LOL! A humanoid primate would crack nuts with a rock AND do art crafts just like humans do. So your complaint is entirely bogus. Ofcourse a Bigfoot could do both.
If something is so primitive, it wouldn't be doing arts and crafts. Yet we are meant to believe, you and the people you are touting are the experts, that a giant monkey raped a human female and bore the sasquatch. That is essentially what Melba and her ilk claimed. Not only that, Melba (and now you) is claiming that this monkey human child is braiding horse hair, carving stick figures in trees as art, but is still eating nuts in the woods and breaking them open with rocks - despite apparently being big enough to snap large trees in half, they need small rocks to break open nuts. If they were that strong, they would be breaking the nuts open with their fingers. They wouldn't require tools. Which brings me to another point. Here is a giant human hybrid, that can, if the researchers you linked to in this thread and in the OP, snap big arse trees in half, but they throw tiny little rocks at hunting huts?
Not only that, these giant, break big trees in half apes, are gentle enough to braid a few strands of horse manes - apparently these giant super strong apes aren't scaring horses at all as they approach them at night to braid their manes. And are sensitive enough to be carving tiny little stick figures in tree bark. And apparently are surviving on nuts... Because something with a body mass that big would only require a small handful of nuts to live on.
The level of gullibility of some people is painful.
Backpeddling on the rock throwing bear thesis again? And no, humans don't prank a cabin of researchers over a period of 4 years out in the remote woods of the Oklahoma mountains. It's as ridiculous as your bear theory. Clearly the creatures are indemic to that area, and show attributes no human or other animal could mimic.
You are still not getting it.
It could have been a bear. Or it could have been absolutely fake and the researchers are doing it themselves or simply lying about it. All of which is much more plausible than claims that it is bigfoot.
You have absolutely no proof that it was bigfoot. Until they film bigfoot picking a girly sized rock to throw at their cabin roof, you cannot claim anything at all.
LOL! It's covered with fur. Ofcourse it could survive.
On what?
Is it eating snow? There is a reason why bears hibernate through winters. You are expecting people to believe that giant monkey type "humanoids" that are strong enough to snap trees in half, is existing on a few scrounged nuts in snow and ice through winters?
Plenty of deer in Oklahoma...as well as wild hogs.
And zero evidence that they are hunting. Where do they sleep in the winter? How do they survive the cold? Why haven't these so called researchers looked at the caves in the areas and why are they restricting them solely to forests? Do you understand how and why this makes no sense at all?
If they bury their dead, that explains the missing bones. And ofcourse they could throw rocks. Other primate species show the same territorial behavior in the wild.
You have claimed that people saw them bury their dead. No bones or bodies collected from those. Which beggars belief.
Why would they throw rocks? They are giant bloody monkeys that can snap big trees in half according to the so called research you linked. They could crush those huts and cabins. And they throw tiny little rocks?
If they were territorial and wanted to assert their dominance and strength (which is why chimpanzees do it), they would actually do so by showing their actual strength in front of the people they were trying to assert their dominance over. Not hide in the shrubbery and throw little rocks. Ergo, your claim makes absolutely zero sense.
You don't know how many there are.
I know exactly how many there are.
Because unless there are thousands, they would have bred themselves out of existence. And seeing how supposedly rare they are and how they can never be seen, how their bones can never be found, how where they actually dwell can never be found, it's a safe bet that they do not exist.
Right..like gorillas did. lol!
The only reason gorillas did not become extinct is because they are in a protected park, with armed rangers protecting them.
I already showed you that Gigantopithecus existed and all we have of it are teeth. So it's entirely plausible that many primate cousins of humans existed alongside us that never got fossilized.
Not in the way you are trying to claim.
No we do NOT know all the dinosaurs that existed. We only have fossils of less than half of them.
But they have a fairly general idea of what and which existed where. There has never been any evidence of large primates or hominids existing in the Americas aside from
Homo Sapiens. Neanderthals didn't even head into America. Nor did
Homo erectus. That should tell you something.
Not if they were adapted to colder climates. Bears never migrated south. Creatures tend to stay in the climates their adapted to.
Gigantopithecus existed in tropical areas of Asia. So do other large apes.
Non sequiter. They would've died of heat stroke and starvation in the hot unforested regions of the south.
No. Not in the tens of thousands of years ago when they would have crossed over. Not to mention a lot of the regions that are now without trees are that way because farmers and others cut down the trees for use and land clearing. And what you know of today is not how it would have been tens of thousands of years ago.
So where's all this evidence of faked research just to make money? Should be all over the news by now. Bigfoot organizations raking in millions and faking their results. Do you have any evidence of fakery going on on the level you are claiming? Or are you just poisoning the well again because well, we all know people aren't honestly researching bigfoot, right?
So where are all these fakers you are alleging? How come we don't hear about them on the news? Surely you have more evidence for fakery than just the moral assumption that people who hunt bigfoot are all rotten con artists just out to make a buck?
I provided you with ample examples. Oh, and there was this,
Ketchum's DNA she self published and you keep referring to:
It's been five years since Texas veterinarian and genetics researcher Melba Ketchum began studying DNA samples from a creature she calls Bigfoot. She published her findings in a "scientific journal," thoughthe only article to appear in the DeNovo Journal of Science was Ketchum's study, a fact that drew plenty of criticism fromscientists and reporters.
Fed up by this hazy proof of "Sasquatch genomes," Houston Chronicle reporter Eric Berger sent some of Ketchum's DNA samples to an independent geneticist for analysis.
The result? The 100 DNA samples that Ketchum claimed proved the existence of a hybrid mix between homo sapiens and an unknown primate were actually the genetic makeup of ... an opossum.
"LOL" indeed.
