Define nothing, or is it without definition and anything else, including "potential."
Nothing is the complete opposite of something ;
Something has depth , breadth , length and movement
Nothing has no potential .
Define nothing, or is it without definition and anything else, including "potential."
That is not a definition.Nothing is the complete opposite of something ;
That is not a definition.
^^^I think you should look for the answer from the linguists, or should that be languagers?...![]()
Write4U said: ↑
I think you should look for the answer from the linguists, or should that be languagers?.
The studiers of languistics....^^^
Linguers.
Not really, in linguistics you should look for the rare words, which ascribe authorship.No
You should look for the answer in simplicity and complexity .
Not really, in linguistics you should look for the rare words, which ascribe authorship.
Strangely the NSA has made a science of this.
In furtherance of our discussion of temperature in the thread; Can you completely destroy a Dimension, I hope this might be the more appropriate forum.
Something just occurred to me.
If I may pose a question first to offer the background for my following posit.
Is it possible that -1 K can exist, or is 0 K the absolute absence of temperature? If 0 K is in fact absolute zero temperature., then should it not follow that the temperature scale begins at 0 K.?
If that is the case then all other measurements must be relative degrees of warmth. +1 K is warmer than 0 k and every measurement above that are in reality degrees of warmth relative to absolute zero K, regardless whether we call it -19 C or -20 F (both below freezing point), these measurements will always be warmer than 0 K.
Came to mind, in a state (condition) of infinitely large and infinitely small nothingness, what would be its temperature. If o K is the absolute absence of any temperature (warmth), can we say that at least one property of nothingness is 0 K. (the absence of any temperature)?
I'll stop here to see if I am failing to understand the concept of nothingness.
Right, zero degrees Kelvin.Nothingness has no temperature .
Right, zero degrees Kelvin.
Remember this is the condition before hydrogen even existsNo , hydrogen becomes a liquid .
Remember this is the condition before hydrogen even exists
Can there be -1 K ?
Temperature is a measurement of the bulk movement of particles.Remember this is the condition before hydrogen even exists
Can there be -1 K ?
Thus my question, if there is an infinitely large and infinitely small state or condition of absence of matter and movement do we have condition of absolute zero temperature?Temperature is a measurement of the bulk movement of particles.
No matter = no particles = no temperature.
Lexical statistics. See below @ 45:20 . If you haven't seen it yet, the whole lecture begins @ 25:10.An example ...
Remember this is the condition before hydrogen even exists
Can there be -1 K ?
Not really. I more or less agree with Dave, save that any black body radiation present can be taken to be equivalent to matter at a defined temperature. In your scenario you have an absence of energy, but that isn't really the same as an absolute zero temperature.Thus my question, if there is an infinitely large and infinitely small state or condition of absence of matter and movement do we have condition of absolute zero temperature?
I am taking the viewpoint that nothingness still represent a permittive condition.
How do we ever get to zero temperature if there is thermodynamic energy. Only total motionless.Not really. I more or less agree with Dave, save that any black body radiation present can be taken to be equivalent to matter at a defined temperature. In your scenario you have an absence of energy, but that isn't really the same as an absolute zero temperature.