You realize a pharma (pharmacy I presume?) is just the dispenser of said medication... they don't develop or prescribe...
Cures
You realize a pharma (pharmacy I presume?) is just the dispenser of said medication... they don't develop or prescribe...
Polio, rabies, whooping cough...Well ...true .
But what diseases have been cured by pharma's ?
Polio, rabies, whooping cough...
Note that it's usually scientists and doctors that find the cures, pharma just manufactures the drugs. And they can treat far more ailments than can be cured, like mental illness.
It seems that is not in the interest of the pharmaceutical industry to come up with cures for illnesses.
If you cure the illness, you lose a customer.
It seems that is not in the interest of the pharmaceutical industry to come up with cures for illnesses.
If you cure the illness, you lose a customer.
Some people get cured more or less.Fair enough
Treat mental illness ... ?
Note cancer by pharma has not been cured .
And yet they do. Must be a flaw in your reasoning somewhere.It seems that is not in the interest of the pharmaceutical industry to come up with cures for illnesses.
Cured? Not as such... But when I was a child in the 1960s cancer was pretty much a death sentence. Today I know many cancer survivors. Treatment has come a long way.Note cancer by pharma has not been cured .
Only a very few things are we able to understand - let alone treat - the cause much of what Medicine can do nowadays is merely treat the symptoms.
Well, that turns out to be problematic.what does this actually mean? I am sure all those people who exhibit the symptoms of bipolar, and the like, are glad that there are drugs that treat those symptoms.
The chemical imbalance, is itself, a symptom of a deeper underlying cause.But don't those same drugs also treat the cause of those symptoms, the chemical imbalance? sure, we haven't, as yet, the technology to alter a persons genome in situ, which would help cure bipolar.
Well, that turns out to be problematic.
Which is kinda my point. Despite what people similar to the OP might think we do not yet have the technology to address the cause, just the effect.
Only if the drugs fix the genetic defect itself (which I don't see happening yet). Otherwise, all were really doing is treating the effects.but if the cause is a chemical imbalance, due to a genetic defect, and you correct that chemical imbalance with drugs, then isn't that treating the cause?
We don't know what causes bipolar and most mental disorders. All we know is some drugs help people live with it.but if the cause is a chemical imbalance, due to a genetic defect, and you correct that chemical imbalance with drugs, then isn't that treating the cause?
Only if the drugs fix the genetic defect itself (which I don't see happening yet). Otherwise, all were really doing is treating the effects.
We don't know what causes bipolar and most mental disorders. All we know is some drugs help people live with it.
A consensus among mental health professionals in cooperation with many institutions of society, including patients, universities, communities, and governmental agencies.What is the evidence that these disorders actually exist in the first place ?