Russia is still a dictatorship.
If there is evidence that Russia hacked the DNC servers, it had better be strong and specific. After all, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Perhaps this is why the intelligence community is reluctant to release anything. They know that what they have is weak and inconclusive.
LOL...You can't make a cogent argument; so you are reduced to ad hominem and other sorts of fallacious argument. Moreover, you have resorted to making stuff up, i.e. lying, You comrade are the one who brought up the issue of the USSR and you keep bringing it up. You need to begin being being honest. But then you don't have a case. It's a catch 22, isn't it?Are you Mccarthy's son by any chance . He blamed everything on the USSR since he is not a live any more and there is no USSR. but you are a new breed you must be his son.
I like how you use critical thinking only when it's convenient for you.If there is evidence that Russia hacked the DNC servers, it had better be strong and specific. After all, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Perhaps this is why the intelligence community is reluctant to release anything. They know that what they have is weak and inconclusive.
GOP servers too. Only they didn't release that stuff.If there is evidence that Russia hacked the DNC servers,..
Well, there is nothing extraordinary about the Russian government hacking computers and spreading misinformation. They have been doing that for a very long time. And if you listen or read, you would know that all American intelligence agencies are in agreement. Moreover, the independent private company involved in cyber security has caught the Ruskies in action. So you have all American intelliegnce agencies and the private security firm which examined the hacked computers are all in agreement. They all accuse the Russians.If there is evidence that Russia hacked the DNC servers, it had better be strong and specific. After all, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Perhaps this is why the intelligence community is reluctant to release anything. They know that what they have is weak and inconclusive.
There is of course obvious and substantial evidence - we can see that.If there is evidence that Russia hacked the DNC servers, it had better be strong and specific. After all, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Perhaps this is why the intelligence community is reluctant to release anything. They know that what they have is weak and inconclusive.
It's not a matter of understanding them. It's a matter of them being indistinguishable from your sincere posting.As if I would have to care if some idiots understand my jokes
Good for them, we wish them well.The victims of US interference in foreign elections are, of course, usually not US citizens, thus, US-internal corruption is not a problem for them. They have to care about their own corrupt politicians. And especially care about those paid by the US.
In this case, you have been able to make the difference. So, the intellectual requirements to understand the difference have not been too high for you. And that some more subtle points cannot be understood by some readers is not harmful. The best books for children are those which remain interesting reading for adults too, because they are full of such subtle points.It's not a matter of understanding them. It's a matter of them being indistinguishable from your sincere posting.
Only a power which at least declares and promises that it will not do such things has any moral right to blame others for doing such things.Back to the topic, which was Russian hacking and undermining of US political campaigns during a major election.
GOP servers too. Only they didn't release that stuff.
To think, it was those crazy Republicans who were always fighting off those darned Russians...in the past. I am so losing any faith I once had in my government, media, and the people around me. Yes, the CIA is sooo believable. No evidence of deception in their history. Take it on faith.Very convinient of them. We have proof but we cant show it to you, because its super secret. Suuuure
So? Why are you posting irrelevancy?Only a power which at least declares and promises that it will not do such things has any moral right to blame others for doing such things.
You talk as if the only motive were tit for tat.If the US continues to hack worldwide, it has to live now with other states hacking in the US. If the US continues to influence foreign elections, it has to live now with other states influencing US elections. If the US continues to support, with money and equipment, terrorist organizations around the world, there will be in some future support, with money and equipment, of whatever terrorist organizations inside the US.
There are people who have been trying to wake you up, telling you the truth as they saw it, discussing matters in good faith, and coming to well-supported conclusions borne out by thirty years of event. You can find them if you want to, place your faith in people who don't lie for a living and have a track record of insight and accurate description. There's lots of them, and they could use the help.I am so losing any faith I once had in my government, media, and the people around me.
lolTo think, it was those crazy Republicans who were always fighting off those darned Russians...in the past. I am so losing any faith I once had in my government, media, and the people around me. Yes, the CIA is sooo believable. No evidence of deception in their history. Take it on faith.
Well, at least you still have faith in Putin.To think, it was those crazy Republicans who were always fighting off those darned Russians...in the past. I am so losing any faith I once had in my government, media, and the people around me.
Let's do a poll:Yes, the CIA is sooo believable. No evidence of deception in their history. Take it on faith.
That's considered a success in some circles.I am so losing any faith I once had in my government, media, and the people around me.
Seems more likely than not. Does cyberwarfare exist? Yes. Is Russia engaged in it? Yes, they have at least two departments devoted to it. Do they have an interest in the outcome of the election? Yes. Do they regularly do far worse things as a matter of course? Yup.Very convinient of them. We have proof but we cant show it to you, because its super secret. Suuuure
Well, at least you still have faith in Putin.
Let's do a poll:
Are the Russians innocent?
1) Yes. The Russians have only our best interests at heart, and would never do anything to harm us.
2) Yes, the CIA, NSA, DHS and FBI are all lying to us to smear those poor, innocent Russians.
3) Yes, the Russians are completely powerless to pull something like this off - FOX News said so.
4) No, but they helped to get Trump elected, and that's all that matters!
So which will it be?
Seems more likely than not. Does cyberwarfare exist? Yes. Is Russia engaged in it? Yes, they have at least two departments devoted to it. Do they have an interest in the outcome of the election? Yes. Do they regularly do far worse things as a matter of course? Yup.
I disagree. Russian _people_ are pretty much like US people - most are pretty decent. It's their government that is the issue.1) Russian people , I don't believe they would not harm us.
Then why are they invading other countries to expand?Their population is lower then ours, they have more territory then we , so they would not care to occupy us.
Yep. And we made sure that we dropped two atomic bombs on Japan in part to warn Russia that they better not try anything after the war. That, of course, led to the arms race.Russian were our allies during the world war 11 ,
I don't want to "put them down" because they "want to be conservative in their moral system." They can have any moral system they want. However, I oppose their cyberattacks on the US. Do you?Now let me ask , why are we pushing our system in everybody's thought . If they want to be conservative in their moral system .
Why do we want to put them down always .