Paddoboy, you have a problem, you do not stick to point and immediately start talking about agenda etc. I am not making Professor Bennett as arbitrator in our argument. Because you are a fun, not any arguments at all with you henceforth on science. I have agreed to all the correct things which you have said, I cannot agree to anything nonsense by you, and when I try to counter, you start a canary music of agenda, mainstream, troll, reputable links .......all crap cacophony.
You are so insecure that you want the prof to endorse your views on that kiddy stuff which you have put up in that funny BB / BH thread you referred to.
Never ever you provide logical argument in your language to whatever is objected on your points. See your replies to my red color posting, all nonsense by you...no science at all.
Wrong on just about all accounts.
I'm simply letting the Professor know your history and general anti standard accepted cosmology view.
You have not yet admitted you are wrong on any count that I recall, and you have been drastically wrong on many.
Professor Link on the issue of this paper, simply added more advice for you to and a critique of the paper...But just as from page one when your nonsense was totally invalidated, and just as all the errors you have made and that I and others have pointed out and referenced to boot, you fail to concede or admit any error.
Of course if I am wrong, you will be able to show me where you have conceded anything at all.
Not much more needs to be said, other then your record speaks for itself.
And your paper is nothing more than a fabricated scenario, to reinforce your belief that BHs do not exist.
I would also be very careful how you tread here, as it has been shown that when you are backed into a corner, you'll fabricate even more nonsense.
In an earlier thread it was accusing me of fudging an E-Mail from Professor Hamilton, now you sink to even further depths of depravity by calling others cowards.
You have lost in regards to this paper. Accept it like a man, and do better with your next paper.
ps; and I'll be there to critique that one too, to the best of my ability.