anything is possible.
the owners are zox and pseudo.
It was text, not audio. Maybe you just thought you heard "paranoid".
How can you ever be sure that it's not someone else disguised as me?
My virtual enzymes are specifically activated to dissolve styrofoam.
Consistently you do keep remarking.
Those sneaky little mods. I thought they were following me! You mean they're following you? Hrummph!
Do you feel persecuted on the inside and on the outside? Oh, the humanity.
Ah, the minions. It's all so political. And your 6th grade trauma with the teachers' pets comes home to roost.
I know! Uber-fascist ultra-elitist pseudo-scientists are Blitzkrieg-ing your wunderbar.
You mean illustration? Wow, I bet you can visualize pseudoscientists with a certain savoir-faire. It's all light, lines, perspective and--tension. It's all about the tension. Hey, are you the guy downtown on the heating grates who does portraits?
Did you stay for a while, or were you cutting across campus to the life drawing class?
Wow, the minion of an actual researcher. A social roboticist antipseudoscientist illustrator.
You mean you carry a laptop around? Mine's sessile right now, but you never know when it starts pulling some gees.
Does that include the time you toilet-papered the chem teacher's house? Is that why they tickle-tortured you on the playground, when you had your "accident"?
They refunded your ticket to Shrek 15 times? Liar.
The Army and Navy cadets in line for Shrek each gave you a fist bump. Fascist Pseudofistist.
You rolled the TV into the kitchen during halftime, then back in the living room afterwards, during the commercials. Hahahaha. You missed the best part.
The Kool-Aid stand and the newspaper route! Me, too!!
Mr Spielberg! Steven! I love your work!
A dime in the Salvation Army drum is hardly "major".
Somewhere else I thought you said "autistic".
Yes, they said you were out standing in the field.
Sure you are. We believe you. Really, we do.
Of course. You draw mechanicals. And pseudoscientisticalists.
You play a harmonica on the subway for spare change.
They gave you refunds on the bootleg 8-tracks.
You can Google.
Now that can't be true. Unless they're paying you to persecute me.
You refurbish diplomas? Hey, whatever pays the bills.
You're writing a paper on trolling.
Good. Then you've learned something at SciForums.
Hola, hue. Orale.
Hugh who?
I'm sure the Shrek box office worker is shaking in her boots.
Oh, no bother. The pleasure is totally mine.
You actually think people make stuff up? Another vile invention.
They weren't supposed to show our colors. We had a vow of secrecy!
No, the Peter Max posters I ordered were delivered in time.
You mean you can't tell? Word of advice: try not to act like one. It's a dead give-away.
This coming from a Shrekkie. Still my beating heart.
° ° Brrrrrp ° ° Ah-hah. Yayyah. Sirius: Aisle 3, Astronomy.
I see no evidence of anything being "hidden". I do see a lot of paranoia on your part however. And what is your obsession with SeaGypsy? Your own "research" turned up a link to find her. Go ask the Squirrel. His nest is actually a nice forum albeit a little sparse...
Yes, I think it is my business and any member's business. Science must be objective for it to accomplish it's goals. A science discussion forum should also be objective. I don't want to unknowingly walk into bad place and waste my good effort on things that will end up in a trash can. I don't see why I am seemingly the only person on this site who expresses a wish to be able to engage in polite, serious discussion and debate on scientific topics. Why do you all love this place so much that you want to kill this messenger?
This forum, and the others I have mentioned should attempt to provide a public good. They should not do crappy science and they sure shouldn't pose as a science discussion forum in order to fool people into believing their politically motivated disinformation. In my mind, that sort of deception is almost criminal. The fact that all of these forums are so bad and so incestuous at the same time can only be seen as suspect, IMHO. They are either the result of a conspiracy, or they are the result of human nature gone ape-shit, or a combination of the two.
BTW, how come you guys don't ever ask me about where I get my funding? I am pretty persistent, huh? Strangely, thematically, perhaps purposefully(?) so. Real scientists are never as incurious as you seem to be.
---Futilitist
Also, my serious question still hangs, embarrassingly. Here it is again for those who were distracted by the last few posts.
Will someone please respond to this?:
Here is some interesting stuff. Bear in mind that I wouldn't even be looking for stuff like this if I wasn't so bored after my thread was disrupted.
SkinWalker is a mod on this site. He is also the owner and administrator of thescienceforum.o r g.
http://www.sciforums.com/member.php?11988-SkinWalker
If you click on "SkinWalker's Acitivity", this is what you get:
So SkinWalker is a mod who has no posts. That makes no sense.
If I pick a name of a banned member off of the newly revised ban list, I get similar results.
First, an advanced search for a name:
Here is the result:
If I do manage to get to her profile page, here is what comes up:
If I click on "Find latest posts", I get this message:
If I click on "seagypsy's Acitivity", here is what I get:
Yet if I do a google search:
I get lots of listings:
---Futilitist
We do not hide personal profiles. There are there for members to see.
And no, we do not hide secrets. We don't need to Futilitist. You have no secrets from us. I am currently parked outside your house, stealing your internet and going through your rubbish bins to learn even more about you.
Nice bedside lamp by the way.
If you wish to see what they posted and when, you are free to click on their profiles on this site. It is not hidden. What is possible is that the search functions for their posts may have expired, with the software being what it is, it would not surprise me. In fact, I just did a search of my own posts and it stated that I do not have any.
You are googling members and former members of this site and then accusing this site of apparently hiding their profiles. We are not hiding their profiles.
What he does with his time is no one else's business but his own.
No, we do not.
You are invading her privacy by posting information of where she is apparently posting now without her explicit consent.
And I am going to give you one final warning now. If you persist in spamming this same question over and over again, even though it has been answered fully (there is no conspiracy or hidden profiles) and wasting my time and everyone else's time and making a fool of yourself, I will moderate you.
A lot. Please keep posting.
---Futilitist
are you serious?
correct, but given the above it is clear that sciforums is indeed knowingly and deliberately preventing a banned members posts from appearing with a name or profile search.
I can't remember having an issue finding it in the past.
nice opinion, but i wasn't commenting on the political slant of the board.