Ether model

[Michael Anteski]

What of neutrons though ? Where do they come from .

In my Ether Model, an ether-world preceded our quantum-atomic world. The preceding ether world contained partly-quantized "islands," where creation of a quantum world could be done from. In the model, quantum electrons were creationally projected through the ether, which resulted in a self-sustained chain-reaction, and produced the quantized world we are in now.

In my creation model, protons are readily accounted for, because the negatively charged electrons would have been balanced out, charge-wise, by positively charged protons.

Neutrons are part of the theories of quantum physics, and my area is ether-theory. Physicists measure the behavior of neutrons, which they have found to be unstable units which spontaneously decay, except when they are inside an atom. Inside the atom, neutrons stay stable because if they were to decay as they do outside the atoms, they would generate a proton and electron (plus an antineutron), and the electrical stability of the atom requires the neutron to stay a neutron, and not to decay. (This is standard quantum physics, not my field, so I'll leave it at that, you can look it up in more detail if you wish.)

 

[river]

In my Ether Model, an ether-world preceded our quantum-atomic world. The preceding ether world contained partly-quantized "islands," where creation of a quantum world could be done from. In the model, quantum electrons were creationally projected through the ether, which resulted in a self-sustained chain-reaction, and produced the quantized world we are in now.

In my creation model, protons are readily accounted for, because the negatively charged electrons would have been balanced out, charge-wise, by positively charged protons.

Neutrons are part of the theories of quantum physics, and my area is ether-theory. Physicists measure the behavior of neutrons, which they have found to be unstable units which spontaneously decay, except when they are inside an atom. Inside the atom, neutrons stay stable because if they were to decay as they do outside the atoms, they would generate a proton and electron (plus an antineutron), and the electrical stability of the atom requires the neutron to stay a neutron, and not to decay. (This is standard quantum physics, not my field, so I'll leave it at that, you can look it up in more detail if you wish.)

You need neutrons to stabilise an atom with more than one proton .

 

[Michael 345]

In my Ether Model,

Does this Ether Model make any predictions? and any mathematical equations associated with your Ether Model?

As I am requesting of George who, in about thread, is claiming to have Scientific Proof Of god (SPOG)

I am asking Show me your workings. Even if I cannot understand I am sure some in SciForum can follow

 

[Michael Anteski]

Does this Ether Model make any predictions? and any mathematical equations associated with your Ether Model?

As I am requesting of George who, in about thread, is claiming to have Scientific Proof Of god (SPOG)

I am asking Show me your workings. Even if I cannot understand I am sure some in SciForum can follow

If you look back in this lengthy Thread, it mentions that my Ether Model has been obtained using codebreaking of secret sets of codes putatively enciphered by otherworldly sources, which describes these ether forces. The force-units are very tiny and our technologies don't detect it, so you can't apply mathematics to it (at least not as yet.)

Making predictions would involve human freedom of choice, so I haven't done that with this codebreaking methodology.

 

[Michael 345]

If you look back in this lengthy Thread

I didn't

it mentions that my Ether Model has been obtained

I will take your word on that point

has been obtained using codebreaking

I see (really don't but hope to)

of secret sets of codes putatively enciphered by otherworldly sources, (the bastards) which describes these ether forces

Truely fascinating, continue. And again I see but really don't but hope to. Moving on with your narrative

The force-units are very tiny and our technologies don't detect it

Truely truely outstanding The force-units are very tiny and our technologies don't detect it but dispite being undetected know of their (the tiny forces) presence

Gets more increasingly incredible

so you can't apply mathematics to it (at least not as yet.)

Of course you can't apply mathematics to it. That would be silly

Making predictions would involve human freedom of choice, so I haven't done that with this codebreaking methodology.

I don't quite make the link. Maybe a bit of mulling will help. Or mull (to heat, sweeten, and flavor (a beverage, such as wine or cider) with spices)

I'm mulling a leaf of mint plus ½ teaspoon of sugar per 10 litres of alcoholic version of cider

A dose of the above Ev evaree everrree think thingk everry thunk wood be klear

Gooodknight everry one incluuuding Gracy

I NEED COFFEE

 

[DaveC426913]

...secret sets of codes putatively enciphered by otherworldly sources...

I think I've asked this question before and I think you dodged it before.

Why can we not see these sets of codes for ourselves? Isn't science meant to be transparent and collaborative?

 

[Michael Anteski]

I think I've asked this question before and I think you dodged it before.

Why can we not see these sets of codes for ourselves? Isn't science meant to be transparent and collaborative?

That would be shown only to someone who would underwrite the costs of a field test designed to demonstrate the ether (the test procedure also having come from the same code sources.)

 

[Michael 345]

That would be shown only to someone who would underwrite the costs of a field test designed to demonstrate the ether (the test procedure also having come from the same code sources.)

I wyll neuer bye the pyg in the poke
Thers many a foule pyg in a feyre cloke

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_in_a_poke

 

[river]

That would be shown only to someone who would underwrite the costs of a field test designed to demonstrate the ether (the test procedure also having come from the same code sources.)

What would the costs be ?

Details , distribution of costs .

 

[Michael 345]

That would be shown only to someone who would underwrite the costs of a field test designed to demonstrate the ether (the test procedure also having come from the same code sources.)

