London riots: Violence erupts for third day

Are gangsters beginning to prevail all over the world starting with U.K.? :eek: :p

Sorry I know this is very bad news for the unfortunate poor people who are affected by this.
 
Last edited:
bells
of course
i was around during the la riots and london seems pretty much a replay
police brutality, the violent protests and the subsequent opportunism

i remember being disappointed that these dumbfucks burnt down their own neighborhoods rather than those in beverly hills.

and of course our crazy korean shopkeepers armed themselves to the teeth and shot vandals

man, what a blast!

/proud
 
Last edited:
Are gangsters beginning to prevail all over the world starting with U.K.? :eek: :p

Actually the "Gangsters" are just punks, It's not like the 50's-60's where you had the Kray's making sure such little gangs didn't cause problems (After all there is no corruption of kickbacks if certain police watches were kept clear of trouble)

Perhaps that's the alternative to an Army solution, bring back organised crime, after all they don't answer to liberal laws so they make people fear them, (Or just introduce them to a dirt nap.)

[Btw, this isn't a real POV, just an angle.]
 

From that commentary, the girl 'approached the Police standing line' ie, that the riot had already commenced? This didn't take place outside the Police station during the family protest? Also, it's ONE guy reporting this, with no footage, careful what you believe. Either way, there's no excuse for looting businesses, or setting fire to citizens cars, and the guy that got shot was a gangsta with an illegally converted blank firing pistol, so no great loss to society.
 
At least one eyewitness claims the cops were holding him face down on the ground, and shot him in the back of the head repeatedly.

Except he was shot twice, once to the chest, and once to the bicep, so the eyewitness is a rabble rousing asshole telling lies to inflame the situation.

I think you may be confusing the shootings of this gangsta asshole who deserved a bullet, and the completely innocent Jean Charles de Menezes. Please be careful what you repeat, we don't need anger building up on false rumours.
 
all those who are not enemies of the working man have nothing to fear

These rioters aren't working men. They are dole scum chavs on a robbing spree.

Note, how every town has a dole office, which is operated by the government. Note how none have been burned in protest against the government. Because all of these scumbags need that place to go and get their dole money.

There is NO justification for these riots. People in England are not poor by real world standards, and these rioters are not stealing food, nor fighting oppression, but helping themselves to clothes, mobile phones and televisions.
 
bells
of course
i was around during the la riots and london seems pretty much a replay
police brutality, the violent protests and the subsequent opportunism

i remember being disappointed that these dumbfucks burnt down their own neighborhoods rather than those in beverly hills.

and of course our crazy korean shopkeepers armed themselves to the teeth and shot vandals

man, what a blast!

/proud
Hmmm..

Because those in Beverly Hills had what to do what to do with the Rodney King beatings again....?

There is nothing to be proud of in beating and attempted murder of innocent people simply because of their colour. If you were proud of what happened during the LA Riots, then you would be just as bad as those who supported the officers who beat Rodney King.

Back to the UK riots..

When the BBC asked two youths why they were rioting, one responded: "Right, why are you going to miss the opportunity to get free stuff that's worth, like, loads of money?"



And then the by-line..

But they said it was not just about that, adding it was in response to government cuts.

One added: "How many people have they arrested really, though, 10? I'm not really bothered. I'll keep doing this every day until I get caught."

He said he might be shouted at or grounded when he returned home but he would "live with that".

He added that it would be his first offence "so I'm not really bothered".

Of course, after looting the stores, then they set fire to it.. because of the Government cuts apparently.. They also set fire to a local library and attacked and mugged students.

It is fair to say that while the start of this was about anger against the police and the Government's austerity measures, it is now children out to grab what they can.

If those little snots were my children, I'd strip them down to their underwear and march them down there and make them clean it up with their toothbrush.
Big Chiller said:
Are gangsters beginning to prevail all over the world starting with U.K.?

No. Just stupid children and even stupider parents for not knowing where their children are and what they are doing. Especially the parents of these children:

It has emerged children who appeared to be as young as nine or 10 were among rioters running wild, looting and damaging property in Manchester earlier.

[Source]
 
We should start making low cost prisons for them on the uninhabited islands of the Shetlands. No buildings, just tents.
 
Now the disturbances have come to my own county of Gloucestershire. They did not come to Cheltenham (white, Chinese ethnic minority), Tewkesbury (white), Cirencester (white), or Stroud (white).

The disturbances -- smashed shop windows and a disused building burned -- came to the City of Gloucester with its significant ethnic minorities but still 90% white. They did not come to any one of a dozen white suburbs; they came to the immigrant-infested Barton area. I presume that white kids did not travel into that area to start the havoc.

When those arrested appear in court, I shall be surprised if they are not mostly black or mixed race -- but of one thing I can be fairly certain. BBC Radio Gloucestershire is not going to tell me they were black, because if you work for the BBC and want to keep your job you had better not notice the elephant in the room.

