Scientists hear a mystery roar coming from deep space

O.K. How much 'time' does it take you to go from your house (one event) to the nearest ATM (the next event)? Maybe 10 minutes? Or in 'Galactic' terms, How long did it take the (1st event) fuse (once God lit it) to burn before it (the second event) actually blewup (the Big Bang)? It get's pretty simple after that.

I have no clue what you're getting at and, frankly, you mentioning God pretty much extinguishes my interest.
 
I have no clue what you're getting at and, frankly, you mentioning God pretty much extinguishes my interest.

The term 'God' is used as an example for illustration purposes. Whether you believe in the existance of 'God' or not is really irrelevant in terms of what 'Time' means. However, all you have to do is take a look at your watch and monitor the 'time' in the order of when each 'event' happens. for example; Go to the store.......smoke a cigar.......buy flowers for the neighbor's wife.....and so on and so on. I know this will take a lttle 'Time', but give it a try anyway.
 
The term 'God' is used as an example for illustration purposes. Whether you believe in the existance of 'God' or not is really irrelevant in terms of what 'Time' means. However, all you have to do is take a look at your watch and monitor the 'time' in the order of when each 'event' happens. for example; Go to the store.......smoke a cigar.......buy flowers for the neighbor's wife.....and so on and so on. I know this will take a lttle 'Time', but give it a try anyway.

Fair enough. I thought you were going to come up with some sort of screwed up religious argument.
But, I still don't have a clue of what you're trying to say.
 
It's wrong because some of the WIMP theories of dark matter predict that it can interact with itself and decay.

The term is WEAKLY interacting, not non interacting.

And for the record?

plasma is Baryonic matter - it's baryonic matter missing electrons.


Well, maybe because you are a chemist, you wouldn't fully know the in's and out's, but plasma is considered by physicists as a fourth state of matter, which is very different from normal baryonic matter.

So essentially, i am correct. Technically, you are correct too.
 
Back
Top