Any estimate cost of this field test?

How was the estimate determined?

Would this estimate be disclosed to the possible someone who showed interest?

 

[river]

Any estimate cost of this field test?

How was the estimate determined?

Would this estimate be disclosed to the possible someone who showed interest?

Of course , at least I would think so , I would . Tell the truth .

 

[origin]

Apparently Michael saw the Nicholas Cage movie National Treasure and developed some sort of delusions about it. It is just a bunch of craziness...

The historical Doc is the Declaration of Independence. (A claim that it contains cosmic scientific information of course would imply that T. Jefferson wasn't the true author of the Document.) -I did decode it, and derive scientific information, and I am pretty sure no one else has done that, but that wouldn't mean anybody is "smarter." -I spent a lot of time over a period of years studying scientific enigmas, which put me in an open-minded position to interpret coded kind of "alternative" information. -To get into this kind of cryptography, you'd need to study alphabet-substitution tables such as those of Vigenere and Porta, which were known in Jefferson's time. You'd then have to figure out how to arrange the text with the correct number of letters to each line, in "blocks" of lines, and intuit correct "key" word(s) in order to set up a cipher text properly, (I mostly used Vigenere's method) which you would juxtapose with the plain text (the Declaration itself.) Then you would be ready to derive decoded messages, which appear, many of them in tic-tac-toe fashion. -This may sound fallible, compared to mathematical, more-objectifiable, modern codes, but my belief is that the encoded messages were purposely done this way, and used special "ether" computers. -I have yet to derive any messages that were internally inconsistent (inconsistent with the rest of the messages) even after deriving a few thousand message-lines.

 

[Michael Anteski]

Alright, my Ether Model was derived from the codebreaking work, and I have not given details of a field test to detect ether, but doesn't anyone want to dialogue about how this Ether Model, linked to its model of creational design, compares against the other currently-accepted models of our world, based on ideas like a Big Bang and other random-chance cosmic processes?

 

[Michael 345]

Alright, my Ether Model was derived from the codebreaking work, and I have not given details of a field test to detect ether, but doesn't anyone want to dialogue about how this Ether Model, linked to its model of creational design, compares against the other currently-accepted models of our world, based on ideas like a Big Bang and other random-chance cosmic processes?

Short answer - looks like NO

Long answer - still looking like a NO

 

[river]

Alright, my Ether Model was derived from the codebreaking work, and I have not given details of a field test to detect ether, but doesn't anyone want to dialogue about how this Ether Model, linked to its model of creational design, compares against the other currently-accepted models of our world, based on ideas like a Big Bang and other random-chance cosmic processes?

Sure . Continue . Creational design , defined as ? . Ether model based on life .

river

 

[Michael Anteski]

Short answer - looks like NO

Long answer - still looking like a NO

Michael 345,

As one aspect of comparing my ether model with currently-accepted-by-physics models, consider how the two different models view the basic question of how the world formed. -The accepted view of quantum physicists is that stars and planets were "formed by swirling gases,"and then "atoms appeared." -Compare how vague that model is with the detailed stepwise explanation of my ether/designed-creation model, as described a few posts back.

 

[DaveC426913]

The accepted view of quantum physicists is that stars and planets were "formed by swirling gases,"and then "atoms appeared."

...how vague that model is ...

OK, so you have not read up on the current model.

Can't think outside the box if you don't know what's in it or where it is.

the detailed stepwise explanation of my ether/designed-creation model

Yes, everybody knows if it's detailed and stepwise, it has to be true.
(I have a detailed stepwise explanation of how to make magic pixie dust. The pixies told me how. All I need is someone to front the money for the materials.)

 

[Michael 345]

The accepted view of quantum physicists is that stars and planets were "formed by swirling gases,"

Ummm? Not sure about quantum physicists - I'll go with physics though

Continue

and then "atoms appeared."

Double Ummm?

Are not gases made of atoms?

Sneaks a look at Periodic Table and encyclopaedia Britannica

https://www.britannica.com/science/hydrogen

hydrogen
chemical element
Alternate titles: H

By William Lee Jolly

hydrogen (H), a colourless, odourless, tasteless, flammable gaseous substance that is the simplest member of the family of chemical elements. The hydrogen atom has a nucleus consisting of a proton bearing one unit of positive electrical charge; an electron, bearing one unit of negative electrical charge, is also associated with this nucleus.

detailed stepwise explanation

Since I have not read your detailed stepwise explanation I decline any comment on details

As a WHOLE however .....

Na will let you figure out ....

Good luck

Mumble font [CLICK] ON

view the basic question ....... how the world formed ...... view of quantum physicists ......... stars and planets were "formed by swirling gases,"....... then (sound of forehead being slapped) "atoms appeared ghjytffgghjffsxcbbbjjkkkh mumble fades away

Mumble font [CLICK] OFF

 

[Michael 345]

I have a detailed stepwise explanation of how to make magic pixie dust. The pixies told me how. All I need is someone to front the money for the materials.

Which is ground up Leprechaun gold found at the end of Rainbows

Go and collect some for free

 

[origin]

-The accepted view of quantum physicists is that stars and planets were "formed by swirling gases,"and then "atoms appeared."

Nobody thinks that, well no rational person thinks that.