Ban Proud Muslim?

Ban Proud Muslim?


  • Total voters
    80
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
So what, there are people who have submitted many many many more useless posts than spurious.
And at least the monkey is not spreading ranting propaganda threads everywhere he goes.
 
Arditezza said:
Yes, I clicked on your username and did a "Find all posts...". .

Wait a sec. Maybe you should now click on see all threads that I created. I will give you a small selection from them. I must admit I weeded out the crap, but maybe you can wrap your giant brain around some of them and contribute something intelligent to them

Let us look at some of the threads I started then:

- Natural selection past the reproductive age
-The emergence of New religions based upon popular culture
-Can atheists really go to hell?
-Is there any scientific merit to creationism?
-Lamarck made a comeback
-TELEVISION - the new opium of the people
-Why tigers have stripes
-Can working in a lab cause infertility?
-Did segmentation in vertebrates and arthropods have a common origin?
-Decline of the Fittest - trophy hunting
-Penguins are Poop Shooters
-Why are many rows of teeth formed in sharks and not in humans'
-DNA Microarray - pitfalls and possibilities
-couch potato
-Evolution: time for some change?
-Are children smarter than adults?
-big brain and human evolution
-Is regeneration in the brain harmful?
-Be Smart and a Duck
-intelligent Design
-The Joy of Sex
-On the size of our brain and evolution and stuff (technical term for things)
-public speaking
-animal experimention - mistreating animals
 
Arditezza said:
Yes, I clicked on your username and did a "Find all posts...". If you can't see the evidence there, then you are much worse off than I originally thought. The lack of content alone is something to be ashamed of, but going further your can see your "me too" and "I agree" posts pretty plainly. 10+ posts a day over two years, most of which (at least since my time here) haven't been very thought provoking. Are you denying that? Most of your posts seem to be in support or against a particular poster, and not even the ideas and opinions of that poster. Your profile is correct though, you are indeed being too negative.
So what? He agrees when he wants to and disagrees when he wants to. What's your point?

And I actually can't believe that you've gone through all his posts to count how many 'I agree' and 'me too' he may have posted. :eek:

Me thinks you need a hobby... :(
 
Bells said:
So what? He agrees when he wants to and disagrees when he wants to. What's your point?

And I actually can't believe that you've gone through all his posts to count how many 'I agree' and 'me too' he may have posted. :eek:

Me thinks you need a hobby... :(

I never counted a thing. The 10+ posts per day is right there in the profile, and I only needed to view the first page and to review my past readings of his threads to verify my point. I'm at work, and wouldn't waste that much time on anyone. I do find it ironic that spurious deleted from his list all the posts started by him that had little to no value. Shows that he knows he does a huge amount of frivolous posting.

My point was that he's agrees because of the person, not the post and that makes his opinion less than that of someone who actually read the posts, and thought about their response to the situation. I don't like people who don't think. I don't like people who follow and don't use brain for a higher purpose. I hold their opinion in very low regard. For him, he agrees that PM should be banned because everyone else thinks so, not because of his personal objection. If it was because of his personal opinion, he should state that.
 
I disagree with you there Arditezza. I've seen Spurious stand up to everyone on certain matters. I see him agree when he thinks it's right for him to agree and I see him disagree for the same reason. He is the last person I would ever classify as a sheep. His reasons for voting yes to ban PM are his own, but I've seen him argue and disagree with PM before anyone else even had a chance to. He speaks his own mind as you speak your own mind. And he did state that it was his personal opinion. He too found many that PM posted on here offensive. What else did you expect him to do? Post a list of why or why not something may or may not offend him? Spurious is the last person on here I'd ever think was not using their brain for a higher purpose. I think that you are being extremely unfair.
 
You are now classified as a mindless drone.


Thanks for being so nice, you must degrade yourself by calling others with names. I stated my opinion, you can either take it or leave it but calling me names only shows how small of intellect you must have.


Go and read your propaganda threads and leave us alone. We want reasonable discussion here. If you know the truth you have no reason to come here. You know everything already

spuriousmonkey,(what you mean with leave us alone) let me refresh ur memory it,s not your bed room it,s a discussion forum an open forum with open policies, whenever i want i join share my opinion when i want i leave, i don,t need ur permission for that...
 
alain said:
"what a nonsense! give us just one reason why Proud Muslim should be banned from this site,"
1) He is racist (against americans)
2) he is highly offensive and hasnt learnt the meaning of the word tact
3) he was banned in a previous incarnation, 'proud syrian'
4) excessive propoganda
5) biased aganst jews
6) insults people instead of arguing
theres plentya reasons

"only cause he dare to say the truth,this site is worth visiting only cause of PM..."
you do realise that you insulted over 5000 people just then right??


