Do atheists study any biology other than evolution?

Discussion in 'Religion Archives' started by S.A.M., Aug 21, 2009.

?

Do you read on biology topics other than evolution?`

  1. Yes, and I am an atheist

    17 vote(s)
    77.3%
  2. Yes, and I am not an atheist

    1 vote(s)
    4.5%
  3. No, and I am an athiest

    1 vote(s)
    4.5%
  4. No, and I am not an atheist

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Some other opinion

    3 vote(s)
    13.6%
  1. Crunchy Cat F-in' *meow* baby!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,423
    What ideology is that?

    Yep. Organic chemistry, physiology, gene seq, taxonomy, and the list just goes on.

    It's interesting.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. przyk squishy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,203
    In my random meanderings around Wikipedia, most of the biology or vaguely biology-related articles I've visited were about diseases, senescence, cute animals, powerful animals, poisonous animals, hybrid animals, and parasites.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    SAM:

    What if atheists, in general, are only interested in evolution and not other parts of biology? What would that prove about atheists, exactly?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Anti-Flag Pun intended Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,714
    Of course I only study evolution. I don't care about other biological studies as they have nothing to do with my atheist belief system. End sarcasm.
     
  8. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    That it takes theists to get them interested in science? No idea really, what would it prove to you?
     
  9. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    The majority, by far - don't forget those atheistic regimes that prove the evil inherent in denial of all that allows imagination to flourish, eh? IIRC most books on "gene-centric" or Darwinian evolution were banned from the Soviet Union, and are uncommon in China even now.

    btw:
    Is there something about the standard or conventional theisms (Abrahamic) that interferes with an adherent's questioning the way things "seem to them", in the light of further experience?
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2009
  10. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    SAM, you have a bad habit of answering direct questions put to you with questions rather than with answers.

    I'd like to remind you that you started this thread, not me. You must have had something in mind when you started it. Or were you just trying to yank chains?
     
  11. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    I already stated in the OP why I started this thread. To see if atheists study any biology as ardently as they appear to embrace evolutionary science. I was wondering what you thought it would prove apart from what I already stated, since you seem to think it is not sufficient.

    I didn't know that. What is the reasoning behind the ban?
     
  12. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    I don't understand what you mean by this. Can you please explain/expand?
     
  13. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    It seems to me that most arguments by atheists center around accepting evolution. I sometimes wonder what they think it means in terms of their beliefs. Suppose all people in the world accept the current evolutionary theory without any reservations. Then what?

    It seems odd that so many non-biologists would care about anyone accepting or not accepting a scientific theory. Imagine the same fervency given to the string theory. Or black holes. Or entropy/ Whats the big deal? The pope has accepted evolution. What did that change?

    However, it would seem from the poll that most non-biologists who are atheists appear to be widely read in biology. So at least among atheists here, its moot.
     
  14. Varda The Bug Lady Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,184
    What a silly question.
     
  15. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    SAM:

    That's quite a statement. Do you mean that you think that atheists believe that if they can convince people about the truth of evolution then those people will become atheists? I don't think that's what most atheists think, and I wonder what gives you the strange idea that they do think like that. It seems like common sense to me that evolution is not incompatible with belief in God. Nor do you have to believe in evolution to be an atheist. All you need is to lack a belief in gods.

    Then we'd have no Answers in Genesis fundamentalists, I guess. But we'd still have plenty of religious people. They'd just be religious people who accept the science of evolution.

    Do you think that science and religion are incompatible?

    I would say that a lot of atheists see religious beliefs about the origins of human beings as displaying a lack of critical or "scientific" thinking. To them, religious ideas about origins are irrational superstitions. Therefore, it makes sense for them to make their point in the strongest way they can - by appeal to the science and rationality that they believe underpins their non-religious stance.

    The big deal with evolution is that religious fundamentalists spend a lot of their time trying to attack evolution, whereas they do not seem to be so concerned with the implications of string theory or black holes. So, I'd say you may be looking for fervency in the wrong place. The apparent atheist fervency may in fact be a reaction to the fervour of the religious. What do you think?

    It removed part of the cloak of legitimacy worn by the fundamentalists, perhaps. It also sent a message to Catholics that evolution and the Catholic faith are not considered by Church authorities to be incompatible. That's a positive move, if you ask me.
     
  16. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    Meanwhile, reprise:
    Is there something about the standard or conventional theisms (Abrahamic) that interferes with an adherent's questioning the way things "seem to them", in the light of further experience?

    Was. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trofim_Lysenko
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2009
  17. swarm Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,207
    I've an interest in many ares of biology, but as evolution is a cornerstone of modern biology, you aren't going to go far any where else without touching on it.
     
  18. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Exactly.
     
  19. swarm Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,207
    You are confusing atheists and supporters of science. Sure there is a big overlap, but the two are not synonyms.

    Evolution, despite the way fundies spaz over it, has absolutely nothing to do with god for or against.
     
  20. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    And do what? Let their wild imaginations run amok because so many people refuse to think critically?
     
  21. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    It changed the outlook of religions to that of indoctrinated cults.
     
  22. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,855
    Ah James, sometimes you're so bloody naive. hehe
     
  23. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Where?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     

Share This Page