Enmos
Valued Senior Member
While that may be, one can hardly compare both offenses and say they are even remotely equal. On top of that, Gendy has built herself quite a reputation.
Being an insufferable bitch i.e. moderator rudeness.
- Thread starter invert_nexus
- Start date
- Status
While that may be, one can hardly compare both offenses and say they are even remotely equal. On top of that, Gendy has built herself quite a reputation.
Live by the sword die by the sword? Treat others how you would be treated? She was warned, banned, had her posts deleted, and returned to her normal pattern of insults and abuse. Why should I apologize to her for being insulting, when that's the only way I've ever seen her act?
gendanken is no doubt very intelligent, and very witty. But it's hard to argue that she isn't abrasive, profane, and generally insulting to everyone she talks to. I don't know a better definition of ``insufferable'' and ``bitch''. Do you?
Enmos
Valued Senior Member
I don't see your point. An intelligent witty insult is still an insult.
that's not why she gets banned. she gets banned because she's the god damned jerry springer show, and it's disgusting.
just like this pompous bunch of bullshit. if you can't figure out how to, or don't want to socialize, then by all means, don't do it.
Enmos,
A reputation which blinds people, by the way. Sometimes people can actually view the world, however, and not their preconception of it.
It is difficult.
Stop trying to switch frames. I'm answering a direct question from Snowflake with that piece you just quoted. It has nothing to do with whether or not I find Gendanken to be insulting.
Stick to the topic.
BentheMan,
Because you're a moderator and meant to be a shining light in the darkness?
Everyone? Really? Back that up.
From the reputation you've built up and also from your postings in here and those in question, I'd say that you're an insufferable bitch.
Would you?
Should I be banned and/or warned for that?
Also, as Gendanken so eloquently posted, she finds that other Snowflake to be a false, lolling piece of crap (my words, of course, not hers).
Should she be banned and/or warned for that?
Apparently the answer is yes to at least one of those questions.
Which?
Also, should you be banned and/or warned for the same offense?
Three identical situations.
Which deserve punishment and why?
You'd place your behavior as completely dependent upon Gendanken's behavior? Have you no self-respect then?
And how can it be honest? Sounds like the definition of false, to me.
Lori Snowflake,
Aren't there aol chat boards for people like you?
A reputation which blinds people, by the way. Sometimes people can actually view the world, however, and not their preconception of it.
It is difficult.
Stop trying to switch frames. I'm answering a direct question from Snowflake with that piece you just quoted. It has nothing to do with whether or not I find Gendanken to be insulting.
Stick to the topic.
BentheMan,
Because you're a moderator and meant to be a shining light in the darkness?
Everyone? Really? Back that up.
From the reputation you've built up and also from your postings in here and those in question, I'd say that you're an insufferable bitch.
Would you?
Should I be banned and/or warned for that?
Also, as Gendanken so eloquently posted, she finds that other Snowflake to be a false, lolling piece of crap (my words, of course, not hers).
Should she be banned and/or warned for that?
Apparently the answer is yes to at least one of those questions.
Which?
Also, should you be banned and/or warned for the same offense?
Three identical situations.
Which deserve punishment and why?
You'd place your behavior as completely dependent upon Gendanken's behavior? Have you no self-respect then?
And how can it be honest? Sounds like the definition of false, to me.
Lori Snowflake,
Aren't there aol chat boards for people like you?
As witty as a brick to the skull.
Definitely not as witty as a sixteen ton heavy thing.
Definitely not as witty as a sixteen ton heavy thing.
If she really was offended, then I'll apologize to her, after she recognizes the fact that she's been offensive to other people.
Offer still stands.
Though I don't expect to have it taken.
I think, other than that, I don't have anything else to say.
So, she doesn't need to apologize then? Merely state that she knows that she offended a Snowflake?
You know you're being hypocritical.
Why don't you just admit it?
It's really sad, guy.
I would.
Also. Stick to the facts of the matter.
I never said she was offended.
You calling her a snowflake?
I'm offended.
Apologize to me.
"people like me"? no, sociopath, there aren't.
aren't there islands for people like you? i'm envisioning a lord of the flies scenario.
i've been a member for over a decade and i've never been banned.
It was called sciforums.
Then there was a forecast for snowflakes.
I take it that 'sociopath' is meant to be insulting?
Not effective, of course, but what can one expect from a snowflake.
This is not the first time that this particular insult has been bandied about by this particular snowflake.
I'd expect her to be punished if she weren't to be defended.
You missed it. Oh well.
I don't think I can do that. I think only an admin has those privileges.
Acknowledge via an apology.
Enmos makes a good point above, how can you be so upset with the injustice of Gendanken being insulted, but seem to be fine with her insulting others? Hypocrisy and injustice aside, the world is an unfair place.
I've always known that sci smacks of privilege, but that's the way this place is, or rather, I see it how it is. It's up to me to adjust my attitude concerning that, rather than making a fool of myself and making a scene.
I can appreciate Gendankens wit. But if she were so intelligent as every one claims, why is it that she cannot learn from her past mistakes and adjust her behavior here? Certainly she must know that a perma ban is in order if she refuses to do so. I would rather see her back off of the insults a bit and remain a member here. She does not have to sacrifice her wit at the cost of her intelligence.
For the record, I thought Loris' butt post was in bad taste... and should have warranted at the very minimum, a stern warning. Especially if this did: http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2587955&postcount=2
I've always known that sci smacks of privilege, but that's the way this place is, or rather, I see it how it is. It's up to me to adjust my attitude concerning that, rather than making a fool of myself and making a scene.
I can appreciate Gendankens wit. But if she were so intelligent as every one claims, why is it that she cannot learn from her past mistakes and adjust her behavior here? Certainly she must know that a perma ban is in order if she refuses to do so. I would rather see her back off of the insults a bit and remain a member here. She does not have to sacrifice her wit at the cost of her intelligence.
For the record, I thought Loris' butt post was in bad taste... and should have warranted at the very minimum, a stern warning. Especially if this did: http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2587955&postcount=2
no, not an insult, a personality disorder marked by anti-social behavior. common symptoms are superficial charm and glibness, grandiose sense of self, lack of remorse, shame, or guilt, shallow emotions, incapacity for love, need for stimulation, lack of empathy...
- Status