Ask a question and I'll answer it. Not at all. In this thread, I equate rational with "hasn't accused me of being a pedophile" because rationally there's no reason in this thread to think I am a pedophile. There you go. That's what I'd call a raving silly false accusation, completely devoid of any rational connection to anything I've said in this thread. I haven't even questioned the illegality of child porn in general, much less attack it. I am entirely in favour of the illegality. What I have asked is whether drawings and/or stories which do not directly involve specific real children should be included in the illegality. Maybe they should. Maybe they should not. That's all.