UFO; Friend or Foe?

UFO; Friend or Foe?

  • Friend

    Votes: 1 50.0%

  • Foe

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • Total voters
    2
Q-reeus said:
the Navy continues to classify the UAPs encountered as real but unknown.
Click to expand...
Because they are real but unknown. They are unexplained UFO's.
Q-reeus said:
And why not one of the aircrew or shipborne or AWACS radar operators involved in those multiple encounters think there is a mundane explanation.
Click to expand...
Is this what they all said? Are they scientists? Are they familiar with all sorts of atmospheric disturbances, and phenomena?

Again, as I have said many times, there is absolutely no sense, rhyme nor reason, as to why Aliens continue to flitter in and flitter out again, with making some official contact, or landing on the Sydney Opera House forecourt, or Westminster, or the White House lawns. This isn't a case or a comparison of us to ants on an ant hill. To any advanced civilisation, it would be obvious that we are "somewhat" intelligent...afterall, we have mastered heavier then air flight, and NEO, and trips to the Moon.

And again while I firmly and positively believe we are not alone, as yet we do not have the required evidence to support any thought of life off this fart arse little blue orb.
Oh, yes, and I have seen my own UFO, and that's what it remains, a UFO, unidentified.
 
river said:
OH Please . Non-sense thinking .
Click to expand...
And claiming that Aliens have conducted a atomic war on Mars is not nonsense? Or claiming that the Moon does not rotate is not also nonsense? Or that water is poisonous is not nonsense?
Would it be fair then for me to remark that your comment on others spouting nonsense is a case of the Pot calling the Kettle black? You do understand what that means river?
 
paddoboy said:
And claiming that Aliens have conducted a atomic war on Mars is not nonsense? Or claiming that the Moon does not rotate is not also nonsense? Or that water is poisonous is not nonsense?
Would it be fair then for me to remark that your comment on others spouting nonsense is a case of the Pot calling the Kettle black? You do understand what that means river?
Click to expand...

Prove that it is not nonsense .

I retracted that mistake pad . You are acting more like a politician than one of science .

Water is poisonous ? If it is polluted with dangerous chemicals .
 
river said:
Prove that it is not nonsense .
Click to expand...
You prove that what was said is nonsense...afterall you made the first claim in post 98.
river said:
I retracted that mistake pad . You are acting more like a politician than one of science .
Click to expand...
It wasn't a mistake. It was an example of your totally illogical reasoning and anti mainstream science stance. To even contemplate such nonsense is crazy.
river said:
Water is poisonous ? If it is polluted with dangerous chemicals .
Click to expand...
Stop being so dishonestly obtuse river...No one drinks water that is polluted. Water is not poisonous...you were wrong again in claiming it is.
 
paddoboy said:
You prove that what was said is nonsense...afterall you made the first claim in post 98.

It wasn't a mistake. It was an example of your totally illogical reasoning and anti mainstream science stance. To even contemplate such nonsense is crazy.

Stop being so dishonestly obtuse river...No one drinks water that is polluted. Water is not poisonous...you were wrong again in claiming it is.
Click to expand...

True Gibberish .
 
billvon said:
Remember the Tunguska Blast? That was claimed to be aliens for a long time. Turns out it was just a meteor. The fact that they couldn't explain it for decades did not mean it was aliens.
Click to expand...
Not a single occurrence of the word alien in the lengthy Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event
From the beginning it was thought to be either a comet or asteroid/meteoroid air burst event. Wild speculation of exploding alien spacecraft e.g.
https://www.ufoinsight.com/conspiracy/historical/the-tunguska-incident
bears zero relevance to the naval multiple UAP encounters of 2004 and 2014-2015, the latter happening on a daily basis according to fighter pilots involved. 'cubes inside of spheres' buzzing the super hornets in near collisions. Oh yeah, that sounds so ordinary. Not.
Ever hear about the six alien spacecraft found in England in 1967? The government investigated; even took one to the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston to be studied. They were a college hoax.
Click to expand...
And how long did that stunt fool the authorities? A day at most? Again, no comparison at all to the 2004, 2014-2015 naval multiple encounters that after careful scrutiny remain xlassified as unexplained by navy and Pentagon spokespersons. Synchronized state-of-the-art radar and FLIR and trained observers visual confirmations of objects having completely inappropriate aerodynamic design undergoing at times hypersonic motions without any associated sonic booms. Similarly with the 2004 tic tac encounters. So very mundane. Not.
Imagine you were a pathologist and regularly did autopsies. You do thousands over the years. Then a new cadaver comes in for an autopsy. What's more likely? That you will do that autopsy and find the usual viscera, along with perhaps a pathology - or that it is full of extraterrestrial creatures masquerading in a human suit?
Click to expand...
I enjoyed watching those MIB movies too. So?
 
paddoboy said:
Because they are real but unknown. They are unexplained UFO's.

