A simple proof of common telepathic connectivity

Quantum Quack said:
Scenario "Two people talking to each other on a telephone."
One party stops listening.
The other party knows "somehow" that the respondent person has stopped listening and is distracted.
"Are you listening to me?" or " You are not listening are you?" or "I'll call later when you are more receptive" are all common accusations/questions.
Click to expand...
This would only mean something if they where only actually correct about it most of the time. I have found that other people will say, yes, yep, ya, so one etc between everything someone says. I can't help but ask myself why they would do this, it seems like it would be so annoying. Well, I think it may just be a case where a person has just been accused of not listening when they have. So then they feel like they have to go to an extreme in order to prove that they are listening before they are even asked. I think in most cases it could be just because their relationship is on the rocks with someone else, then that person tends to make false accusations at them because they are displeased with them. This wouldn't mean that they are telepathic. I don't think it means that someone that doesn't respond between every sentence is not listening, like me I will probably never do that just because I don't feel like it should really be necessary. The other person should be able to deal with their insecurities but I think most of the time they never will unless you put up some kind of effort like a dog waiting for a treat from its master.
 
Layman said:
This would only mean something if they where only actually correct about it most of the time. I have found that other people will say, yes, yep, ya, so one etc between everything someone says. I can't help but ask myself why they would do this, it seems like it would be so annoying. Well, I think it may just be a case where a person has just been accused of not listening when they have. So then they feel like they have to go to an extreme in order to prove that they are listening before they are even asked. I think in most cases it could be just because their relationship is on the rocks with someone else, then that person tends to make false accusations at them because they are displeased with them. This wouldn't mean that they are telepathic. I don't think it means that someone that doesn't respond between every sentence is not listening, like me I will probably never do that just because I don't feel like it should really be necessary. The other person should be able to deal with their insecurities but I think most of the time they never will unless you put up some kind of effort like a dog waiting for a treat from its master.
Click to expand...

Possibly you could offer an opinion after reading post #34?

Does it alter your understanding of he questions raised in the OP?
 
EinsteinHimself said:
In order to know or guess what someone is thinking you have to be aware of all the senses. Your own emotions for example play a huge role in the thought of the person your speaking with. Now this isn't a sense per se as it is more of an awareness. Let's say you were to study depriving all but one sense in an experiment. It would strengthen not only that sense but you would be more aware of the other senses after deprivation. So later If we were to deprive you of all the senses you could be more aware of an observers thoughts based just upon your own emotions and what a person might think of when they were bored in that environment. A person could passively display this idea in themselves and have trouble trying to recreate it in another.

Smell is the most subconscious of senses, though all of them are able to connect to another's emotional state, because when we feel a certain way our pheromones express that emotion to those around us. We say we have smelled this before and understand the experience collectively. As opposed to "I am making my thoughts transfer into your mind" it becomes "we are sharing the same thoughts because we both understand our respective emotional states".
Click to expand...
You refer to what I label "Extension by Deprivation". An incredibly powerful and always "painful" therapy tool.
Typically for example if a person wished to improve their hearing then they would blindfold themselves for extended periods of time in an environment where sight is usually needed to function fully. [ like traveling on public transport etc]
It is also interesting that you should mention "the sense of smell"?

Any ideas on what we are actually smelling?
Example of the problem: eyes see light [ photons ], ears hear sound sound waves [ vibrations ] however smell smells what? :)
Further more I believe you to be absolutely correct when you say "emotions" play a huge part in any sensory capability. Most modern Westerners are running about 10% of their sensory potential due to emotional, denial, and paranoia issues.
 
Smells are the chemicals themselves. It is as if someone shoved a flower into your head, when really all that happened was a chemical floated off one and landed in a receptor. This is why smell triggers memory the best. You get the most real part of reality downloaded into your DNA.

Allergies are a physical touch response and the most common are experienced through the nose.

Quantum Quack said:
Most modern Westerners are running about 10% of their sensory potential due to emotional, denial, and paranoia issues.
Click to expand...

Boy ain't that the truth! It's almost like in school we teach them to be a one trick pony.

"Sure you can do anything!!!! Except understand how "(ultra)-sensory perceptions" allow you to understand everything"

Apparently if you use too much of your brain people try to fry eggs on your scalp!
 
Apparently if you use too much of your brain people try to fry eggs on your scalp!
Click to expand...
hmmm I like that... ha and very true. I could write a book on it....
Smells are the chemicals themselves. It is as if someone shoved a flower into your head, when really all that happened was a chemical floated off one and landed in a receptor. This is why smell triggers memory the best. You get the most real part of reality downloaded into your DNA.
Click to expand...
I believe this is debatable. Another thread, another time perhaps...
 
Go for it. I'll read it. I just enjoy the light conversation

It wasn't meant to be completely literal, but it is nice to see someone familiar with the senses.
 
LOL. i'm inclined to represent my pre-cognizance in such a manner as they did on Irobot.

"My responses are limited, You must ask the right question." LOL
 
Daybreak said:
I can't even google that word.
Click to expand...
Not surprising... I first read it used in a fictional novel years ago. The word it self is not so much the issue it is the meaning of it, that is incredibly difficult to convey. Some ancient Sanskrit alludes to it's definition but I would have to do some serious research to find an English correlation.

Try:
Movie: Avatar: Bond between pilot and dragon/bird creature.
Movie: Avatar: Sensility: connection between native indigenous and forest [ particular the main tree ]

Broadly speaking "sensility" could be defined as a heightened state of empathic sensory connectivity to the point where the sensory input of a person is experienced by another. Defined with in the context of the "Kāmikā-tantra" [ or simply Tantra]

Edit: quick research:

Example: an aspect of "sensility" in practice [ common] =>

Tantric sensuality requires as it's foundation the ability for sensual enmeshment, sensual intimacy, sensual knowledge about the other party(s) sensual state. A form of "sensility" or "sensory" connectivity.
 
Is that like reiki?
no wonder so many women like to **** me
they are all so afraid to touch me
but when they do they just can't get enough
 
Daybreak said:
Is that like reiki?
no wonder so many women like to **** me
they are all so afraid to touch me
but when they do they just can't get enough
Click to expand...
"Touch Paranoia" is one of the biggest obstacles to deal with in any ones life.
Especially due to homophobia amongst men. [men touching men - platonic-ally]
 
imagination is key
it runs from mind to body
in instinct of the find
where to touch decides how much
fascination we give to another

no thought is to much
to be ill received through the touch
My brother.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top