Are you not missing something like "Something something microtubules"? Or is this particular wheel reduced to just this thread?Indeed it is.
Are you not missing something like "Something something microtubules"? Or is this particular wheel reduced to just this thread?Indeed it is.
THis is true. I don't tink anyone diagrees with this - except Write4U.The truth about mathematics is that mathematics , in and of its self , can not produce nor create space , nor a physical three dimensional thing . Hence can not create this Universe or Universes .
How does that follow?Hence space and the physical is the essence of mathematics .
Thinkers do not include themselves in their mathematics.But they do . The thinker is physical .
By changing your "anthropomorphic conceptualization" to "RW function"How could a concept possibly control a physical system?
Apparently you missed this worldwide attention in science and media.The carnivorous Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) can count to five: A team led by biophysicist Rainer Hedrich, professor at Julius-Maximilians-Universität (JMU) Würzburg in Bavaria, Germany, proved this in 2016. This finding received worldwide attention in science and the media.
In 2019, the JMU plant scientist was awarded the Koselleck Research Prize of the German Research Foundation (DFG) worth 1.5 million euros – and with it the opportunity to find out how the carnivorous plant counts. This is now shown by a Japanese research team, led by the developmental biologist Professor Mitsuyasu Hasebe from the University of Okazaki, and Rainer Hedrich's team in the journal Nature Plants.
If a prey touches one of the sensory hairs on the inner trap side of Dionaea, the mechanical stimulus is converted into an electrical signal. This so-called action potential spreads over the entire trap. As a reaction to this, nothing happens at first. But when within 30 seconds a second action potential electrically excites the trap, it snaps shut. If, on the other hand, the second stimulus takes longer, the first action potential is erased from the short-term memory of the Venus flytrap.
And how would you rebut this argument that the Venus Flytrap can count a number via exceeding a biochemical threshold value, but not "know" it?James R said: Also, why are you backpeddling now? Previously, you said maths can't cause things, but here you're back to asserting that maths "controls" a physical system, which implies that it causes the system to behave one way rather than another. That would be causation.
Apparently. Do you keep up with every item of news?Apparently you missed this worldwide attention in science and media.
No. Counting has very little to do with memory.Short term cellular memory even. Does that translate in being able to count time of duration?
The flytrap doesn't have a brain. How could it possibly "know" anything, in the way that we humans use the word "know" to describe a thinking process?And how would you rebut this argument that the Venus Flytrap can count a number via exceeding a biochemical threshold value, but not "know" it?
An autonomic response, mediated by chemical and electrical signals. No brain involved.That is very similar to how "quorum sensing" is a primitive form of counting without knowing the value of numbers, but reacting to the threshold value of a density ratio.
What arguments?As long as you keep misinterpreting my arguments (supported by bona fide scientific narratives), how can I backpeddle?
Not deliberately misrepresenting them does not imply that you are accurately representing them, or that they show what you think they show.I never hear you say that I am deliberately misrepresenting the quoted materials. That would lying.
Your sources are usually irrelevant to whatever it is that I am trying to discuss with you. You quote sources as if they support your views, but they rarely have any relevance to your claims, let along support them.Nor do I hear you say that my sources are liars.
Who is "them"?But you just like to accuse them of commercialism.
No. You get induction periods in chemical kinetics too. Nothing is doing any "counting".Short term cellular memory even. Does that translate in being able to count time of duration?
Yet they should . That would help them understand that not anything is possible .Thinkers do not include themselves in their mathematics.
There are whole disciplines of mathemtics that explore n-dimensional matrices - 4D, 5D, 10D, 100D, etc. that have no counterpart in the physical world.
Do you feel you are in a position to be telling mathematicians what they should be researching?Yet they should . That would help them understand that not anything is possible .
I'm saying that some things are not possible . While it maybe fun . All these dimensions are not possible .Do you feel you are in a position to be telling mathematicians what they should be researching?
What do you know about mathematics?I'm saying that some things are not possible . While it maybe fun . All these dimensions are not possible .
Exactly. As previously stated, some aspects of mathematics have no counterpart in the physical world. You seemed to think all mathematics was necessarily built on the physical world. It's not.I'm saying that some things are not possible . While it maybe fun . All these dimensions are not possible .
