No, she didn't. What she said was that nobody was going to go to extraordinary lengths to advocate leniency for you any longer... to which you replied that "you don't take anything she says seriously" (of interesting note, you have said that to several moderators AND one of our administrators).
This kind of shit, right here, is why you are issued with infraction points, which accumulate and result in a ban.
Nobody "banned" you for 3 days. You were issued an infraction and, based on the number of points you are carrying, the Forum Software issued the ban.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/sciforums-site-rules.142880/
Knowingly posting false or misleading information
15. The intentional posting of false or misleading information is unacceptable. This includes posting half-truths, i.e. leaving out relevant and known information to give a false impression.
Do you understand what "false or misleading information" means? Because your current attempts to slander the volunteers of this forum fall into that category quite succinctly.
Additionally:
13. Appropriate supporting evidence or explanations should be posted together with any opinion, especially on contentious issues. Sciforums is not your personal blog, and should not be used to promote your unsupported opinions.
15. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. If you’re claiming that Einstein was wrong, or that evolution does not occur, or that aliens are visiting Earth, be prepared to provide strong evidence in defence of your argument. If you only have an opinion, avoid posting on topics such as these.
16. Avoid using logical fallacies in arguments.
Further down:
12. If you ask another member for evidence, be prepared to read the information that he or she provides for you. Don’t claim that evidence has not been provided just because you didn’t take the effort to read it.
Feedback and complaints
- Post general feedback in the Site Feedback subforum.
- Post matters of general interest regarding site policies and moderation in the Open Government subforum.
- Complaints about individual moderators should be directed to administrators using Personal Messaging. Do not post them in the public forums.
So... we have shown that you continue to flagrantly violate two quite simple forum rules, right off the bat...
Add on to this:
When posting:
- Start new threads in the appropriate subforum.
- Do not cross-post.
- Post on-topic. Avoid going off on a tangent - if you have to, start a new thread.
- Post personal information at your own risk.
- Be aware that you may be held legally liable for material you post.
- Be aware that your posts may remain on sciforums for years to come.
- Post clearly and coherently.
- Support your arguments with evidence.
- Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence.
- Avoid logical fallacies.
- Do not breach copyright laws.
- Do not post private messages to the public forums.
- Do not expect members to do your homework for you.
Behaviour that may get you banned
- Personal attacks on another member, including name-calling.
- Threats.
- Stalking.
- Flaming.
- Hate speech.
- Posting another member's private information without explicit consent.
- Posting gratuitous comments or images of an obscene, sexual, violent or graphic nature.
- Excessive profanity.
- Repeated off-topic posting.
- Plagiarism.
- Knowingly posting false or misleading information.
- Spamming or advertising.
- Posting on behalf of a banned member.
- Trolling.
- Repetitive or vexatious posting.
- Interfering with moderation.
- Propaganda, preaching, proselytising or evangelising.
- Being a repeat-offending drain on moderator time and effort.
You continuously post extraordinary claims without extraordinary supporting evidence, when asked for said evidence, you routinely tell the requester that you "won't do their homework for them" (despite the claim, and thus the burden of proof, being yours), you don't just use, but virtually base your arguments on logical fallacies, and when someone posts something you disagree with, you use the report function as though you feel you can wield the moderators as some kind of personal weapon (not to mention that you have a penchant for reporting infractions you are issued). In short, you are a massive drain on moderator time and effort.