That's the great thing about the alternative theories section - you can just avoid the section and avoid him altogether! If TC keeps his postings here then no one need wade through his nonsense in the topical forums.
The little things I mentioned that is new science!
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
On thescienceforum if you put a poster on ignore you still get a message that there's a post you're ignoring. Here, it's as though TC doesn't exist.
Much better.
In fact if you ignore the original poster the thread doesn't appear at all.
Much better.
In fact if you ignore the original poster the thread doesn't appear at all.
Last edited:
The third observer who records the entire robots existence on a cheap casio digital watch, witnesses no change or dilation in time.
No you are wrong. The third observer would detect a time dilation for 1 or both of the robots depending on the 3rd observers inertial frame.
No they would not, the 3rd observer monitoring the experiment of both clocks, reveals their own time does not change, they also observe that the stationary atomic clock is the same as their time, they observe that all atomic clocks at an equal force of newtons, that time stays the same, they observe move the clock from gravity and then the beats change showing that the atomic clock does not run at a constant to the other clocks.
Wishing for things does not make them come true. You don't have access to a genie. These things have been tested and verified. Google: muon decay.
I do not need to google Muon decay, again a muon flows through time, living longer is not a change in time.
As Russ said you are simply wrong. The evidence says you are wrong. You are apparently unaware of the actual results from experimentation. That does not mean you can make up your own ideas that conflict with reality, it only means you are ignorant of the facts.
Once again, your inability to understand the meaning of experimental result does not mean the results are wrong, it only means you are unable to understand the results.
Time in a void is endless with no start, a void is timeless, without matter there is nothing to time, no Caesium atoms, no light clock, no you, an absolute infinity and an absolute zero value that does not alter unless matter enters the reference frame.
What you do not understand is that whilst you do all these experiments and observations and everything else science thinks it does, you are doing this within time, an observer from beyond your visual boundary limitations would time all your interactions within time, and show no change.
You are always on the inside and what happens on the inside does not effect the outside, do you understand it now?
No, I do not understand gibberish, I only understand english (and un poco espanol)
In simple terms, science defines everything to being within a box.
So you prefer to continue with the meaningless diversion rather than address the actual point?
Okay.
You're talking mostly bollocks again.
I have addressed the topic point several times, the Caesium clock is not a constant.
''Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, sometimes described as a paradox, devised by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935. It illustrates what he saw as the problem of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics applied to everyday objects. The scenario presents a cat that is randomly put in a state where alive and dead are both possibilities, requiring further observation to determine which. ''
That wasn't the topic ...
Ooh look.
A pop-sci "explanation" of Schrödinger - and one that doesn't tell you the actual point.
What's YOUR point in posting this?
In even simpler terms, you have no idea what you are talking about.
You have addressed the point several times and have been wrong every time! Time is not constant. There is no universal clock.
Incorrect! He may not be able to see the small change in time (due to the inaccuracy of the Casio) but nevertheless ANY accurate timepiece will run slower under the same conditions.
You've got it in your head that somehow some clocks are "broken" by gravity or speed. That is not the case. Time itself slows down, and any accurate clock, no matter how cleverly constructed, will show this.