Yes, I recall reading that [atheism combined with agnosticism] was the most common "religious POV" in modern Israel.
I haven't seen the assertion but if someone has statistics I wouldn't doubt it. It's hardly remarkable.
It's time to remember that Judaism is a religion of
laws, not
doctrine. Keeping kosher, respecting the Sabbath, honoring the dead in the prescribed ways, observing the most sacred holidays like Yom Kippur, and practicing the other rituals such as having a
mezuza by the door to kiss... any member of the community who does these things more-or-less reliably is counted as a Jew. If he does not believe in supernatural creatures and other phenomena, this is simply a matter for spirited debate... as long as he doesn't do something outrageous like standing up at a Friday night service and shouting, "You're all idiots, God is imaginary!"
So atheism or agnosticism does not automatically disqualify one from being counted as a Jew. It may, however, result in frequent visits from the local rabbi to try to
convince one by logic and reasoning that God exists.
I don't know or care if that is true, but have long wondered if the state of Israel can both (1) remain a Jewish state and (2) educate its population so well.
Refer back to my earlier post with the
three definitions of "Jewish." Israel is a Jewish
community and embraces people who satisfy any of the three definitions. Although Zionism was founded by people who satisfied the religious definition, this was largely overwhelmed by the postwar refugees, who only needed to satisfy the ancestry definition to have been targeted by the Holocaust--and a garbled version of that definition to boot.
I don't have solid evidence but have noted a strong tendency for people like me* and your ancestors to lose their religious faiths as they become more educated.
My Jewish great-grandparents did not lose their religious faith due to education. They
abandoned their cultural identity in order to become members of a community who welcomed them and treated them as equals. Few of us alive today in the USA (well those of us who have light skin, anyway) and other more-or-less modern Western countries can imagine what life was like for Jews in Europe 150 years ago, so we can't imagine what it felt like to set foot on Ellis Island and be matriculated by a government agent who didn't give a damn about their ancestry or religion.
Not all of course, especially not those some Jesuit priest instructed when they were young.
My conversations with people who attended Jesuit universities indicate that their view of religion is more akin to that of the Reform Jewish rabbis: justify it by logic, not just faith; and please put more effort into being a good citizen than a good Catholic--after all, isn't that what Jesus wants anyway? We now have the first Jesuit Pope, so it will be interesting to see how this plays out on a larger canvas.
What do you think? is a Jewish state compatible with high quality education for centuries?
Yes, at least by what I see as the relevant definition of "Jewish." They allow anyone to claim citizenship who satisfies the Law of Return (must have a Jewish mother), and do not ask questions about faith or politics. Mrs. Fraggle went there as a tourist (long before I met her) and they were constantly pleading with her to emigrate. Her mother was Jewish by ancestry but not by culture, religion or choice of community. She was raised Episcopalian and is now a Buddhist.
tifillen (spelling error)
It's usually transliterated
tefillin, plural of
tefillah. In older, scholarly works you might see it as
tephillin since the letter
Fe in Ancient Hebrew is transcribed as PH rather than F, same as Greek
phi.
I don't know if anyone out there has a solid estimate, but based on personal anecdotes and reading, I would put the number of "Jewish atheists" at way, way more than just a few thousand.
Estimates vary since polls are unreliable, but very roughly five percent of the U.S. population identify ourselves as atheists in private polls. Since atheism correlates highly with level of education, and since the Jewish community taken as a whole has a high average level of education, I would reasonably assume that a considerably larger fraction of that population are atheists.
Nonetheless, remember that one can be a member in good standing of almost any American temple (surely excluding the Chassidim) without having to believe in the supernatural aspects of the Jewish religion, but merely obeying the Jewish laws. So there are surely a large number of Jewish atheists who don't keep a high profile since they love
latkes and
gefilte fish.
I wouldn't be surprised if you could find at least a million Jews proclaiming either atheistic or agnostic beliefs just in Israel alone.
Having known a few Israeil expats, I'd guess more.
You don't have to be a devout, practising Catholic to call yourself an Irish or Italian American, right?
No, but "Catholic" is strictly a religious identification, not an ethnonym or demonym. "Jewish," as I explained at greater length in my earlier post, is a confusing name with three overlapping definitions. After all, there is a large population of Muslim Israelis--so many that the Jews worry (based on simple mathematics) that they will become the majority in another generation or two.
It all depends on what's meant by "Jewish state". If it's a state that perpetually subsidizes certain religious practises and discriminates against others or against entire sectors of the population, then it won't have much of a future to look forward to. If it's a state where a majority of the citizens identify themselves as Jews in more of a national or cultural sense, fit some generalized criterion for being called Jews, and gives preference to immigrants who identify themselves thusly, then its future looks as bright as any other self-determining ethnic/religious majority nation state on the planet. I believe the religious elements of Jewish nationalism draw their main appeal from the perpetual history of worldly double-standards that continue to be applied to them as a people, and as a reaction to the even stronger religious nationalism of their most vocal opponents.
Originally, "Jewish state" meant nothing more or less than a place where Jews (by any definition of the word) would always be safe from persecution. (If not from attacks by hostile neighboring states and by the people who thought it was
their homeland.) That is, after all, the reason for its founding. The Europeans were so profoundly sorry for the way they had treated the Jews for 2,000 years, culminating in the Holocaust, that they were willing to do anything to apologize. Anything, that is, except let them move back into their own countries. So instead, the British gave them someone else's country, in a gesture that I refer to as "The moribund British Empire's final extended middle finger to the rest of the world," as we now have one refugee population fighting with another and virtually everyone else taking sides.
I should note, there are plenty of practising Jews who openly admit the absurdity of seeking more evidence for the reliability of a used car than for an invisible omnipotent being on whose basis they're making long-term lifestyle choices. There are plenty of people amongst all the faiths who go through the motions but are really sitting on the fence with their own doubts, perhaps some of them simply don't care to know either way.
Jews aren't the only people, of whom many casually identify with a religion because of family, community or culture, without devoting much serious thought to it.