I already knew this .Exactly. As previously stated, some aspects of mathematics have no counterpart in the physical world. You seemed to think all mathematics was necessarily built on the physical world. It's not.
Reported for being a brainless profoundly stupid troll.I already knew this .
The bending of space . Space can only be bend with mathematics . In reality space can not bend .
How does space bend ? What is the process ? What process actually bends space physically ?Reported for being a brainless profoundly stupid troll.
Fuck off. Idiot. Reported and blocked.How does space bend ? What is the process ? What process actually bends space physically ?
How does space bend ? What is the process ? What process actually bends space physically ?Fuck off. Idiot. Reported and blocked.
No it does not. Natural selection is the most subtle of mathematical function. It is a passive pattern forming that depends onFollowing every branch of a maze is not "solving" it. Or, rather, it "solves" it by brute force trial and error.
Now you are anthropomorhizing again. It doesnot need to know. All it needs to react to the "been here" sign that was deposited the frst time the slime mold passed this dead end. It simply avoids this route because the slime molds recognizes its own sign and reacts to its message.James R:
This retraction of the slime branches is what you're describing as the slime mold doing subtraction, is it? You think the slime mold is thinking about maths as it retracts its branches?
Is it possible to know where you've been when you don't have a brain? Depending on your definition of "know," the answer may be yes. Researchers have shown that the slime mold, an organism without anything that resembles a nervous system (or, for that matter, individual cells), is capable of impressive feats of navigation. It can even link food sources in optimally spaced networks. Now, researchers have shown it's capable of filling its environment with indications of where it has already searched for food, allowing it to "remember" its past efforts and focus its attention on routes it hasn't explored. https://arstechnica.com/science/201...ain-creates-external-memories-for-navigation/
It's called subtraction.Where's the maths?
James R:
How could a brainless organism understand maths?
It doesn't need to understand it. All it needs is "stimulation and"reaction", also known as "detection and a comparative" form of cognition"Non-conscious mathematical abilities refer to how sets of objects acquire self-organizing mathematical properties, such as the brain's innate ability to process numbers and solve equations without conscious awareness12345. These abilities can occur before individuals are aware of the words and numbers in front of their eyes3.
But nobody says that detection needs to be a conscious act. All it needs is a specific reaction based on the physical type and mathematical value of the stimulant.
In mathematical terms, density is mass divided by volume.James R:
Using the wikipedia definition you quoted, yes it is.
Yes, it is! Here is your map.A strange way of putting it, but okay. It is a ratio.
But now you claim that it's not really a mathematical object, right? It's just a generality. Do you see your hypocrisy in this denial?
Just as we can assign physical properties to mathematical objects or systems. Where exactly does physics begin?James R:
We humans can certainly assign mathematical properties to physical objects or systems.
A wave function is a mathematical description of the propagating disturbance2. It is a solution to some partial differential equation involving spatial and time derivatives2. In quantum mechanics, the wavefunction is used to determine the probabilities that quantum systems are in certain states3. However, it is not a physical wave in the traditional sense4.
W4U:
Bonnie Bassler
Yes, they communicate via a mathematical term "quorum sensing", a system that counts for a treshold quantity, a "quorum".James R:
I have no idea who that is. Never heard of her. But I doubt you will post anything useful that she has to say about the necessary truth of mathematics.
A quorum is not a physical object. It is a numerical (countable) object.
Yes, countable numbers that trigger a simultaneous action potential that is physically "causal" to the procuction of action potentials, such as virulence.James R:
So you're saying that bacteria don't communicate using maths; they communicate using chemicals.
Which I see as a mathematical processing of variable mathematical values in accordance with logical principles which are invariable in and of themselves (Fibonacci Sequence)
Write4U said:
It is the mathematics of growth numbers that controls virulence. The threshold trigger is a mathematical function, based on ratio of autoinducers released among a growing bacterial population, triggeringvirulenc.
Exchemist:
Wrong, and wrong.
Write4U said:
It is the ratio, the mathematical differential equation, that determines a threshold action. Just like political voting requires a "quorum" . That is not by density. That is by count and results in simultaneous action.
Yes,James R:
No.
View attachment 6680Also, why are you backpeddling now? Previously, you said maths can't cause things, but here you're back to asserting that maths "controls" a physical system, which implies that it causes the system to behave one way rather than another. That would be causation.