f charisma and *******.
********? X-factor is *******>>>????
f charisma and *******.
I think Alexander is highly overrated. Whats the big deal about a man with megalomania?
You don't appreciate the brilliance, vigor, valor, bravery, and leadership he displayed in battle. He conquered the known world at his tender age, defeating various armies with ingenious ideas. He killed a lot of people? So what? We don't judge him for his army's bloodshed. The man was one of the greatest conquerers of all time.
Alexander died of an illness on his way home - not wounds.
As to why he turned back, it was due to (in all likelihood) the size of the Indian cavalry and the sheer savageness of them. India's history is filled to the brim with uncensored bloodshed, so perhaps the task of conquering all of India seemed to be too great a risk to what Alexander had already accoplished.
Seems plausible.
Alexander the Merely Mediocre? Sounds like bitter Indian talk to me. I can't say I blame them, though - I'd be bitter too if Alexander wiped the floor with my nation. Of course Alexander won battles in India - completely destroyed cities like Masaga (spelling?) help prove this (among many other things). Alexander's conquest of India was one of the reasons the Indians unified to form the Mauryan empire.
No, they said to themselves, "hey, we've practically conquered the entire world, and have all the riches imaginable. Why bother with these self-warring savages?"
Did Pearl Harbour attack mean Japs had practically conquered whole of USA?
There is a 3rd option, it was either a draw or a Pyrrhic victory. Either way, it was just not cost effective to continue.
Everything in life is a risk/reward thingy. Is it worthy to steal that wallet? How about cheating on my significant other? Should I continue and try to conquer India or let's call it quit? Does the possible reward justifiy the taken risk???
He probably did the calculation and decided that there is such a thing as too big of an empire. It is really hard to run a giant empire, specially without internet and emails.... Kind of hard to communicate...
Not analogous at all.
There is a 3rd option, it was either a draw or a Pyrrhic victory. Either way, it was just not cost effective to continue.
Everything in life is a risk/reward thingy. Is it worthy to steal that wallet? How about cheating on my significant other? Should I continue and try to conquer India or let's call it quit? Does the possible reward justifiy the taken risk???
He probably did the calculation and decided that there is such a thing as too big of an empire. It is really hard to run a giant empire, specially without internet and emails.... Kind of hard to communicate...
Even the best historians wildly speculate that ill-fated decision. He sent most of his force to what is modern Iraq, left enough to enforce power over satraps, and then this expeditionary force across the Gedrosia abyss. Since he commissioned a fleet to explore waters off arabia - he probably wanted to take lands from the sea, rather than cross a huge army over the desert and I suspect they grossly underestimated one of the most horrible places on earth. Having lost 3/4 of the men on that trek he probably abandoned any ideas of taking lands in southern arabia.
Some historians think he was punishing the men for going no further in India and the causes of that mutiny are also wildly debated, from general exhaustion to veterans actually being pissed they might not get to campaign as he was sending them home as "thanks" or maybe to avoid them assassinating him...the joys of being the big guy on top of the pile...
Whereas those of us not of Indian descent find that Indians, in particular, tend to react very violently to the notion that they could ever have actually been beaten, even if only temporarily.I have found that Europeans (and Americans of European descent) react particularly violently to the title and the narrative.
india was world power at that time.Alexander the Merely Mediocre? Sounds like bitter Indian talk to me. I can't say I blame them, though - I'd be bitter too if Alexander wiped the floor with my nation. Of course Alexander won battles in India - completely destroyed cities like Masaga (spelling?) help prove this (among many other things). Alexander's conquest of India was one of the reasons the Indians unified to form the Mauryan empire.
their is still lots of gold, diamonds stolen.If we give back the Kohinoor and the Elgin marbles and the antiquities of Egypt we'll have hardly any loot left.