"he always raise intresting subject thats why his threads get the most of Hits Most Replies......you ppl are so jealous...."

no actually, his threads get more hits because he raises the most contraversial issues, i could start a thread hacking out on something that everyone loves and itd get heaps of replies.


alain.... Respect is a two-way street. If you don't respect someone else's religious belief's or religious personalities, than do not expect them to respect yours...i notice that many times members like (doctor no), using profanity against islam,and prophets.. where was the moderators of this site to ban him,there are many other posters who disrespect islam muslims in their comments, no one say a word... i thought moderators are not here to take sides in arguments or to prove one or other sect right..i thought the moderators here to help provide a good atmosphere for discussion..but i was wrong moderators of this site are racist as well..they banned PM just cause he was a muslim and second he defend his religion.
 
stacy said:
alain.... Respect is a two-way street. If you don't respect someone else's religious belief's or religious personalities, than do not expect them to respect yours...i notice that many times members like (doctor no), using profanity against islam,and prophets.. where was the moderators of this site to ban him,there are many other posters who disrespect islam muslims in their comments, no one say a word... i thought moderators are not here to take sides in arguments or to prove one or other sect right..i thought the moderators here to help provide a good atmosphere for discussion..but i was wrong moderators of this site are racist as well..they banned PM just cause he was a muslim and second he defend his religion.
That's what you fail to understand stacy. Even when PM is shown respect, he still insults you regardless. I've seen many members on here partake in discussions about something or other and never once did they say anything about Islam or Muslims and PM would enter the thread and post things about how Christianity is a false religion, etc. Do you expect those members to sit back and say nothing to him? And you are wrong. Many here have much to say to the posters who disrespect Islam, and even when such members defend Islam or Muslims, PM still finds a way of insulting them because they may be an athiest, agnostic, christian, etc. As you say, respect is a two way street and many of us are sick of PM crying foul when he partakes in the same if not worse behaviour at times.

PM was not banned because he is a Muslim or because he defends his religion. PM was banned for not heeding a warning about a particular statement he kept on making in here. There are many Muslim participants on this forum, PM is not the only one. Are you possibly saying that PM should get special consideration because he's a Muslim? Why should he? If that is the case then Christians, Jews, Hindus, Athiests, Agnostics, Buddhists, Satanists, Pagans, etc should also get the same special consideration for their beliefs. Most of us have gotten warnings from time to time about our behaviour on here, but the reason that most of us aren't banned is because we heed those warning. Or at least we try to. PM did not.
 
PM is a racist who also hates racism and he only promotes hates toward people who are not muslims. I voted yes.
 
"but i was wrong moderators of this site are racist as well..they banned PM just cause he was a muslim and second he defend his religion."


they arent racist, so be quiet, and if they banned him for defnding his religion, someone nneds to tell PM that
"offenese is the best form of defence"

doesnt actually apply to all circumstances
 
ok guys lets forget all this and start a new poll lets vote PM as a new moderator of religion forum he deserve to be a moderator, sounds cool :D
 
I'll make a deal with you stacy. I'll vote for PM for moderator when I start to sprout angel wings from my back. Ok? I think that sounds like a reasonable deal.
 
Arditezza said:
I never counted a thing. The 10+ posts per day is right there in the profile, and I only needed to view the first page and to review my past readings of his threads to verify my point. I'm at work, and wouldn't waste that much time on anyone. I do find it ironic that spurious deleted from his list all the posts started by him that had little to no value. Shows that he knows he does a huge amount of frivolous posting.

My point was that he's agrees because of the person, not the post and that makes his opinion less than that of someone who actually read the posts, and thought about their response to the situation. I don't like people who don't think. I don't like people who follow and don't use brain for a higher purpose. I hold their opinion in very low regard. For him, he agrees that PM should be banned because everyone else thinks so, not because of his personal objection. If it was because of his personal opinion, he should state that.

You are so full of it.

Did you ever to bother to read my lectures on my website?

Did you ever bother to read for instance my paper in development?

I probably have more original ideas in a day than you had in your entire life.
 
"ok guys lets forget all this and start a new poll lets vote PM as a new moderator of religion forum he deserve to be a moderator, sounds cool"

stacy, no-one is stopping you from starting that poll, start it if you want, if it gets a majority of yes's, then you can tell porf about it and we'll see what happens

but i wouldnt waste your time, hes barely managing to avoid getting banned, hes not gonna become a mod
 
i meant a permenant ban
i dunno, just watch the post count on the religion section, when it doubles, it means PM is back
 
he must be busy collecting links for cut & paste riot for the 4th day. you should watch for the post count increasing exponentially.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top