Well quite clearly you did not know advanced Big Bang theory that provides the prequel of events , who is clueless ?
Before the Big Bang, was there an unspecified volume of spatial points ?
- Thread starter Mohat
- Start date
- Status
Nor do you, liar.
I have already explained to you the prequel of events , if you cant accept that q1/R^n and q2/R^n make up the CBMR that is your problem .
No you didn't explain.
You just posted some made up crap that you can't substantiate.
More bullshit, liar.
Last edited:
Ok , why don't you explain it to us all then , I am sure you have touched many young minds with your physics , come on impress us ?
And another deflection from the liar.
You'll try anything to avoid admitting that you can't substantiate one single shred of your made up drivel, won't you?
Any given point cannot be created or destroyed is self evidence
Is it?
Only on video, so that really wouldn't count as "observing".
The word is "affected". And how would you know that "space wasn't affected"?
The space was still there after the blast and continues to be there to this day !
Additionally I have presented the question to various places and it is impossible to even think of a way to destroy space .
Give me one way to destroy space or you have to agree in the axiom
Not the same as "unaffected".
It's not up to me to "disprove". You're the one that made the claim therefore it's up to you to support it.
So you admit that you haven't actually "observed nuclear explosions"?
I have observed mushrooms
It isn't up to me to prove space cannot be destroyed , space not being destroying proves itself . Even the Suns energy cannot destroy space .
It is self evident , an axiom .
Mushrooms aren't nuclear explosions.
According to you, at least.
According to you, at least.
But then again, we know you're a liar.
If you are making the claim yes it is up to you
When Virtual Particals pop into existence in empty space does the
- empty space get destroyed? or
- pushed aside to another location?
If you are making the claim yes it is up to you
When Virtual Particals pop into existence in empty space does the
- empty space get destroyed? or
- pushed aside to another location?
Neither
q1/R^n
q2/R^n
Opposite charged electrostatic point charges popping into existence before they are finally annihilated by F<E . I say finally because there is a two stage process that happens in an almost instant duration to create the w= E/R^n
More made up bullshit.
Based on Dirac's work and Coulombs work ! You really need to think .
But you've already comprehensively shown that you don't understand Coulomb's work (and I'm willing to bet that anything you think you understand about Dirac's is deeply flawed), ergo: made up bullshit.
1. Are you trying to say that a photons speed of travel is a consequence of a force and the force is an attractive force like gravity ?
2. Are you saying that this attractive force is caused by a state of magnitude , of energy ?
3. Are you saying that light is separated throughout the Universe by this state ?
I think he is saying that the speed of light is consequence of an external force and this force is something to do with the magnitude of energy .
- Status