Being an insufferable bitch i.e. moderator rudeness.
- Thread starter invert_nexus
- Start date
- Status
WillNever
Valued Senior Member
i wouldn't describe myself as being modest, but i'm also not looking to offend anyone in THAT way. i don't have a tendency to look at people THAT way myself. i abhor pornography and everything associated with it. i tend to look at people as a whole person, and not just focus on their sexuality, or their body, or their clothes.
i think a focus like that hurts people.
how i intended to be offensive with that picture, was the message i intended to convey to gendy with it.
that being, "kiss my ass bitch".
Responding rationally is an obvious alternative. Obvious to some people, anyway.
Clearly, you wish, like scifes to have your prejudices pandered to. Strange how the view doesn't differ much on either side of the fence.
that was Q. it's expected. :shrug:
kira,
this is what i was responding to from the marriage thread...
Lori:
“
and my husband and i weren't really on that page. we were on the page where god brings two people together to have a child. and so honestly, we trusted god more than each other. it was actually quite traumatic what we did, but very well worth it.
”
gendanken:
Oh, really?
So how did it go then? Did he stare into those green dog eyes of yours and then running his hand through your dyed straw he stuck his thumb in your pudenda and you found that you liked it?
Of course at this point, that bastard hybrid of schizophrenic logic you call a conscience that you know somewhere deep down is a crock of shit began rationalizing this new sin into yet another more palatable lie you carry around like a cyst.
Because God makes no mistakes.
Because God wanted you to impale your hungry twat on this thumb.
Because, ultimately, fate is not an excuse for failure but part of God's divine plan for you to get ass.
You can also believe that you will ever be anything other than an addict.
and another that i think got deleted by a mod, but it's still in this quote...
Originally Posted by gendanken
Lori:
So, what's more disgusting:
Lori's husband sitting at work right now with a crust of pussy juice on his mustache-- his entire face smells like ass, and there's a pube curled up under his fingernails because just yesterday the two of these God-fearing people were happily licking the smegma off each other's genitals.
They've tried everything from whip cream to antifreeze to chickenwire to Neoprine rubber but nothing's ever beat sticking a raw fist up her greasy vagina.
Or
The pious fraud of these hungry degenerates distorting the guilty pleasure of sinning into a working pretense of service to Lord and humanity, so that any notion of God and acceptance is not compromised by a need to continue being the needy, ignorant little heathens they've always been.
I mean, would you really have us believe the two of you are strict missionary?
You, madam, are a lie.
*******
imo her words in this thread were way more degrading, offensive, and pornographic than my fully covered ass could ever be, and i reported these posts because i don't want to have the opportunity to read stuff like that on this site. i propose there are other sites for that stuff.
this is what i was responding to from the marriage thread...
Lori:
“
and my husband and i weren't really on that page. we were on the page where god brings two people together to have a child. and so honestly, we trusted god more than each other. it was actually quite traumatic what we did, but very well worth it.
”
gendanken:
Oh, really?
So how did it go then? Did he stare into those green dog eyes of yours and then running his hand through your dyed straw he stuck his thumb in your pudenda and you found that you liked it?
Of course at this point, that bastard hybrid of schizophrenic logic you call a conscience that you know somewhere deep down is a crock of shit began rationalizing this new sin into yet another more palatable lie you carry around like a cyst.
Because God makes no mistakes.
Because God wanted you to impale your hungry twat on this thumb.
Because, ultimately, fate is not an excuse for failure but part of God's divine plan for you to get ass.
You can also believe that you will ever be anything other than an addict.
and another that i think got deleted by a mod, but it's still in this quote...
Originally Posted by gendanken
Lori:
So, what's more disgusting:
Lori's husband sitting at work right now with a crust of pussy juice on his mustache-- his entire face smells like ass, and there's a pube curled up under his fingernails because just yesterday the two of these God-fearing people were happily licking the smegma off each other's genitals.
They've tried everything from whip cream to antifreeze to chickenwire to Neoprine rubber but nothing's ever beat sticking a raw fist up her greasy vagina.
Or
The pious fraud of these hungry degenerates distorting the guilty pleasure of sinning into a working pretense of service to Lord and humanity, so that any notion of God and acceptance is not compromised by a need to continue being the needy, ignorant little heathens they've always been.
I mean, would you really have us believe the two of you are strict missionary?
You, madam, are a lie.
*******
imo her words in this thread were way more degrading, offensive, and pornographic than my fully covered ass could ever be, and i reported these posts because i don't want to have the opportunity to read stuff like that on this site. i propose there are other sites for that stuff.
Think about what you mean here. What you are really saying.
What does the act of sex mean to you in marriage? Is everything you do with your lover/husband acceptable and natural?
How does it compare with showing your [fully covered] ass to a bunch of strangers on the internet?
When gendy gets graphic you should strip the words of all emotional content.
