is a part of gravity . Every planet rotates . And some have rings . The rings are visibly observed . With rings being on the equatorial plane of rotation . Which have movement in or out from the planet . Hence rings .
 
Rotation . Is a part of gravity . Every planet rotates . And some have rings . The rings are visibly observed . With rings being on the equatorial plane of rotation . Which have movement in or out from the planet . Hence rings .

Rotation . Is a part of gravity . Every planet rotates . And some have rings . The rings are visibly observed . With rings being on the equatorial plane of rotation . Which have movement in or out from the planet . Hence rings .
River, I know the answer. Planets with rings are married planets. And those without rings are unmarried.
 
rotation by all planets combined in our solar system . Rotate within what use to called an either , but on the quantum scale .
 
Rotation . Is a part of gravity .
Simply repeating your claims over and over again is no use.

You cannot support them. You ought to retract them.

Please retract your claim that rotation causes gravity.
Every planet rotates.
How do you know?
And some have rings. The rings are visibly observed. With rings being on the equatorial plane of rotation.
This does nothing to support your claim that rotation causes or otherwise affects gravity.
Which have movement in or out from the planet.
What are you even talking about?

Are you drunk or something?
 
Simply repeating your claims over and over again is no use.

You cannot support them. You ought to retract them.

Please retract your claim that rotation causes gravity.

How do you know?

This does nothing to support your claim that rotation causes or otherwise affects gravity.

What are you even talking about?

Are you drunk or something?
Explain planetary rings .
 
Explain planetary rings .
Gravity (caused by mass) interacts with momentum (caused by the kinetic energy of a moving object) and results in an orbit, which is a stable closed path of an object around a mass. A ring is a lot of material orbiting a planet, such that it looks somewhat solid. (It really isn't solid.)
 
Explain planetary rings .
Not until you answer the direct questions I asked you. If you want to have a conversation, that means we go back and forth. You will have to put some effort in, along with the people who are answering your questions with so much patience.

Think about that before you post again.
 
Back
Top