What is really your problem, woman?
And by the way Kunax is right, Invert did bribe me.
That you even dared to try 'playing' with me, as those slavs you call women in the real world allow you to.What is really your problem, woman?
Expecting a reply.I am fucking serious
You should have been the one nominated for this shit, considering your tripe:I've been seeing these awards for the entire year that I'm here, and neither I, nor my favorite posters are ever nominated. The awards have always seemed like creepy crap.
You bribed him?
What the fuck are on about? Most girls I sleep with are personality-wise, just like you. I enjoy the chase. And how did I try "playing" with you?gendanken said:That you even dared to try 'playing' with me, as those slavs you call women in the real world allow you to.
You replied, except not in a pm, but then again I wasn't expecting you to.So fuckhead sends me this in a PM labeled "Why must you always be on my dick":
Expecting a reply.
What wish would that be? I've probably 100+ nonsensical pms from you. And you are on my dick-- straddling the fat thing like you've best cursed with little ones on pathetic guys all your life. Aka, get off my case.Again, with the bloody wishful thinking he and the other flies cling on to.
Coulda sworn you were all noise. But your vitroil was fascinating THEN, for I still couldn't predict ya.Gendanken on that fat, thick, Caribbean dick huh?
Didn't I maul you once in a "look!" thread?
Coulda sworn it was you, Sambo.
Shut up invert, I threw a bone, allow the correct dog to pick up.I didn't bribe shit. I've never even talked to FountainHed other than this thread and a few words in the poem thread.
Hellatious.I've probably 100+ nonsensical pms from you
Nexus said:I didn't bribe shit. I've never even talked to FountainHed other than this thread and a few words in the poem thread.
RosaMagika said:Some useful advice for you: If you get bitten by a shark, push the snout up, and the shark will let go.
thefountainhed said:Criteria:
1. Makes well-developed and supported arguments devoid of obsessive generalizations and fallacies (especially ad hominen).
2. Provides original and enlightening perspectives otherwise missed by the masses.
3. Presents a valid viewpoint regardless of backlash
4. Language
5. Posts within the past 3 months (100+)
This especially annoys me considering you were of the original bunch that hijacked and plummeted this thread into shit.Never wrestle a pig: you'll be covered with shit, and the pig will like it.
What the hell are you talking about? This is like talking to a thick wall. I wil not take you off the list. I don't care if you scream off the highest peak on kilimanjaro and monkey soldiers wearing AK47s come knocking on my bloody door. The list is as I see it.as I have reasons to believe that my nomination is a result of a biased judgement.
What delusional vision of sciforums do you have whereby the leading poster is somehow obscure? Is there any regular member who unaware of Tiassa? By virtue of his ability to use the language and effort in his posts alone he deserves to be on the bloody list. Who the hell is the obscure user on the list? Every individual on the list has 1000+ posts. Get the hell out of the cesspool.These awards are creepy. I think Fountainhed especially selects obscure candidates to make it seem like he's some kind of hip fan of underground sciforums. He's too cool for pop sciforums, apparently.
I mean last time tiassa won... tiassa
Really, really delusional Lou. Besides you already messed up the fabric of the universe earlier by cursing me. You get one chance.Tiassa and the word "won", "win", "winning" or "winner" being in the same sentence just doesn't seem right, like there's a glitch in the universe or something. Tiassa inherently goes with words like- lost, lose, losing, loser, etc.
Thats the reality I know and love. Way to upset the fabric of the universe hed.
Ahhh, so let's see. How's this list for you: wes 2 of N, 3 of N, 4 of N,....., spuriousmonkey, coolskilll, etc etc. more to your bloody taste?If you just genuinely selected the best rather than making obscure ?-inciting selections like some 14 year old goth telling other goths about her taste in music, we could avoid these bizarre mishaps.
Nah, I have a set of criteria that says:Invert better have bribed you, and gendanken better be riding your fat dick.
Or you better have some psychological disorder that makes you swoon over mediocrity.
Nope, but you obviously are. Shouldn't you get the fucking hint that if you haven't been posting or your posts have been cespool-worthy junk of overgeneralizing gibberish, then by virtue of criterion 1 you won't make the list no matter how much of a bitch you become? Rosa gets on the list out of the sheer volume of her posts of the past three months and on providing a different viewpoint.Basically what i'm getting at is- even though i haven't been posting lately, I should have been nominated purely because I have whined and complained every previous time you failed to nominate me. Are you some kind of moron? Why would you put yourself through this again?
Bend over like the bitch you are and after sticking your foot up your ass I might reconsider. But I very, very highly doubt it.Put me on the fucking list And don't give me any of that "criteria" bullshit either.