No , you're denying the provided demonstration and adding a time value to be equivalent to a frequency .
Nope. Time is the INVERSE of frequency. That's basic math. Change one and you change the other.
Here's an example. Let's say you orbit a GPS satellite and do _not_ compensate for time dilation. It will be off by about 38 microseconds a day. This means that, without compensation, GPS will not work; you need better than 20 _nanoseconds_ accuracy to hit GPS requirements, which means you'd be out of spec within 30 minutes after launch.
You can express this error two ways:
Normally a GPS atomic clock provides a frequency of 6,834,682,610 Hz. But after you launch it you will see that clock sending down a frequency equivalent to 6,834,682,613 Hz.
Another way to look at it is that while that clock is on the ground, it will generate 5.905x10^16 pulses per day. In orbit it will generate 259,727 more pulses per day than it does on the ground.
Those two facts are the same.
It's called observer effect and has no other value other than that of the practitioner , fantasy make believe and not objective.
Agreed. "Objective" means unaffected by your opinion.
GPS clocks run at a different speed in orbit due to time dilation, and must be compensated to work correctly. That is an objective fact, no matter how much fantasy and make believe you throw at it, and no matter what your opinion on the topic is.
Reality always trumps your opinion.