This History Will Be

Status
Not open for further replies.
AE suggested curved space time. IN suggested density. Both are correct. Every point from the center of the sun to the end of the helio-sheath is in a 'curved space'-disk, rotating and resonating, and being compressed by z,z' allowing for and forming y,y' and x,x'.
 
History is a constant, it is the events within history that are variable, and it is the continuation of events which is history. ergo, events is a constant, the variable is the content of event, which is the continuation of history.
 
Ekpyrotic scenario; A brief Introduction to the ekyprotic universe;; by Paul J. Steinhardt,, Princeton, University.....
 
Last edited:
So does that mean that the collision of D-branes is at exactitude, and geometry of the compressed compression pressure density takes' form and evolves. Would that be a universal condition? Background 'space-time' loaded with resonances? geometries and sizes. Fpp' volume area. for all sizes allowable, and all geometrical form.
 
So does that mean that the collision of D-branes is at exactitude, and geometry of the compressed compression pressure density takes' form and evolves.
Yes.
Would that be a universal condition?
Yes.
Background 'space-time' loaded with resonances?
Yes.
geometries and sizes. Fpp' volume area. for all sizes allowable, and all geometrical form.
Yes.

No, not really I am just kidding - basically everything you have written in this thread is gibberish. I noticed no one is participating in this thread so I thought I would give you a thrill.
 
Since you cannot refute compressed compression pressure density I would say you are the one talking gibberish. Objective criticism is a welcome event, subjective innuendos are for the majority (sic)......
 
Since you cannot refute compressed compression pressure density I would say you are the one talking gibberish. Objective criticism is a welcome event, subjective innuendos are for the majority (sic)......
The problem is "compressed compression pressure density" is meaningless drivel. You are the one that must support your claim. Why don't you define what "compressed compression pressure density" means.
 
why don't you read and work the math and geometry of compressed compression pressure density on page 9 in the cesspool.? I also do not have to prove to you what it is. Clap your hands, as a resonance of 'what'?
 
why don't you read and work the math and geometry of compressed compression pressure density on page 9 in the cesspool.?
Copy and paste it here, I don't want to wade through the cesspool.
I also do not have to prove to you what it is.
You certainly don't. However, the way science works, is that if you have a new idea it is incumbent on the presenter to back up the claim with evidence. If you are more interested in just making pseudo-science pronouncements you can do that to.
Clap your hands, as a resonance of 'what'?
I have no idea what that is suppose to mean.
 
As I started compressed compression pressure density as gravity density, I was looking for questions from others, to help me understand it better. You certainly don't want me to go through all of the bs that I received again. do you? because that will not happen. Some people are not able to see and experience the uniqueness of the normal. It really is sophisticated and obvious and is a part of the lexicon of objective reality. Also, it cannot be disproved.......I recently posted about the ekyprotic scenario for 'universal formation', my interest is the collision of branes, and the geometries within and the structure of the collision. Also, all of space-time-mass is compressed compression pressure density, by definition of the 'solidness' of the collision of branes.?? ......Personally, I prefer the collision of two spheres of compressed momentum. One of the styles of dm.
 
Last edited:
Okay, fine.

What is "compressed compression pressure density" supposed to mean?
 
You won't be able to understand it, since all that I have written has been read by your self and you are 'still' unable to conceptualize it, or apply it, or follow through with the next question's'.
 
ANY (and EVERY) possibility will EVENTUALLY be realised, especially if every combination is worked through. :)

If it CAN be done it WILL be done.
 
You won't be able to understand it, since all that I have written has been read by your self and you are 'still' unable to conceptualize it, or apply it, or follow through with the next question's'.
Well then I guess you are done.

Compressed - squeezed
Compression - squeezing
Pressure - force applied to an area
Density - mass per volume

Compressed compression pressure density = squeezed, squeezing, force applied to an area, mass per volume = nonsense.
 
can you imagine a collision &/or friction or motion so intense, huge and compressed that its' layers are 'strings'? With a mechanical duration/time line equal to the total possible age of the universe, (at a given density).......You are correct, but you should ask of geometry, and its' relevance.....Is it only formed by transfer of ke*2? Collision, friction, motion. (alone and in combination)
 
Last edited:
With the realizations' that you now have, except for your error of defining it as nonsense, do you see a form of 'dark matter'?........which is compressed compression pressure density. Fabulous 'material' it is. Tons upon tons of force pressure density producing gravity and the states and yet in a compression 'vacuum' state. Wow. geometrical, stylistic, exactitude, occupying 'all' size, ergo; all of 'space-time' except for that area that is in between, which is the allowability for that area. Space within space, within space, within space for as long as a number can exist, a size 'area' can exist. If there be a number possible, then that is a corresponding size. It is size which is 'infinity'. .........Next question, what is the decay of a string? Since it is a form of 'dm' pressure density energy, then that energy should be readable, is there a ripple effect? discernible among the millions of styles of data, weight of pressure per volume area, then a string is I/n energy of/from formation pressure density.Which is an amount of first principle force pressure density.....would not 'weight of pressure per volume area' spatially interfere with light, r*4 expansion? and brightness and luminosity? velocity?......vacuum state excluded...... Can a string decay 'ripple', being a change in pressure density per volume area, cause changes in frequencies of things travelling through it, though it is compressed compression pressure density and it would have its' corresponding field states proportional to its' energy, so maybe in far fractions? or on 'surface' boundaries?
Can any measurement by any means be made? Are 'strings' 'decaying-ripples-energy' going on all the time all around us? Is there a log? Wow. That could be a lots of fun. Spatially logged decaying-rippling-energy of/from strings. There would be a lot of 'force-energy-density from such events. Touch it easily.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top