ha, but im better than all of you cause i NEVER do it.
Arditezza said:Yes, I clicked on your username and did a "Find all posts...". .
So what? He agrees when he wants to and disagrees when he wants to. What's your point?Arditezza said:Yes, I clicked on your username and did a "Find all posts...". If you can't see the evidence there, then you are much worse off than I originally thought. The lack of content alone is something to be ashamed of, but going further your can see your "me too" and "I agree" posts pretty plainly. 10+ posts a day over two years, most of which (at least since my time here) haven't been very thought provoking. Are you denying that? Most of your posts seem to be in support or against a particular poster, and not even the ideas and opinions of that poster. Your profile is correct though, you are indeed being too negative.
Bells said:So what? He agrees when he wants to and disagrees when he wants to. What's your point?
And I actually can't believe that you've gone through all his posts to count how many 'I agree' and 'me too' he may have posted.![]()
Me thinks you need a hobby...![]()
You are now classified as a mindless drone.
Go and read your propaganda threads and leave us alone. We want reasonable discussion here. If you know the truth you have no reason to come here. You know everything already
alain said:"what a nonsense! give us just one reason why Proud Muslim should be banned from this site,"
1) He is racist (against americans)
2) he is highly offensive and hasnt learnt the meaning of the word tact
3) he was banned in a previous incarnation, 'proud syrian'
4) excessive propoganda
5) biased aganst jews
6) insults people instead of arguing
theres plentya reasons
"only cause he dare to say the truth,this site is worth visiting only cause of PM..."
you do realise that you insulted over 5000 people just then right??
"he always raise intresting subject thats why his threads get the most of Hits Most Replies......you ppl are so jealous...."
no actually, his threads get more hits because he raises the most contraversial issues, i could start a thread hacking out on something that everyone loves and itd get heaps of replies.
That's what you fail to understand stacy. Even when PM is shown respect, he still insults you regardless. I've seen many members on here partake in discussions about something or other and never once did they say anything about Islam or Muslims and PM would enter the thread and post things about how Christianity is a false religion, etc. Do you expect those members to sit back and say nothing to him? And you are wrong. Many here have much to say to the posters who disrespect Islam, and even when such members defend Islam or Muslims, PM still finds a way of insulting them because they may be an athiest, agnostic, christian, etc. As you say, respect is a two way street and many of us are sick of PM crying foul when he partakes in the same if not worse behaviour at times.stacy said:alain.... Respect is a two-way street. If you don't respect someone else's religious belief's or religious personalities, than do not expect them to respect yours...i notice that many times members like (doctor no), using profanity against islam,and prophets.. where was the moderators of this site to ban him,there are many other posters who disrespect islam muslims in their comments, no one say a word... i thought moderators are not here to take sides in arguments or to prove one or other sect right..i thought the moderators here to help provide a good atmosphere for discussion..but i was wrong moderators of this site are racist as well..they banned PM just cause he was a muslim and second he defend his religion.
Arditezza said:I never counted a thing. The 10+ posts per day is right there in the profile, and I only needed to view the first page and to review my past readings of his threads to verify my point. I'm at work, and wouldn't waste that much time on anyone. I do find it ironic that spurious deleted from his list all the posts started by him that had little to no value. Shows that he knows he does a huge amount of frivolous posting.
My point was that he's agrees because of the person, not the post and that makes his opinion less than that of someone who actually read the posts, and thought about their response to the situation. I don't like people who don't think. I don't like people who follow and don't use brain for a higher purpose. I hold their opinion in very low regard. For him, he agrees that PM should be banned because everyone else thinks so, not because of his personal objection. If it was because of his personal opinion, he should state that.