Anyone who listened to Radio Gloucestershire this morning and the discussion of this outbreak of violence, but was ignorant of the ethnic geography of the city, would be quite unaware that the kids responsible were other than white. In discussion of the cause, race was not allowed to me mentioned.

If you are relying on the BBC as a source of information on England's spasm of lawlessness you may not have gathered that all the troubles have happened in areas that are really no longer part of England, or of what England used to be (that is to say, English) -- or else they have occurred in adjacent areas that have been subjected to invasion.
 
If you are relying on the BBC as a source of information on England's spasm of lawlessness you may not have gathered that all the troubles have happened in areas that are really no longer part of England, or of what England used to be (that is to say, English) -- or else they have occurred in adjacent areas that have been subjected to invasion.

Ah, so they can be born there all they like, but they are still not....English? *raises eyebrow*
Perhaps they have an even harder time getting jobs that would perhaps give them incentives to, say, not riot...

10% is not a significant ethnic minority, anyway. You can still oppress them. When it gets to be about 35% you can't keep them all second-class anymore...better look out...

attachment.php


You'll have to learn to speak jive at that point, my English friend.
 
Last edited:
RiverApe said:
When those arrested appear in court, I shall be surprised if they are not mostly black or mixed race -- but of one thing I can be fairly certain. BBC Radio Gloucestershire is not going to tell me they were black, because if you work for the BBC and want to keep your job you had better not notice the elephant in the room.
Friends of mine own a restaurant in north London which was vandalized and ransacked. They had one thing to say about the rioters and it was pretty unambiguous: "They were all black".

But your right, we should be careful talking about this, especially on a Christian forum like this where everything about you, from your intelligence, your abilities and talents and psychological traits to your taste in clothes and music is completely separate from your physical nature. It's a perfect dualism, no different to the belief that a woman can become pregnant without being inseminated. An immaculate conception at the heart of secular, Western liberalism and something which must be protected at all costs less people begin to question its founding myths of equality.

chimpkin said:
Ah, so they can be born there all they like, but they are still not....English? *raises eyebrow*
If you are born in the jungle does that make you a baboon?

Baboon live in the jungle because they cannot build and maintain a civilization, they're animals. Likewise, if you put one into a human civilization you can not assert that it is human, just because you dress it up in human clothes and get it to imitate some human mannerisms, even teach it some rudimentary use of language. "Hey look, this baboon is just like one of us, he can wear Nike trainers, eat take away chicken and even wear his hair like us. All those people who said baboons cannot be human are racists!"

When you find that, inevitably, the baboon cannot compete with other humans on an intellectual level, that he is a permanent member of his own biological underclass, you are forced into liberal contortions; it must be the result of our attitudes, our prejudices, society is institutionally racist. That's why the baboon cannot get ahead.

Then you are forced to re-structure society for the baboons benefit. Make school easier, subjects less complicated, re-name the zoo a university, include graduate courses in skateboarding and tree swinging, criticize all your own culture as elitist, especially anything involving the written word. Baboons use 'orature', that is their 'culture' is transmitted by mouth only, the written word is a symbol of Western imperialism and global white supremacy.
 
Now the disturbances have come to my own county of Gloucestershire. They did not come to Cheltenham (white, Chinese ethnic minority), Tewkesbury (white), Cirencester (white), or Stroud (white).


ha
serves you right, white man

David Cameron’s visit to India has attracted much media attention in the UK but for sections of the Indian media old questions remain regarding the theft of India’s diamond, which became part of the British Crown jewels and remains an important marker to determine whether the British government has truly altered its relationship with India.

When asked by local NDTV news channel whether he would return the diamond, Cameron responded “What tends to happen with these questions is that if you say yes to one, then you would suddenly find the British Museum empty. I know there is a great argument about the original provenance of the Kohinoor diamond, but I am afraid to say it’s going to stay put.”



haha


underneath that professed veneer of civilization beats the hearts of rapacious plunderers intent on clinging to their ill gotten gains
 
Last edited:
The evil White West, of course. What else causes all the ills and problems of the world?


Shockingly, even the Taj Mahal was not spared. David Carroll reports: "..By the nineteenth century, its grounds were a favorite trysting place for young Englishmen and their ladies. Open-air balls were held on the marble terrace in front of the main door, and there, beneath Shah Jahan"s lotus dome, brass bands um-pah-pahed and lords and ladies danced the quadrille. The minarets became a popular site for suicide leaps, and the mosques on either side of the Taj were rented out as bungalows to honeymooners. The gardens of the Taj were especially popular for open-air frolics....."

"At an earlier date, when picnic parties were held in the garden of the Taj, related Lord Curzon, a governor general in the early twentieth century, "it was not an uncommon thing for the revellers to arm themselves with hammer and chisel, with which they wiled away the afternoon by chipping out fragments of agate and carnelian from the cenotaphs of the Emperor and his lamented Queen." The Taj became a place where one could drink in private, and its parks were often strewn with the figures of inebriated British soldiers...



simply marvelous! :D
 
Back
Top