But its not pornographic, not if its love. Why should any physical expression of love between two lovers in a sanctioned union be pornography? Do you feel ashamed or violated by the act? Or is it the fact that gendy articulated it that makes you angry? Would it sound better with pretty words? Sex is sweaty and invasive, not just physically but emotionally.
I bet you felt violated by gendy's words. But you shouldn't, not if you believe in sex as a physical and sanctioned-by-God expression of love. Throughout, she only referred to the act as between you and your husband. She just didn't say it like the Song of Solomon.
I will not make any opinion unless I see the whole thread. Nevertheless, I wouldn't want anybody say that to me *cringe*. I understand why she was reported.
that's hard to do when it's the reason she's being graphic in the first place.
and i show my covered ass to a bunch of strangers every time i leave the house.
i don't think sex should be derogatory, and it's a shame when it is. at the same time i didn't see how talk of smegma, pubic hairs, pussy juice, and analinguous are really relevant to anything going on in this forum that's worth talking about.
i suppose my ass isn't either.
WillNever
Valued Senior Member
Nay, SAM. The baseline reaction to something you might find offensive should be to let it alone. That sort of gesture is a respectful and courteous norm. Allowing people to freely express unharmful views and protecting them from attack is not an ethnically specific attitude. Nor is it a prejudicial one. That is ONLY the attitude that should be pandered to. Let me illustrate with an example:
Imagine if there were one hundred people all in a large room together who are trying decide upon an activity to do. Those one hundred people come together and decide that they want to have an art exhibition. The first piece of art shown happens to contain some light nudity in it. The vast majority of people in the room are capable of observing the piece silently and maturely. But imagine that there is a small minority of muslims in the room, say... two out of the original hundred, and they both stand up from their chairs and shout "Excuse us, but we as muslims find THAT picture to be offensive to our religious values and our ethnicity. We want it concealed from EVERYONE'S view and we hereby criticize all of you for being inappropriate and insensitive to our values."
Now... ask yourself, is there anything wrong with the above picture? Ninety-eight of those people in the room are perfectly fine and accepting of the nude imagery and want to continue. Two of the people, who are not fine, want the activity shut down in order appease their personal values. What would be the mature reaction here? Is it more admirable for them to say:
"You know what? I don't find myself comfortable in an environment where depictions of nudity are freely displayed... but I still respect the majority's right to be comfortable with it. The two of us will now go into a diffferent room so that we can talk about God."
Or,
"I am angry and upset. I am deeply offended by the insensitivity of this large crowd. I am going to demand that they halt this exhibition so that all one hundred of us can do something together that will be safely unoffensive... like watch Barney."
I will leave the correct answer as an exercise for you to figure out.
Last edited:
Why do you think she used those specific terms? What difference does it make to you if your breast is called a tit instead of a pomegranate by someone you may never meet?
Back when I was reviewing the romance genre, I was totally surprised by Diana Palmers books. In almost all her books, the guys smell of sweat, cigar smoke and cattle manure and this apparently divine mixture of smells under the hot Texas sun is an aphrodisiac to the olfactory-challenged heroines that jump all over the men in her books. Even bodily excretions [including those of cattle] and nicotine discharges, it would seem, have their uses when it comes to sexual love. People actually pay money to read this shit.
The point is, if the use of such graphic terms of sex makes you react - you kinda make her point.
Hmmm, nothing too unusual about that person's posts. There's probably some underlying behind-the-scenes politics attached to this one.
the song of solomon is kinda funny isn't it?
pomegranates...sheesh.her point is she's got me all figured out, so she'll display her intellectual prowess by vomiting a bunch of gratuitous garbage all over the forum. if i want to read a bunch of gratuitous garbage, i can pick up a "romance" novel...not on sciforums.
the song of solomon is kinda funny isn't it?
her point is she's got me all figured out, so she'll display her intellectual prowess by vomiting a bunch of gratuitous garbage all over the forum. if i want to read a bunch of gratuitous garbage, i can pick up a "romance" novel...not on sciforums.
Uh uh thats not the point. If I was Diana Palmer, the women would stink to high heaven of sweat and shit and cigar smoke and the men would wash twice a day, never have morning mouth and always use after shave and deodorant and cologne. The women would dress for comfort, be moody and PMS'g and this would drive the men to distraction and lust.
After all, we women should be looking out for each other, not pandering to male notions of female sexuality.
But how many women you think would buy those books?
WillNever
Valued Senior Member
If it is liked or disliked, then it is already and irreversibly read. Nice try.
However, your example isn't analagous to mine. The majority in my example are showing something completely innocuous, that muslims like scifes find offensive. No harm is meant toward anybody, in that scenario, yet offensiveness is invented by the two muslims in the example.
That is not the situation in gendy's case. The source of her words is raw malice. That isn't a positive quality.
- Status