Is this what they all said? Are they scientists? Are they familiar with all sorts of atmospheric disturbances, and phenomena?

Again, as I have said many times, there is absolutely no sense, rhyme nor reason, as to why Aliens continue to flitter in and flitter out again, with making some official contact, or landing on the Sydney Opera House forecourt, or Westminster, or the White House lawns. This isn't a case or a comparison of us to ants on an ant hill. To any advanced civilisation, it would be obvious that we are "somewhat" intelligent...afterall, we have mastered heavier then air flight, and NEO, and trips to the Moon.

And again while I firmly and positively believe we are not alone, as yet we do not have the required evidence to support any thought of life off this fart arse little blue orb.
Oh, yes, and I have seen my own UFO, and that's what it remains, a UFO, unidentified.
Click to expand...
You keep thinking these 'flitter in and flitter out' UAP encounters are to be treated as supposed nuts and bolts spacecraft piloted by flesh and blood humanoid aliens. How many times have I explained that is far from my conception of what is going on? In one ear, out the other. Sigh.
 
Q-reeus said:
You keep thinking these 'flitter in and flitter out' UAP encounters are to be treated as supposed nuts and bolts spacecraft piloted by flesh and blood humanoid aliens. How many times have I explained that is far from my conception of what is going on? In one ear, out the other. Sigh.
Click to expand...
My point is that they are simply unexplained...not anything in particular, and far less likely to be Alien controlled or Alien robotically controlled.
If I have missed something my apologies, blame MR and/or river, with the total overall nonsense claimed by this pair over many posts.
 
paddoboy said:
Well your gullibility at least is the problem. We tell little children about Santa Claus and the Easter bunny, to add awe and wonder to their lives...in time most grow out of that and understand that they are just fairy tales.
The thing is that most cosmologists accept the fact that extra terrestrial life should exist somewhere...the near infinite extent and content of the universe, along with the stuff of life being everywhere we look, supports that belief.
But at the same time, those same scientists know and understand that at this time, we do not have any convincing evidence for any such life.
The gullible, [like river and MR] automatically assume that any unexplained UFO is of Alien origin. Facts are, its just unidentified.
Click to expand...

After having watched the last Episode of 'Dakota's Destination Fear' yesterday on Television. (A real life documentary Ghost Show.) I have been assured that I'm not gullible. They mentioned they were filming in an American State known for UFO activity, bobbing in an'out the Sea.
 
HawkI said:
After having watched the last Episode of 'Dakota's Destination Fear' yesterday on Television. (A real life documentary Ghost Show.) I have been assured that I'm not gullible.
Click to expand...
I think you meant to post this in the humor section.
 
origin said:
I think you meant to post this in the humor section.
Click to expand...
When Albert Einstien had the chance to be the first to publish the expansion of the Universe is accelerating, but bottled out of doing so, he felt really silly when someone published it after him.

I wonder how silly you will feel when the Para-Normal (UFOs proved to be true etc) becomes Normal?

Edit:-
Behaviour that may get you banned
  • Personal attacks on another member, including name-calling.
I think we're ok here because Origin underestimates my sincerity on my not feeling Gullible comment.
 
Last edited:
HawkI said:
I wonder how silly you will feel when the Para-Normal (UFOs proved to be true etc) becomes Normal?
Click to expand...
That has happened hundreds of times. A sighting that someone is 100% convinced is a UFO turns out to be a normal aircraft.
 
HawkI said:
When Albert Einstien had the chance to be the first to publish the expansion of the Universe is accelerating, but bottled out of doing so, he felt really silly when someone published it after him.
Click to expand...
He didn't feel silly, since he had been dead for over 40 years before the discovery of the acceleration!
HawkI said:
Edit:-
Behaviour that may get you banned
  • Personal attacks on another member, including name-calling.
Click to expand...
I didn't call you a name, however you certainly are extremely gullible to think a silly tv program is true.
HawkI said:
I think we're ok here because Origin underestimates my sincerity on my not feeling Gullible comment.
Click to expand...
I think you are sincere, which is rather sad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top