Arab propaganda...

marv

Just a dumb hillbilly...
Registered Senior Member
Notice anything wrong with this al-Reuters photo of Beirut, courtesy of the Arab photography/reporting staff:

2006_08_05t152933_450x304_us_mideast.jpg


:D :D :D
 
marv said:
Notice anything wrong with this al-Reuters photo of Beirut, courtesy of the Arab photography/reporting staff:

2006_08_05t152933_450x304_us_mideast.jpg


:D :D :D


you are right. No one is bombing beruit. Fucking liars, there is no war over there, they are just arab propaganda. Not a single civilian has died so far and we know it. Only people are killed are in israel and cnn and fox are the living proof. There have been not a single bombing of a bridge or hospital or a civilan buildings. Bunch of liars, don't you agree with me marv?
 
I think the point is that whoever edited this photo (and it could have been anyone from an arab to an eskimo for all we know) exagerrated the devastation in the scene. The smoke was cloned to fill the sky rather than just a few lonely spires of smoke.

However, it was done so ineptly, that I doubt it was done seriously.

Could be wrong though. Who knows?
 
Not only was the clone brush clumsy with the smoke, they also duplicated some buildings in the lower left. I guess they were in a hurry to get it out.
 
invert_nexus said:
I think the point is that whoever edited this photo (and it could have been anyone from an arab to an eskimo for all we know) exagerrated the devastation in the scene.

we all know the eskimo people's tendency toward zionist radicalism.....

fucking snow loving bastard-o's.
 
sounds like a clever way of inciting people to criticise arab propaganda.

i can think of another "clever" example,

make it look like a commercial plane was flown into the pentagon, (actually fly something else into the only section that was empty of staff due to being renovated) and blame it on people from the country you want to invade -
oh wait, thats already been done.
 
Huwy said:
sounds like a clever way of inciting people to criticise arab propaganda.

i can think of another "clever" example,

make it look like a commercial plane was flown into the pentagon, (actually fly something else into the only section that was empty of staff due to being renovated) and blame it on people from the country you want to invade -
oh wait, thats already been done.

Either that was great sarcasm or unbelievable ignorance.

At any rate, good job at exposing stupidity in its highest form.

As for the topic, it is so obvious that the JOOOOOOOOS did it! Just like HINDOOOS go to great lengths to attack themselves so they can blame it on muslims. And those Buddha statues in Afghanistan that blew up? Its so obvious that those dastardly buddhists in Afghanistan [all 4 who are left] carried out those acts of vandalism, you know, so they could get world opinion on their side. And don't even mention the London or Madrid bombings! Those Europeans have been looking for an excuse to get rid of the millions of muslims in their midsts for a long time now, so why not stage a train bombing and blame muslims for it? Brilliant!

Man, when will the world leave all the poor muslims alone! :(
 
centuries from now,..assuming there is gonna be any, people will look upon this conflict and say what a waste of good video film!! :D
 
Vega said:
centuries from now,..assuming there is gonna be any, people will look upon this conflict and say what a waste of good video film!! :D

That and they will be wondering why the hell the civilized world put up with Islamic fascism and expansionism for so long.

Besides, film [and hopefully Islam] will be antiquitated and a mere curiosity by then so hold on to any current footage you have - it may ensure financial stability for your descendents (and valuable information to historians wishing to understand the medieval mentality of Islam).
 
Zephyr said:
Same reason they put up with the crusades...

Ahhhhh yes.....the old "but, but, but teh Christians@!1!!111!!!" argument. :rolleyes:

So do we have to "wait it out" until muslims have their own reformation? Should we just allow all the mindless violence to continue unabated just because the Christians had their crusdades?

Or rather, since we are living in an age of free-thought and humanistic values, should we tackle the problem head on instead of drawing pointless analogies to events that happened 10 centuries ago?
 
I don't think anyone thinks the problem shouldn't be tackled. It's how it should be tackled...
 
Fair enough....

But one has to agree that there can only be *so* many options and chances before the problem should be rectified forcefully.....

EDIT: ....AND Permanently.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top