What Is Love? Does Lust Have To Be Apart Of Love?

Can You Have An Everlasting Marriage Without Sex?

  • Total voters
    4
youreyes said:
He is jealous of your "romantic" discussion escapade with BrianHarwarespecialist.
Click to expand...
What The Heck.
How Is This Not Science? Love Is Neurological, Biological, Metaphiysical, Philisophical. All Based Around Science In Every Form.
Now Because Sacred Geometry, And Enlightenment Have Been Thrown In The Mix CAN Be Confusing To Others.
But THAT TOO IS SCIENCE.
Quantum Science.
 
ALSO, To Get This Straight The Coversation I Was Having Wasnt At All "romantic" Unless You Decode It In Ideological Conversation For Growth And Wisdom. Lol.
Now Im Not Understand The Hatred For Our Conversation? What IS The Reason Behind It?
 
youreyes said:
To OP, if you want a romantic answer and an idealist one, yes you can have love without sex. If you want the truth and biological strength behind that truth, no you cant have love without sex. Buuuuuuuuut, you can have love after sex.
Click to expand...
And Thank You Youreyes!!!
 
I Do Understand. Exchemist Has It Out For brainharwareexpert Aha.
He Is Simply Throwing Chaos Around To Keep Others "barking" Back For His Own Enjoyment.
Must Be A Lonely Life To Be Throwing Chaos In Others Intellectual Conversations For No Reason But Self Gain.
 
Alyssa DeMello said:
I Do Understand. Exchemist Has It Out For brainharwareexpert Aha.
He Is Simply Throwing Chaos Around To Keep Others "barking" Back For His Own Enjoyment.
Must Be A Lonely Life To Be Throwing Chaos In Others Intellectual Conversations For No Reason But Self Gain.
Click to expand...
Not so lonely as all that. If you look at the other threads you will see some contributions of mine to a discussion about the Uncertainty Principle and about fog and cloud formation, for example. Those are science discussions. But I also occasionally have some fun at the expense of various perennial nutters we have here, so it is not all serious....

But enough about me. Actually I'm intrigued to know your nationality. Your extraordinary use of capital letters suggests you are not a native English speaker.
 
22 Yr Old Have A Convo.
And I Was Born And Raised In The U.s.
Ive Typed Like This Since I Was 15.
You Would Be Surprised, I Know 4 Others That Type Like Me.
 
exchemist said:
Not so lonely as all that. If you look at the other threads you will see some contributions of mine to a discussion about the Uncertainty Principle and about fog and cloud formation, for example. Those are science discussions. But I also occasionally have some fun at the expense of various perennial nutters we have here, so it is not all serious....

But enough about me. Actually I'm intrigued to know your nationality. Your extraordinary use of capital letters suggests you are not a native English speaker.
Click to expand...
And No It Wasnt All Serious, BUT I Did Gain Much Insight, And Have Many More Questions Now.
And I Apologize, But Why Just Because The WHOLE Conversation Wasnt Stone Science, There Is An Issue To Have To Be Reported And Frowned Upon?
Like I Said Ive Gained Insight And Extra Questions That I Would Not Have Had If The Conversation Hadnt Taken Place. Therefore It Motivated Me For More Research.
 
Alyssa DeMello said:
And No It Wasnt All Serious, BUT I Did Gain Much Insight, And Have Many More Questions Now.
And I Apologize, But Why Just Because The WHOLE Conversation Wasnt Stone Science, There Is An Issue To Have To Be Reported And Frowned Upon?
Like I Said Ive Gained Insight And Extra Questions That I Would Not Have Had If The Conversation Hadnt Taken Place. Therefore It Motivated Me For More Research.
Click to expand...
For me the main issue is keeping the hard science sections of the forum for proper scientific questions and discussions. There are other sections where speculations and ideas that are not scientific can be pursued. It is up to the Moderators to decide such matters, but they at least partly rely on reports from readers to help them apply the rules, as they can't read everything that everyone posts.

Your claim that "enlightenment" or rather "Enlightenment" is "quantum science" is symptomatic. Perhaps you are are confusing "enlightenment" with "entanglement" or something. But neither seems to make a lot of sense, scientifically speaking. So I think your discussion is better off in a different part of the forum. But no doubt well see what the mods think.
 
Doesn't It Take A Lot More Effort To Type If You Capitalise Every Word?

