2020: Physics Nobel Prize:

POVphysics2 said:
Anyway, the physics community needs to get off their butts and do some real physics now.
Click to expand...
You wouldn't know real physics if it kicked you in the nutz.

How many physics courses have you taken? By the way, not understanding a wiki article does not count as a physics course.
 
origin said:
You wouldn't know real physics if it kicked you in the nutz.
Click to expand...

Today's physicists trying to unify QM with GR.
paleo-diet-cavemen.jpeg
 
I came to this forum with the best intentions, hoping to talk about physics. I found a lot of crappy people. I didn't find anybody who knew a damn thing about physics. These people claimed I didn't known anything about physics, but they never actually discussed anything with me. The people on this forum are crooked and deceitful. You are dishonest, rude and unfair. It is no surprise that they physics community can't make any meaningful progress. I can only hope that you all won't be around in a hundred years, maybe then some new breakthroughs will occur.
 
POVphysics2 said:
Sounds like you're just making stuff up. Can you be specific? Why are you mentioning de Broglie's relationship? I haven't actually talked about it in years. Yes I talked about wave functions, but you're comments are so thick headed, it's like you're attacking on autopilot without really engaging. Seriously, you're just saying things that have nothing to do with reality.

You're calling me a relativity crank, but it sounds to me like you are hallucinating things that I never said.

Hey! Exchemist! Snap out of it! Focus!
Click to expand...
In post 1 of the thread on the other forum, to which you referred in post 10 of this thread, you wrote this: " The speed of light c shows up in special relativity equations, the Einstein equations, DeBroglie wavelength and the basic wave equation c = lambda*f. "

Which is cobblers: c does not feature in de Broglie's relation. (c= fλ is not a wave equation by the way. A wave equation is a 2nd order partial differential equation. But that's another story.)

Anyway, you have been showing your lack of knowledge of physics from the start, while denying that you have anything to learn and calling others with actual physical science degrees ignorant. That is what pisses people off.

But on one thing I agree with you: a "Grand Trampling Exit", of the type you are now contemplating, would seem to be your best option.
 
Last edited:
exchemist said:
In post 1 of the thread on the other forum, to which you referred in post 10 of this thread, you wrote this: " The speed of light c shows up in special relativity equations, the Einstein equations, DeBroglie wavelength and the basic wave equation c = lambda*f. "

Which is cobblers: c does not feature in de Broglie's relation. (c= fλ is not a wave equation by the way, but that's another story.)

So you have been showing your ignorance from the start, while denying that you have anything to learn. That is what pisses people off.

But on one thing I agree with you: a "Grand Trampling Exit", of the type you are now contemplating, would seem to be your best option.
Click to expand...
I'm surprised you didn't take a print screen shot of it. Given the credibility of people on this forum, I have my doubts that your criticisms are valid.
 
I mean, honestly, I half expect the physics community to break down under it's own lack of accomplishments and unnecessarily complicated (un-insightful) efforts. There are massive holes in all the major theories.
 
While we're at it, can you explain why we care so much about the entropy of black holes? I mean, is this going to lead to a major breakthrough in technology some day? Like, are you going to invent the entropy drive or something? o_O
 
Can you explain to be how tiny little superstrings form together to create spacetime? I mean, my spaggetti doesn't act that way. Or, why is it that the arrow of time is in the direction of increasing entropy (which makes sense). So the big bang should be the point of minimum entropy. So, how does superstring spagetti get us to a minimum entropy?
 
Why does Quantum Loop gravity sound like chain mail? And how did it get there? And how is it compatible with big bang cosmology? Like I said, all the leading theories are garbage!
 
And have you physicists, you amazingly brilliant geniuses figured out how you're going to prove that you can recover the "information content" of objects dropped into a black hole after it evaporates after 10^10^10^42 years? I mean, the load of total bullshit is amazing! The kind of crap that physicists waste their careers on and get paid by college students and taxpayers. It's the biggest fraud ever!

You jackoffs want to be rude to me when I went out of my way to be nice. What has the physics community accomplished since the GPS system, that has actually helped make people's lives better?
 
