Science is certain since we can even use math for them. Math is certain since every answer in math is numbered. And if the origin topics are not certain, then, they are NOT origins at all and not science!
No since that is a fantasy from ToE.
That is a fantasy...
I feel comfortable with the idea that the generated living molecule that can replicate itself, is an initial form of intelligence, and that intelligence is compounded through the evolutionary process.
Idea is good, no problem but we have now 60+ definitions of intelligence. It is a mess! ToE had messed the topic of intelligence and you want to add more and mess it more??
I'm sure that 60+ forms of intelligence is not incompatible with the possibilities of the invariant natural laws
.Utter crap!
Please see previous answer above and rectify your ignorance.
That is why you need to clear that mess caused by ToE! One topic with 60+ definitions? Are you kidding me? What if half of them will be used to calculate IQ? WTF! Lol! As you can see that ToE had messed that topic! Oh please, don't add your version!I'm sure that 60+ forms of intelligence is not incompatible with the possibilities of the invariant natural laws
Notice that all these examples have electrons not all are intellen. Therefore something containing something intellen is not necessarily intellen. This property makes "intellen" look more like a value judgement than an objective scientific property of material things.
Notice that not all spheres are intellen, even though sphericity is the only listed reason for classifying the first as intellen. This behavior of the OP makes "intellen" look more like a value judgement than an objective scientific property of material things.
Notice that organisms can flip-flop repeatedly between naturen and intellen until finally ending as naturen. Even now the exact border between life and death is one of local legal definition rather than objective science. This property makes "intellen" look more like a value judgement than an objective scientific property of material things.
Notice no answer for the question where a possibly designed thing had no obvious purpose to the uninformed. Yet foxes, humans, electrons and spherical pieces of marble are immediately classed as "intellen" despite lack of teleological exposition. This behavior of the OP makes "intellen" look more like a value judgement than an objective scientific property of material things.
No part of the theory of biological evolution, which I prefer to call common descent via natural selection, requires a definition of intelligence because it does not assume teleology or intelligent intervention, just as Newton's law of universal gravitation does not assume angels hold the planets to their orbits and therefore doesn't need an exposition on the types and numbers of angels.
I understand that Math is the language but if the language is not certain, then, it is not science. And why we should accept that it is science?
I won't, not here at least. One more point: Highly evolved intelligence generally is able to recognize other forms of intelligence, but all forms of intelligence might not necessarily appreciate the higher forms of intelligence. Good luck.
Why? I though this was a science discussion.
OK, you're not serious. Go away.
What you conclude is your own business, but I suggest based on the religiously inspired, philosophical claptrap that you have preached so far, that your nonsensical philosophy will like all past religions, beliefs and myths, slowly fade into oblivion as will you return to whence you came...that is star dust.
Why does somebody have to know about the real intelligence in order to work out the age of the Earth? Isn't that a question of geology, radioactive dating, or whatever?