Why would you do that? Do you think it's a cute idiosyncrasy?
 
exchemist said:
For me the main issue is keeping the hard science sections of the forum for proper scientific questions and discussions. There are other sections where speculations and ideas that are not scientific can be pursued. It is up to the Moderators to decide such matters, but they at least partly rely on reports from readers to help them apply the rules, as they can't read everything that everyone posts.

Your claim that "enlightenment" or rather "Enlightenment" is "quantum science" is symptomatic. Perhaps you are are confusing "enlightenment" with "entanglement" or something. But neither seems to make a lot of sense, scientifically speaking. So I think your discussion is better off in a different part of the forum. But no doubt well see what the mods think.
Click to expand...
When I Speak Of Enlightenment I Am Refering Not Just By Spirit, But What Ties With It. I.
James R said:
Doesn't It Take A Lot More Effort To Type If You Capitalise Every Word?

Why would you do that? Do you think it's a cute idiosyncrasy?
Click to expand...

Honestly After Became A Habit, I Dont Think Twice About It. It Takes More Effort Now To Type Normally..
And Yes Actually. When I Was 15 It Was A Statement Of Me, And It Actually Is More Attractive To My Eyes.
Although Is Frusturating For Most People. Lol.
The Way I Type I Still Feel It Expresses My Personality Somehome. Just Fun, And Different. Unique.
 
Alyssa DeMello said:
With Humans Being Humans, More Is Better. At Least That Is The Concept Of Our World Now.
So Why Would I Be Everything For One Person, When That Person Could Have More...Its Hard To Wrap My Head Around The Idea And True Sense Of Love..
Lust, Lust Would Be The Biggest Grabber In Human Minds. Its Easy, And Addicting, With That You Can Modify Within Compounds Of "more"
Yes, Lust Is Part Of Love, But Could There Really Be Love Without The Over Controling Urge Of Lust? Our Existence Is Solely Based On Re Creating, Lust.
But The Idea Of Love Is Different... So Really The Question Is. What Exactly IS Love.
Cause If There Wasn't Sex, And Those Chemicals Weren't Being Fired In The Brain, Then Love Honestly Wouldn't Exist..
So For There To Be Love, With A Single Person.
That Person Would Truly Have To Satisfy By Sex And Our Primal Base Of Recreating.
But Humans Cant Eat The Same Piece Of Cake, Right? We Get Bored, And Want A Different Flavor..
Its A Dark Truth That Im Just Now Thinking About. But This Is Not At All Scientific, Well Partially, But More Of Just Thoughts.
Click to expand...


Honestly, in my own opinion, Love is different from lust and it is not actually a part of love. When you love , you simply don't focus about sex. If you only think of it for another person then it is not love but definitely a lust. Love is different from lust in a sense that Love is an emotion that accepts the other person completely even without sex. On the other hand, lust is purely a very strong sexual desire for someone without the feelings called love.
 
SereneCalm said:
Honestly, in my own opinion, Love is different from lust and it is not actually a part of love. When you love , you simply don't focus about sex. If you only think of it for another person then it is not love but definitely a lust. Love is different from lust in a sense that Love is an emotion that accepts the other person completely even without sex. On the other hand, lust is purely a very strong sexual desire for someone without the feelings called love.
Click to expand...
I Do Feel So Also.
Just Scientifically Before There Is Love There Is Lust.
 
Alyssa DeMello said:
When I Speak Of Enlightenment I Am Refering Not Just By Spirit, But What Ties With It. I.


Honestly After Became A Habit, I Dont Think Twice About It. It Takes More Effort Now To Type Normally..
And Yes Actually. When I Was 15 It Was A Statement Of Me, And It Actually Is More Attractive To My Eyes.
Although Is Frusturating For Most People. Lol.
The Way I Type I Still Feel It Expresses My Personality Somehome. Just Fun, And Different. Unique.
Click to expand...
You mean sorta like a solipsistic pain in the arse? :D
 
Alyssa DeMello said:
The Way I Type I Still Feel It Expresses My Personality Somehome. Just Fun, And Different. Unique.
Click to expand...
So, basically you are saying "My readers can go fuck themselves. I will make no effort to make things straightforward for them. They should be honoured that they have the opportunity to read my insightful words."

I look forward to reading one of your posts when you grow up. Drop me a line in a decade or so, when you get there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top