Did you ever find evidence for banging branes? No. Did you ever find evidence for the Many World Interpretation? No. Did you ever figure out what reality is? No. Did you ever figure out how chemistry causes consciousness? No. Did you ever figure out why the physics constants are fine tuned for complex chemistry? No. Did you ever figure out what causes the physics constants to exist at all? No.
 
POVphysics2 said:
Did you ever find evidence for banging branes? No. Did you ever find evidence for the Many World Interpretation? No. Did you ever figure out what reality is? No. Did you ever figure out how chemistry causes consciousness? No. Did you ever figure out why the physics constants are fine tuned for complex chemistry? No. Did you ever figure out what causes the physics constants to exist at all? No.
Click to expand...

Only thing missing in this lot, as Billy Connolly asked, does anyone know how did the diced carrots get there? No

:)
 
Mod Note

POVphysics2 said:
I'm still suspended! I can't see it, dumbass!
Click to expand...
POVphysics2 said:
While we're at it, can you explain why we care so much about the entropy of black holes? I mean, is this going to lead to a major breakthrough in technology some day? Like, are you going to invent the entropy drive or something? o_O
Click to expand...
POVphysics2 said:
Can you explain to be how tiny little superstrings form together to create spacetime? I mean, my spaggetti doesn't act that way. Or, why is it that the arrow of time is in the direction of increasing entropy (which makes sense). So the big bang should be the point of minimum entropy. So, how does superstring spagetti get us to a minimum entropy?
Click to expand...
POVphysics2 said:
Why does Quantum Loop gravity sound like chain mail? And how did it get there? And how is it compatible with big bang cosmology? Like I said, all the leading theories are garbage!
Click to expand...
POVphysics2 said:
And have you physicists, you amazingly brilliant geniuses figured out how you're going to prove that you can recover the "information content" of objects dropped into a black hole after it evaporates after 10^10^10^42 years? I mean, the load of total bullshit is amazing! The kind of crap that physicists waste their careers on and get paid by college students and taxpayers. It's the biggest fraud ever!

You jackoffs want to be rude to me when I went out of my way to be nice. What has the physics community accomplished since the GPS system, that has actually helped make people's lives better?
Click to expand...
POVphysics2 said:
Did you ever find evidence for banging branes? No. Did you ever find evidence for the Many World Interpretation? No. Did you ever figure out what reality is? No. Did you ever figure out how chemistry causes consciousness? No. Did you ever figure out why the physics constants are fine tuned for complex chemistry? No. Did you ever figure out what causes the physics constants to exist at all? No.
Click to expand...
You seriously need a hobby!

You are flaming for a response. You have been infecting threads with this kind of rubbish since you arrived on this site.

It is neither nice or acceptable.

Please refer to this site's rules. Pay particular attention to E4:

E4. Refrain from posting several consecutive posts in a row as this disturbs the readable flow of a thread. If nobody has replied to your first post, edit it instead of posting another post.​

And then while you're at it, look at the part on flaming and trolling.
 
POVphysics2 said:
Remember when we figured out that light is made of quanta of photons? It was the Ultraviolet Catastrophe that gave us the heads up that something was wrong. Well, we're going to figure out that spacetime geometry is made of quanta too.
Click to expand...
And that is controversial?
Ever heard of CDT (Causal Dynamical triangulation)?

Causal Dynamical Triangulation
Causal dynamical triangulation (abbreviated as CDT) theorized by Renate Loll, Jan Ambjørn and Jerzy Jurkiewicz, and popularized by Fotini Markopoulou and Lee Smolin, is an approach to quantum gravity that like loop quantum gravity is background independent.
Click to expand...
This means that it does not assume any pre-existing arena (dimensional space), but rather attempts to show how the spacetime fabric itself evolves.
Click to expand...
There is evidence [1] that at large scales CDT approximates the familiar 4-dimensional spacetime, but shows spacetime to be 2-dimensional near the Planck scale, and reveals a fractal structure on slices of constant time. These interesting results agree with the findings of Lauscher and Reuter, who use an approach called Quantum Einstein Gravity, and with other recent theoretical work.
Click to expand...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_dynamical_triangulation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top